Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Write for the number of with a divisor in , for those with exactly such divisors, and , for the limits of and . Ford's Corollary 2, at , gives the first answer asked by Problem 446:
the order of magnitude of the density of integers with a divisor in , with matching upper and lower bounds; this sharpens Erdős's 1960 estimate and Tenenbaum's 1984 bounds, which match only up to slowly varying factors. For the second question, Theorem 4 gives in a wide range, and Corollary 7 states the consequence for the densities: for every and ,
With and this is , so is false; Ford states this as the refutation of his Conjecture 1, which he attributes to Erdős. The intervals are half-open, , where the problem writes ; the integers divisible by itself have density , far below , so the orders are the same. The paper is filed as Ford 2008; the method combines sieve-style reductions of and to averages of divisor-distribution functions with new bounds for uniform order statistics.
Both parts of the problem are settled by this one result: the growth rate is determined, and the second question is answered no. Ford proves more than the problem asks, whenever and the order of for in most ranges.
Acceptance. Refereed: Ann. of Math. (2) 168 (2008), no. 2, 367–433. Reviewed: the site's curator, T. F. Bloom, marks Problem 446 solved and credits Ford for both the growth rate and the disproof. The page's date is the arXiv first posting, 2004-01-18. No formalization is recorded, and this repository has not checked the proof independently.