Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. There is such that every -vertex graph with no induced five-vertex path has a clique or a stable set of size at least . This is Theorem 1.2 of T. Nguyen, A. Scott and P. Seymour, Induced subgraph density. VII. The five-vertex path, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 132 (2026), no. 3, e70133, first posted as arXiv:2312.15333 on 2023-12-23 (the claim's date), proved in the stronger form of its Theorem 1.5, that has the polynomial Rödl property; the corpus's card records both statements. It is the question of Problem 61 for and, since a graph is -free exactly when its complement has no induced copy of the complement of (the house), for the house. The paper's introduction (p. 1) draws the consequence that this page records as its second part: by Alon, Pach and Solymosi's substitution theorem the five-vertex case reduces to the prime five-vertex graphs, the bull, and with its complement; Erdős and Hajnal had every graph on at most four vertices, Chudnovsky and Safra the bull and Chudnovsky, Scott, Seymour and Spirkl , so the conjecture holds for every graph on at most five vertices.
Covers. and the house and, with the four pages under Depends on., every on at most five vertices. The problem stays open for larger ; the two six-vertex cases claimed later by Huang, Ju and Zhou have their own claim page, linked from the problem page.
Depends on. For the five-vertex conclusion only: Erdős and Hajnal's cases on at most four vertices, Alon, Pach and Solymosi's substitution closure, Chudnovsky and Safra's bull-free case and Chudnovsky, Scott, Seymour and Spirkl's five-cycle case. The theorem itself rests on no page of this wiki.
Acceptance. The paper is a refereed publication in the Proceedings of
the London Mathematical Society, published online 2026-03-23, which is the
refereed evidence. The site's commentary credits the case to the paper and
draws the same five-vertex conclusion, but the site labels the problem OPEN,
so no reviewed evidence is listed. This corpus has not checked the proof.