Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. There is an absolute constant c>0c>0 such that the number of cycle sets on {1,…,n}\{1,\dots,n\}, the sets C(G)C(G) of cycle lengths of graphs GG on nn vertices, is o(2n−nc)o(2^{n-n^c}); the abstract states c≥0.1c\ge0.1. This is Theorem 1.2 of J. Verstraëte, On the number of sets of cycle lengths, Combinatorica 24 (2004), no. 4, 719--730; the corpus's card records the statement from the author's preprint. A cycle set has no element below 33, so its count is the function f(n)f(n) of Problem 84, and f(n)=o(2n−nc)=o(2n)f(n)=o(2^{n-n^c})=o(2^n): the problem's first assertion, Erdős's conjecture stated as the paper's Conjecture 1.1, holds in a stronger form.

Covers. The first assertion, f(n)=o(2n)f(n)=o(2^n), with the explicit saving 2−nc2^{-n^c} in the exponent. The second assertion, f(n)/2n/2→∞f(n)/2^{n/2}\to\infty, is not addressed: the paper's constructions on p. 2 give f(2n)≥2n−1f(2n)\ge2^{n-1}, a lower bound of the order 2n/22^{n/2} without the divergence asked. Nenadov's sharper upper bound is recorded on its own claim page.

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.

Acceptance. The paper is a refereed publication in Combinatorica, issued in September 2004 (the day of issue is not recorded, and this page's date is the first of that month), which is the refereed evidence. The site's remark credits the first problem to Verstraëte, and the site labels the problem OPEN, the second assertion being unsettled, so no reviewed evidence is listed. The corpus's card records the theorem at statement depth from the author's preprint, whose proof (pp. 3--15) this corpus has not checked; the acceptance recorded here rests on the publication.