Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. Let G(n,k)\mathscr G(n,k) be the set of all graphs with kk edges on nn labeled vertices, each equally likely. Almost every graph in G(n,k)\mathscr G(n,k) contains a Hamiltonian cycle if and only if k=12n(log⁡n+log⁡log⁡n+φ(n))k=\tfrac12n(\log n+\log\log n+\varphi(n)) with φ(n)→∞\varphi(n)\to\infty (and k≤(n2)k\le\binom n2). This is Theorem 1 of A. D. Korshunov, Solution of a problem of P. Erdős and A. Rényi on Hamiltonian cycles in nonoriented graphs, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 228 (1976), no. 3, 529--532 (presented to the Academy on 22 January 1976, the date in this page's name; received 7 January 1976), a note that states the theorem and sketches its path-rotation algorithm for k>3nln⁡nk>3n\ln n, saying that the algorithm for the remaining range is omitted for lack of space. The paper Diskret. Analiz 31 (1977), 17--56, 90 (the site's [Ko77]), not held, proves the case k>6nlog⁡nk>6n\log n by the author's own account; the complete proof, a different one, is Theorem 1 of A new version of the solution of a problem of Erdős and Rényi on Hamiltonian cycles in undirected graphs, Annals of Discrete Mathematics 28 (Random Graphs '83) (1985), 171--180, whose comment (p. 179) says that the theorem was announced in the 1976 note, that the 1977 paper gave "a part of proof (for k>6nlog⁡nk>6n\log n)", and that "The proof presented above is different from the previous ones". The corpus records the announcement on its card and the 1985 paper on its card (no file of either is held), with the theorem paged at Theorem 1; the 1977 Russian paper is not held.

For Problem 746: with φ(n)=2ϵlog⁡n−log⁡log⁡n\varphi(n)=2\epsilon\log n-\log\log n, which tends to infinity for every fixed ϵ>0\epsilon>0, the threshold reads 12n(log⁡n+log⁡log⁡n+φ(n))=(12+ϵ)nlog⁡n\tfrac12n(\log n+\log\log n+\varphi(n))=(\tfrac12+\epsilon)n\log n, so the random graph with (12+ϵ)nlog⁡n(\tfrac12+\epsilon)n\log n edges is almost surely Hamiltonian; Hamiltonicity is preserved by adding edges, so the same holds for every larger edge count, which is the site's "≥\ge". The "only if" half of the theorem, which the problem does not ask, says that 12nlog⁡n+12nlog⁡log⁡n+O(n)\tfrac12n\log n+\tfrac12n\log\log n+O(n) edges do not suffice. Komlós and Szemerédi proved the threshold independently, with a limit law, on their claim page.

Acceptance. Reviewed: Erdős writes in his 1982 Singapore paper that "The full conjecture was proved soon afterwards by Kurshonov [sic] and Komlós-Szemerédi" (p. 69), crediting Korshunov by name, with no Korshunov item in that paper's reference list; the abstract of Komlós and Szemerédi's refereed paper [KoSz83] credits the f(n)→∞f(n)\to\infty case to Korshunov by name, with no Korshunov item among its references; and the site's curator, Thomas Bloom, labels the problem PROVED and credits the theorem to [Ko77] in the problem's commentary, citing the 1977 paper with its venue, as the 1985 paper's own reference list does. Not refereed: by the author's account the 1977 journal paper proves only the case k>6nlog⁡nk>6n\log n, and the complete proof is the 1985 paper in Annals of Discrete Mathematics 28, the proceedings of Random Graphs '83, for which no evidence of refereeing is held, so this page lists no refereed evidence; the 1976 note, a Doklady announcement, states the theorem without the proof for the full range. No file of the 1976 note (the mathnet.ru copy), the 1985 paper or the 1977 paper is held. Theorems 1 and 2 of the 1985 paper are taken as printed and its proof for structure only; this corpus supplies no independent proof review.