Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. For n≥600n\ge600, among the graphs with 2n+12n+1 vertices and at least n2+nn^2+n edges, the complete bipartite graph Kn,n+1K_{n,n+1} is the only one in which no two vertices of equal degree are the ends of a path with three edges. Hence for n≥600n\ge600 every graph with 2n+12n+1 vertices and at least n2+n+1n^2+n+1 edges contains two vertices of the same degree joined by a path of length 33, which is the corrected Statement of Problem 816 for those nn, in the stronger "at least" form: the property is not monotone in the edge set, since adding edges changes degrees, so the statement for at least n2+n+1n^2+n+1 edges is genuinely stronger than the statement for exactly n2+n+1n^2+n+1 edges. The result is Theorem 2 of K. Chen and J. Ma, A problem of Erdős and Hajnal on paths with equal-degree endpoints, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 179 (2026), 1--18, first posted as arXiv:2503.19569 on 2025-03-25; the corpus states it on its result page. In the paper's notation, p3(2n+1)=n2+np_3(2n+1)=n^2+n for n≥600n\ge600, where p3(m)p_3(m) is the largest number of edges of an mm-vertex graph without such a pair. The proof bounds the maximum degree Δ\Delta from above by n+2n+32n+\sqrt{2n}+\frac32 and from below by 1716n\frac{17}{16}n, which is impossible for n≥600n\ge600; the authors say a sharper estimate would lower the constant below 150150. Theorem 3 of the paper gives the even-order analog, Kn−1,n+1K_{n-1,n+1} unique with at least n2−1n^2-1 edges for large nn, which the problem does not ask.

Covers. The corrected Statement for every n≥600n\ge600. For 2≤n≤5992\le n\le599 this theorem says nothing; the case n=2n=2 is checked on the problem page, and the whole range n≥2n\ge2 is the subject of the pending full claim of Liu and Zeng.

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the argument is self-contained.

Acceptance. refereed: the Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B is a refereed journal; the Crossref record of the DOI (2026-09-18) gives volume 179 (July 2026), pages 1--18, and the paper link's date is the issue's nominal first day. reviewed: the site's curator, Thomas Bloom, labels the problem PROVED and credits Chen and Ma with the proof, in the stronger form that for n≥600n\ge600 only Kn,n+1K_{n,n+1}, among the graphs with 2n+12n+1 vertices and at least n2+nn^2+n edges, lacks such a pair (the site's page on 2026-09-18, with an empty thread and an empty proof-claim tab); the curator is independent of the authors, and the site's label is the discussion link. The community database lists the problem as proved, an entry last updated on 31 August 2025, and as formalized, an entry last updated on 20 September 2026. Page numbers are those of the arXiv version, the only one, the edition on its source card; Problem 1, Theorems 2 and 3 and the non-monotonicity remark were checked (pp. 1--2), the proof (pp. 2--11) was read for its structure only, and the journal text was not compared, so the published constant was not compared with the preprint's 600600.

Formalization. Boris Alexeev's repository plby/lean-proofs holds, at its commit of 15 September 2026, the file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos816.lean (Lean 4.33.0, Mathlib 4.33.0), whose header declares it a formalization of a solution to Problem 816 with Kaizhe Chen, Jie Ma, Zhen Liu and Qinghou Zeng as informal authors and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as formal authors, and the repository's notes page for the problem. Its theorem erdos_816 states that for every n≥2n\ge2 a graph with 2n+12n+1 vertices and n2+n+1n^2+n+1 edges has two vertices of equal degree joined by a path with three edges, and its docstring notes that the restriction to n≥2n\ge2 is necessary because K3K_3 is a counterexample at n=1n=1; the range n≥2n\ge2 is that of Liu and Zeng's theorem, and the file names both pairs of authors, so it is linked from both pages. The formal-conjectures statement file for the problem, added on 2026-09-20, points its formal proof at this file. Only the file's header and docstring were read; the corpus has not built, audited or kernel-checked the development, and the formal statement was not compared with the problem's wording, so the page lists no formalized evidence.