Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. J. A. Bondy and M. Simonovits, Cycles of even length in graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 16 (1974), no. 2, 97--105, DOI 10.1016/0095-8956(74)90052-5 (received 21 February 1973; issued April 1974, whose nominal first day is this page's date). Its Theorem 1 (p. 98) reads: "Theorem 1. If e(Gn)>100k n1+1/ke(G^n)>100k\,n^{1+1/k}, then C2l⊂GnC^{2l}\subset G^n for every integer l∈[k,kn1/k]l\in[k,kn^{1/k}]", where GnG^n is a graph on nn vertices, e(Gn)e(G^n) its number of edges and C2lC^{2l} the cycle of length 2l2l. With l=kl=k it gives ex(n,C2k)≤100k n1+1/k\mathrm{ex}(n,C_{2k})\le100k\,n^{1+1/k} for every k≥2k\ge2. For Problem 1021 with k=3k=3, the graph G3G_3 joins each of the three pairs of {y1,y2,y3}\{y_1,y_2,y_3\} to its own vertex, so G3G_3 is the six-cycle C6C_6, and the theorem with k=3k=3 gives ex(n,C6)≤300n4/3=300n3/2−1/6\mathrm{ex}(n,C_6)\le300n^{4/3}=300n^{3/2-1/6}; so c3=1/6c_3=1/6 works. The claim value is proved: the result proves the statement for k=3k=3.

Covers. The case k=3k=3, where G3=C6G_3=C_6, with c3=1/6c_3=1/6.

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the identification G3=C6G_3=C_6 and the substitution k=3k=3 are elementary and written above.

Acceptance. Refereed: published in the Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, cited with its venue above. No reviewed evidence is listed: the site's PROVED label settles the whole problem and credits Conlon and Lee and Janzer, whose claim pages carry it, and the site's remark on k=3k=3, which credits Erdős [Er64c] and Bondy and Simonovits, misprints the bound as ex(n,C6)≪n7/6\mathrm{ex}(n,C_6)\ll n^{7/6}. The site also credits Erdős's 1964 proceedings paper [Er64c] with this case; there Erdős stated the even-cycle bound without proof. Bondy and Simonovits (p. 97) describe Erdős's theorem as published without proof, and Erdős writes in his 1974 survey (equation 5) that he never published a proof and that Bondy and Simonovits have proved it, so that statement has no claim page of its own. Read depth: Theorem 1, the deduction of Theorem 1 from Theorem 1* and the quoted theorem of Erdős (pp. 97--98) are checked clause by clause; the proofs (Sections 2--3, pp. 99--104) are followed for structure only, and nothing is independently reviewed by this project.