Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. The answer to
Problem 379 is yes:
, where is the largest such
that every with is divisible by for some
prime depending on . The result is proved in Lean 4 as the theorem
erdos_379 of the code that Zheng Yuan linked from the problem's discussion
thread on 21 December 2025, presenting it as the proof found by Seed-Prover
1.5, an automated theorem-proving system; the claimant is the submitter,
Yuan. The construction differs from the one of Cambie, Kovač and Tao on
their claim page:
for and it takes a prime dividing
and an exponent with , and
considers the row : an entry with
is divisible by , by the -adic valuation of a binomial
coefficient in a power-of-two row, and an entry with ,
, is divisible by , by Kummer's theorem, since the
congruence forces a carry in each of the lowest
base- digits when is added to . Taking gives
along a sequence of rows. A version of the code is the file
Erdos379.lean in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs collection (the second link,
pinned), whose header declares it a Lean formalization of a solution to the
problem with Cambie, Kovač and Tao as informal authors and Seed-Prover 1.5 and
Zheng Yuan as formal authors and points to the thread post.
Submission note. Posted to the site's forum by Zheng Yuan on 21 December 2025:
Check the proof from Seed-Prover 1.5.
Depends on. No page of this wiki.
Acceptance. Formalized. This corpus's verification built Alexeev's
lean-proofs collection at the pinned commit of 2026-09-15 (Lean v4.33.0,
Mathlib v4.33.0, the toolchain of its src/latest folder, in which the
module builds), compiling the module ErdosProblems.Erdos379 and the
collection's comparator challenge for the problem, and checked the axioms of
Erdos379.erdos_379, which are exactly propext, Classical.choice and
Quot.sound; the module contains no sorry. The challenge
ComparatorChallenges/ErdosProblems/Erdos379.lean pins that theorem together
with the definition Erdos379.S, and the fingerprint of both was found
identical to the challenge. What was built is the collection's file, a version
of the code posted in the thread; the code as posted was not itself built. The
statement was audited clause by clause against the problem's Statement and is
exact: S n is the supremum of the exponents such that every
with is divisible by for some prime ; for
this set contains , is closed downward and is bounded, since
, so S n is the problem's , and the junk values
cannot affect a limsup; the theorem says that the limsup of
S n in the extended natural numbers is , which for a sequence of
finite values holds exactly when is unbounded, the question asked. The
definition and the theorem are verbatim the challenge's, the formal-conjectures
statement file states the same theorem, and the file's lemmas follow the
construction above. Not reviewed: the site's label PROVED (LEAN) and its
remarks credit the proof of Cambie, Kovač and Tao and Tao's formalization and
do not mention this proof, and no outside reviewer has published an
examination of it. Not refereed: there is no journal publication; the result
exists as the thread post and the Lean code.