Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Rafik Zeraoulia, A conditional resolution of an Erdős–Graham–Ruzsa–Straus conjecture on reciprocal sums over primes, Zenodo preprint, version 1.0, issued 11 August 2026 (the library's bibliographic card), submitted the same day (05:16 UTC) to the proof-claim tab of Problem 726 as a full proof claim, with the submitter's own note that the result is conditional; the tab names the AI system used as OpenAI GPT-5.6 Thinking. With over the primes whose residue exceeds , the problem's sum, the preprint claims
a form stronger than the asymptotic the problem asks for. The argument, as the submission summarizes it: the indicator of is written as plus a bounded periodic function of with mean zero; primes below a power of contribute ; on dyadic ranges of larger primes the hypothesis replaces the prime sums by integrals, which are small because the periodic function has a bounded primitive; Mertens' theorem then gives the main term.
Submission note. Posted to erdosproblems.com as a proof claim by Rafik Zeraoulia (account Rafikzeraoulia2025) on 11 August 2026, giving "OpenAI GPT-5.6 Thinking" as the AI used:
The paper proves Problem #726 conditionally on an explicitly stated reciprocal-prime equidistribution hypothesis. This hypothesis extends the known smooth equidistribution of the phases to the range $|N|\leq \exp(P^c)$ for primes . Under this assumption, the paper obtains the stronger estimate . The proof writes the relevant indicator as plus a bounded mean-zero periodic function of . Primes below a polylogarithmic cutoff contribute only . On larger dyadic prime intervals, smooth approximations and the assumed equidistribution replace the prime sums by continuous integrals. After the substitution , these integrals are small because the periodic function has mean zero and hence a bounded primitive. Combining this cancellation with Mertens’ theorem gives the claimed conditional asymptotic. Notes: This is a conditional result, not an unconditional resolution of Problem #726. The reciprocal-prime equidistribution hypothesis used in the proof is presently unproved and is stronger in range than currently available theorems.
The hypothesis. The proof assumes a "Reciprocal-Prime Equidistribution Hypothesis", the submitter's name for an extension of the equidistribution of the phases over primes , known for in a limited range through Proposition 1.12 of Matomäki, Radziwiłł, Shao, Tao and Teräväinen, to the range . The hypothesis is unproved, and the submission's own note says it lies beyond the range of current theorems and that no unconditional resolution is claimed. A proof of the hypothesis would make this an unconditional claim; nothing in hand proves it.
Standing. Claimed, conditional: it settles nothing about the problem on its own. The site labels the problem OPEN; a forum comment of 12 August 2026 under the claim classes it as partial, and a third-party evidence record of 16 August 2026, linked from the thread on 24 August 2026, lists no rerun, assessment or independent review, and this corpus has not checked the preprint's argument.
Depends on. No page of this wiki.