Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. For let be the largest size of a
set in which no member divides a product
of members of , repetitions allowed, and
the same with the distinct; let
. The theorem main of the Lean file states that
for every and , for all large ,
where is a dyadic packing constant defined as a supremum, and the
theorem Lambda_limit states . The case of
is the of
Problem 793, whose condition
allows , so
: the constant exists,
and it is the same for the convention requiring . The file does not
evaluate ; Chojecki's theorem gives the value
(its claim page).
The file also states two self-contained corollaries for large , with
constants .
Submission note. Posted to erdosproblems.com as a proof claim by Wouter van Doorn (account Woett) on 5 August 2026, giving "GPT-5.5 Pro and Aristotle" as the AI used:
Let denote the cardinality of the largest set $A \subseteq {1, 2, \ldots, n}$ such that with $a, b_1, \ldots, b_k \in A$ implies . Then Erdős conjectured the existence of a constant such that
The case is the original problem and was solved (with constant $c_2 = 27/2$) here and formalized here. This proof claim is mainly to record that the generalization is now also formalized with a constant that converges to as goes to infinity. Notes: I feel a bit guilty sharing this, as I have not digested the proof myself and don't expect to in the near future. But I hope it's sufficiently interesting anyway.
Claimant and postings. The site lists the entry of 5 August 2026 as a proof claimed by Wouter van Doorn (the account Woett) using GPT-5.5 Pro and Aristotle, with no kind. The blueprint's byline is ChatGPT, and it calls itself AI-generated and not independently verified; the Lean file's header says that Aristotle, from Harmonic, formalized the result from a ChatGPT write-up. The submitter's note says the submitter has not digested the proof.
Formalization. The file contains no sorry and declares two axioms:
pi_alt, the prime number theorem, and DP_empty, the file's own
specialization of Theorem 1.11 of M. Delcourt and L. Postle,
arXiv:2204.08981, used only in the lower bound. Nothing was built or audited
in this corpus, so the page does not list formalized.
Depends on. No page of this wiki.
Standing. Claimed: no refereed publication, independent review or formalization built in this corpus is on record.