Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. Let A={a1<a2<⋯ }A=\{a_1<a_2<\cdots\} be an infinite set of positive integers with squarefree sums, that is, a+a′a+a' squarefree for all a,a′∈Aa,a'\in A, the case a=a′a=a' included. W. van Doorn and T. Tao, Growth rates of sequences governed by the squarefree properties of its translates, arXiv:2512.01087v1 (30 November 2025, the page name's date), prove two bounds on its growth:

(i) aj≫j4/3a_j\gg j^{4/3} (Theorem 8, by the large sieve applied to the at most p2/2p^2/2 residue classes modulo p2p^2 that AA can meet), with aj>0.24 j4/3a_j>0.24\,j^{4/3} for all j≥1j\ge1 from the remark after its proof;

(ii) there is an absolute constant CC and such a set A={1=a1<a2<⋯ }A=\{1=a_1<a_2<\cdots\}, consisting of squarefree numbers, with aj≤exp⁡(Cj/log⁡j)a_j\le\exp(Cj/\log j) for all j≥2j\ge2 (Theorem 7, proved in Section 4.3); Section 4.4 shows that for large jj the constant CC may be any number above 4, which gives the bound aj<exp⁡(5j/log⁡j)a_j<\exp(5j/\log j) for large jj that the site's commentary records.

Erdős remarked that a greedy construction gives such a sequence of exponential growth and asked whether so fast a growth is necessary; (ii) answers that it is not. The source card is van Doorn and Tao 2025.

Covers. Bounds on the growth asked for in Problem 1103: a necessary growth of order j4/3j^{4/3}, superseded by the bound aj≥j15/11−o(1)a_j\ge j^{15/11-o(1)} that follows from Konyagin's 2004 finite bound, and a construction showing that exponential growth is not needed. The true growth rate is not determined.

Depends on. No page of this wiki.

Standing. Claimed. Van Doorn announced both results for the two authors in the discussion thread on 2 December 2025, and later added that some of them had been made obsolete by Konyagin's results and that the first arXiv version holds the proofs. The second arXiv version (7 December 2025) drops Theorems 7 and 8, keeps the construction as a remark that refers to the first version, and states the lower bound obtained from Konyagin's. The abstract of the published version, Acta Arith. 224 (2026), 173–195, no longer mentions squarefree sums, so no refereed version of these theorems is known. The site labels the problem OPEN.