Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Part (1) of the single Theorem of Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta, The irrationality of a number theoretical series, Ramanujan J. 12 (2006), no. 3, 455--460, states that if Schinzel's Hypothesis H holds then
is irrational for every , which would answer
Problem 252 yes for every .
The claim is conditional: Hypothesis H asserts that finitely many
irreducible integer polynomials with positive leading coefficients, whose
product has no fixed prime divisor, take prime values simultaneously at
infinitely many integers, and it is unproven, so this page derives nothing
for the problem's standing. The argument assumes , so that
forces the tail
to be an integer, and takes among the primes for
which is prime for all , which Hypothesis H supplies;
two incompatible estimates of the distance from the tail to the nearest
integer end in the contradiction
for arbitrarily large with fixed. The source card
schlagepuchta_2006_irrationality_number_theoretical_series
names the arXiv posting of 2011 (the preprint link) as the copy read; no
file is held. The unconditional part (2) of the Theorem, the case , is
the partial claim on
its own page;
Friedlander, Luca and Stoiciu proved a parallel conditional theorem under
Dickson's conjecture
(their conditional page).
formal-conjectures tags its variant erdos_252.variants.schinzel, which
takes Hypothesis H as an explicit hypothesis, research solved, citing this
paper.
Acceptance. Refereed: the Ramanujan Journal, volume 12, issue 3
(December 2006), pp. 455--460; the Crossref record of the DOI gives these
data. The site labels the problem OPEN, so its curator's remark that the sum
is irrational for every under Schinzel's conjecture by this paper is
commentary on an open problem and not acceptance, and no reviewed evidence
is listed. The proof is not checked here.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.