Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Theorem 1 of Kyle Pratt, The irrationality of a divisor function series of Erdős and Kac, Acta Arith. 211 (2023), no. 3, 193--228 (arXiv:2209.11124, posted 2022-09-22), states that
is irrational, with no hypothesis: the case of
Problem 252. The proof is
sieve-theoretic, combined with exponential sum estimates, and the author
writes that it pushes those techniques to their limit, so that new ideas
seem necessary for . The paper also frames through the
entire -functions and remarks that they
do not appear to satisfy any differential equation to which the
Siegel–Shidlovskii technique applies. The source card
pratt_2022_irrationality_divisor_function_series_erdos_kac
names the arXiv posting (the preprint link) as the copy read, whose first
page states the theorem, and holds no file; the journal version is paywalled
and was not compared.
formal-conjectures tags its variant erdos_252.variants.k_eq_four research
solved, citing the arXiv posting.
Covers. The case only: is irrational. Nothing about any , which the paper leaves open.
Acceptance. Refereed: Acta Arithmetica, volume 211, issue 3 (2023),
pp. 193--228; the Crossref record of the DOI gives these data. The site
labels the problem OPEN, so its curator's remark crediting this paper with
the case is commentary on an open problem and not acceptance, and no
reviewed evidence is listed. The proof is not checked here.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.