Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Schinzel [Sc87] proves the conjecture of Rényi, first published by Erdős, that the least number of nonzero coefficients of the square of a polynomial with exactly nonzero complex coefficients tends to infinity with , in the explicit form
The bound is the case of his Theorem 1: for a field , a polynomial with terms whose power has terms, and either or ,
The problem's is the same minimum taken over rational polynomials only, so and , which answers Problem 485 yes. The proof inducts on , using Hajós's lemma on the number of terms forced by a zero of high multiplicity, a reduction of to , and a sequence of differential operators; the source card digests the paper, whose Theorem 2 treats positive characteristic. Schinzel notes that the bound is far from Erdős's upper bound (card). The paper was received by the journal on 1985-11-22, as its last page records, and published in 1987.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the result rests on the refereed paper linked above.
Acceptance. Refereed: the paper appeared in Acta Arithmetica 49 (1987),
no. 1, 55–70. Reviewed: the site's curator, Thomas F. Bloom, records the
problem as solved by Schinzel with this bound in the problem's commentary
(page last edited 2026-04-08, read 2026-10-07), and Schinzel and Zannier's
refereed sharpening of 2009
(Schinzel and Zannier 2009)
builds on the theorem. Formalization: a Lean 4 file in the lean-proofs
repository, linked above at its pinned commit, declares itself a
formalization of Schinzel's solution, names Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as its formal
authors under Lean v4.33.0 and Mathlib v4.33.0, and proves erdos_485, that
the minimum over rational polynomials tends to infinity, from a quantitative
theorem schinzel_support_bound for the square case in an imported
development; the file ends with an axiom print. The site labels the problem
PROVED, with no Lean qualification, and the formal-conjectures statement
file for the problem points to that proof. This corpus has neither built the
development nor audited its statement, so no formalized evidence is
listed.