Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. Some graph with no on fewer than vertices has a monochromatic triangle in every -coloring of its edges, which answers Problem 582 yes with the first concrete bound on the least order . The bound is stated as Lange, Radziszowski and Xu report it in the text of their history of (arXiv:1207.3750v2, Section 2: Frankl and Rödl "showed that "); their Table 1 lists , Lu (SIAM J. Discrete Math. 21 (2008), p. 1053) writes , and the site writes . Radziszowski and Xu (their survey) count the proof among the probabilistic ones: a random graph with one edge removed from each is shown to arrow with positive probability. The paper, whose title concerns large triangle-free subgraphs in graphs without , is not held; the statement is taken from these accounts of it.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.
Acceptance. Refereed: P. Frankl and V. Rödl, Large triangle-free subgraphs in graphs without , Graphs and Combinatorics 2 (1986), no. 1, 135--144 (December 1986 by its Crossref record; the day is a placeholder). The site's label rests on Folkman's existence proof, so the site's commentary crediting Frankl and Rödl is not listed as evidence.