Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. There is an absolute constant c>0c>0 such that

W(3,k)≥kclog⁡k/log⁡log⁡k=exp⁡(c(log⁡k)2log⁡log⁡k),W(3,k)\ge k^{c\log k/\log\log k}=\exp\Bigl(c\frac{(\log k)^2}{\log\log k}\Bigr),

equivalently f(N)≤eC(log⁡N)1/2(log⁡log⁡N)1/2f(N)\le e^{C(\log N)^{1/2}(\log\log N)^{1/2}} for the least kk with W(3,k)>NW(3,k)>N, where W(3,k)W(3,k) is the least nn such that every red/blue coloring of {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} has a red three-term or a blue kk-term arithmetic progression (Hunter states it with the colors exchanged; the colors are names). This improves Green's bound kc(log⁡k/log⁡log⁡k)1/3k^{c(\log k/\log\log k)^{1/3}} in the exponent. Hunter's Remark 1.1 records Green's expectation that W(3,k)≤kO(log⁡k)W(3,k)\le k^{O(\log k)} and infers that the bound is likely to be essentially best possible; no source states a matching lower bound as a conjecture. The theorem is paged at Theorem 1 of the library's source card; the locators are those of the arXiv v3 of 21 August 2022.

Covers. The lower-bound challenge of Problem 721, already met by Green on a separate claim page, with the best lower bound known as of the search. The upper-bound challenge is met by Schoen on Schoen's claim page, and the open-ended request for reasonable bounds is not covered: the order of magnitude is open between this bound and the site's exp⁡(O((log⁡k)9))\exp(O((\log k)^9)).

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the result is the paper's own theorem.

Acceptance. Reviewed: the site's curator, T. F. Bloom, labels the problem SOLVED and credits this improvement of the lower bound to the paper in the problem's commentary (page last edited 4 April 2026, accessed 2026-09-18). Refereed: Combinatorica 42 (2022), suppl. 2, 1231--1252 (the Crossref record, 2026-09-18); the locators are those of the arXiv preprint, whose v1 of 1 November 2021 is the first posting and names this page. Green's published article records the improvement in its June 2022 update note.

Read depth. Claims checked: Theorem 1, Remark 1.1 and footnote 1 (pp. 1--2 of the preprint); the proof was not read, the Combinatorica text was not compared with the preprint, and nothing is independently reviewed in this corpus.