Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. The answer is no. Noga Alon's note Blocking partial designs and block-compatible sequences, published as Section 4 of Alon's chapter Problems and Results in Extremal Combinatorics–V (card), states the question as Problem 1.1 (the chapter's Problem 4.1, which cites problem number 664): whether for every fixed constant there is such that any sets with and for admit a set with for every . Its Theorem 2.1 (the chapter's Theorem 4.3) refutes this: for a large prime power and there are subsets of an -element set, each of size more than , pairwise meeting in at most one point, such that every meeting all of them satisfies for some . The construction takes the lines of a projective plane of order and keeps each point of each line independently with probability ; with high probability the pieces have the stated sizes and intersections, and a counting argument over the sets of size at most shows that none of them meets every piece, so a blocking set has more than points and, by averaging over the roughly pieces through each point, meets some piece in more than of them. Since implies for every , the question of Problem 664, asked for every , has a negative answer. The note's Proposition 3.1 (the chapter's Proposition 4.6) shows the bound is sharp up to constants: when every block has size between and , a random meets every block in points.
What remains open. The negative answer is proved at , hence for every , which settles the question as asked, since it is posed for every fixed ; the note does not treat other values of . Whether the full lines of a projective plane admit a blocking set meeting every line in a bounded number of points is Problem 1159, which is open. The version Erdős posed in [Er81], in which every pair of points lies in exactly one (a pairwise balanced block design), with the size condition kept for every and no restriction , is not settled by the construction, whose pieces cover only some pairs; the note conjectures that the answer there is also no (its Conjecture 3.2, the chapter's Conjecture 4.7, on random subsets of the points of a projective plane) and records that the container-method results of Balogh–Samotij and Balogh–Solymosi have different parameters. Theorem 2.3 of the same note concerns block-compatible sequences and bears on Problem 732, not on this problem.
Acceptance. Reviewed: Thomas Bloom, the site's curator, marks the
problem disproved and credits the construction to Alon, restating its
parameters (, ). The note is
posted on the author's page at Princeton; its statements and proofs were
then published, with the same wording, as Section 4 of Noga Alon, Problems
and Results in Extremal Combinatorics–V, in Sum(m)it280, Bolyai Society
Mathematical Studies 32, Springer (2026), 13–29, online 2026-05-28, a
proceedings volume whose refereeing is not documented, so no refereed
evidence is listed. The note prints no date; the file's own creation date
and the server's date for it are both 3 August 2024, which dates the page.
No independent review of the proof is recorded.
Formalization. Boris Alexeev's repository holds a Lean 4 development, added
on 2026-08-17, whose header calls it a formalization of a solution to the
problem and names Alon as the informal author and "Codex" and "GPT-5.6 Sol" as
the formal authors. Its top-level theorem is the case: there is no
such that every family with and pairwise intersections
of size at most has a set meeting every member with
for all ; it follows from a theorem supplying a counterexample against every
proposed bound . The development takes the affine part of a Desarguesian
projective plane in place of the full plane and credits the random half-line
construction to Alon, Kalai, Matoušek and Meshulam; the file is linked above at
the commit the formal-conjectures statement file pins when it names the
development as the problem's formal proof. This corpus has not built or audited
that development, so the page lists no formalized evidence; the acceptance
rests on the curator's credit.