Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. Theorem 5 of the paper (printed p. 181) states that for an arbitrary ordinal ξ\xi, every k<ωk<\omega and every tt with 1≤t<ω1\le t<\omega,

ωξ+1(t+1)(k+1)→(μ,t+2)2for every μ<ωξ+1k+2.\omega_{\xi+1}^{(t+1)(k+1)}\to(\mu,t+2)^2 \quad\text{for every }\mu<\omega_{\xi+1}^{k+2}.

Unlike Theorems 1 and 4 of the paper, which open with the generalized continuum hypothesis as an assumption, Theorem 5 carries no hypothesis beyond ZFC. With ξ=0\xi=0, k=0k=0, t=1t=1 and μ=ω1ω<ω12\mu=\omega_1\omega<\omega_1^2 it gives

ω12→(ω1ω,3)2,\omega_1^2\to(\omega_1\omega,3)^2 ,

that is, every graph on the ordinal ω12\omega_1^2 has an independent set of order type ω1ω\omega_1\omega or contains a triangle. This is the relation the site's commentary credits to Erdős and Hajnal, and the one Erdős records under Problem 3 of Erdős 1987 (printed p. 223) as proved by Hajnal and himself, adding that they could never show ω12→(ω1ω,4)2\omega_1^2\to(\omega_1\omega,4)^2.

Covers. The second question of Problem 597, the relation for finite GG, for G=K3G=K_3 and hence for every graph on at most three vertices, each being a subgraph of K3K_3. It says nothing about the first question, the infinite targets on at most ℵ1\aleph_1 vertices, and nothing about finite GG on more than three vertices, where the ZFC question is open from K4−eK_4-e and C4C_4 on.

Source. P. Erdős and A. Hajnal, Ordinary partition relations for ordinal numbers, Periodica Mathematica Hungarica 1 (1971), no. 3, 171–185, doi:10.1007/BF02029142; the issue is dated September 1971 and carries no day, so this page is dated the first of that month. The second paper link is the open scan in the Rényi Institute's Erdős archive. The paper proves Theorem 5 by induction on tt; nothing on this page is independently reviewed by this project.

Acceptance. Refereed: a journal paper in Periodica Mathematica Hungarica. The site labels Problem 597 OPEN, so the curator's commentary crediting the relation is not acceptance of a claim and reviewed is not listed. White's report uses the relation as the base case of its block-graph theorem.