Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. Christian Elsholtz and Stefan Planitzer, Sums of four and more unit fractions and approximate parametrizations, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 53 (2021), no. 3, 695--709, arXiv:2012.05984v1 (10 December 2020), which dates this page. Their Corollary 3(2) (arXiv v1, p. 5): let u0=1u_0=1, un+1=un(un+1)u_{n+1}=u_n(u_n+1) and c0=lim⁡n→∞un2−n=1.5979102…c_0=\lim_{n\to\infty}u_n^{2^{-n}}=1.5979102\ldots (their Remark 3); then for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and k≥k(ε)k\ge k(\varepsilon),

fk(1,1) < c0(2/5+ε)2k−1,f_k(1,1)\ <\ c_0^{(2/5+\varepsilon)2^{k-1}},

where fk(1,1)f_k(1,1) counts the nondecreasing kk-tuples of positive integers with reciprocal sum 11. The distinct increasing solutions are among them, so F(k)≤fk(1,1)F(k)\le f_k(1,1), and since c0=E2c_0=E^2 for the Vardi constant E=1.264084…E=1.264084\ldots, the bound reads F(k)<E(2/5+ε)2kF(k)<E^{(2/5+\varepsilon)2^k}. The corollary comes from their Theorem 2, fk(m,n)≪ε(kn)ε(k4/3n2/m)(8/5)2k−5f_k(m,n)\ll_\varepsilon(kn)^\varepsilon(k^{4/3}n^2/m)^{(8/5)2^{k-5}} for k≥5k\ge5, and the paper refers its proof to the authors' earlier paper and to Browning and Elsholtz. The statement and its locators are on the [[../library/unit_fractions/elsholtz_2021_sums_four_more_unit_fractions_approximate/corollary_3|result page]] of the [[../library/unit_fractions/elsholtz_2021_sums_four_more_unit_fractions_approximate/_index|source card]].

Normalization. As printed, the bound is weaker than the earlier Browning--Elsholtz bound E(5/24+ε)2kE^{(5/24+\varepsilon)2^k}, which the authors' 2020 paper (card; arXiv:1805.02945v1, p. 1) states with c0=1.264…c_0=1.264\ldots and u1=1u_1=1. The successive improvements change only the exponent constant of the lifted bound, 5/35/3 (Browning and Elsholtz), 28/1728/17 (2020) and 8/58/5 (this paper), and with c0=Ec_0=E these give 5/245/24, 7/347/34 and 1/51/5 as the coefficient of 2k2^k; the 2020 paper's own Corollary 3(2) also prints u0=1u_0=1, which would likewise make its bound weaker than the one it improves. Read with u1=1u_1=1, as the site's commentary reads it, Corollary 3(2) gives F(k)<E(1/5+ε)2kF(k)<E^{(1/5+\varepsilon)2^k}. That reading is a deduction of this page; no source it cites corrects the printed normalization.

Covers. An upper bound for F(k)F(k) of the form c2kc^{2^k}: F(k)<E(2/5+ε)2kF(k)<E^{(2/5+\varepsilon)2^k} for k≥k(ε)k\ge k(\varepsilon) as printed, and E(1/5+ε)2kE^{(1/5+\varepsilon)2^k} under the reading above. It gives no lower bound, no asymptotic formula and no estimate up to constant factors.

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.

Acceptance. Refereed: the paper is published in the Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society. The site's commentary credits the paper with the upper bound, but the site labels the problem OPEN, so that commentary is not listed as review.