Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

../


Source. S. Korsky, A resolution of the de Bruijn--Erdős consecutive-gap problem, arXiv:2609.07196v2, Section 2 and Lemma 2.1 (pp. 4--5) of the retained PDF, read in the canonical conversion beside the PDF and checked against the text layer at the displayed constants; held by its library card, Korsky 2026, resolution.

Standing. Author-recorded reconstruction; not an independent review; changes no status and assigns no tier. The source is an unrefereed, AI-assisted preprint registered as a proof claim for Problem 1221.

Definitions

Let (xn)n≥1(x_n)_{n\ge1} be distinct points of T=R/Z\mathbb T=\mathbb R/\mathbb Z and fix r∈Nr\in\mathbb N. For real t≥1t\ge1 put

Pt={x1,…,x⌊t⌋},Nt(I)=#(Pt∩I).P_t=\{x_1,\ldots,x_{\lfloor t\rfloor}\},\qquad N_t(I)=\#(P_t\cap I).

The sets are nested: Ps⊆PtP_s\subseteq P_t for s≤ts\le t. The rr-spans of PtP_t are the clockwise distances from each point of PtP_t to the point rr places after it in cyclic order, written Si(t)S_i(t); they are the rr-spans at time ⌊t⌋\lfloor t\rfloor. Intervals are oriented half-open arcs (x,x+ℓ](x,x+\ell] of length ℓ<1\ell<1; lifts to R\mathbb R are used to translate endpoints and to measure displacements. For D>0D>0,

Ut(D)=1Dsup⁡x∈TNt((x,x+D/t]),Vt(D)=1Dinf⁡x∈TNt((x,x+D/t]),U_t(D)=\frac1D\sup_{x\in\mathbb T}N_t\bigl((x,x+D/t]\bigr),\qquad V_t(D)=\frac1D\inf_{x\in\mathbb T}N_t\bigl((x,x+D/t]\bigr),

so that Ut(D)U_t(D) and Vt(D)V_t(D) compare the largest and smallest counts in intervals of length D/tD/t with DD, the count a perfectly spread set would give. Write (z)+=max⁡(z,0)(z)_+=\max(z,0).

Hypothesis (2.1). A number A≥1A\ge1 is fixed, and for every sufficiently large tt there are at,bt≥0a_t,b_t\ge0 with at+bt≤Aa_t+b_t\le A such that every rr-span of PtP_t satisfies

r−att ≤ Si(t) ≤ r+btt.\frac{r-a_t}t\ \le\ S_i(t)\ \le\ \frac{r+b_t}t .

Cyclic moves. For a time ss with kr<∣Ps∣kr<|P_s|, let FsF_s be the map sending each point of PsP_s to the point krkr places after it in the cyclic order of PsP_s, and Bs=Fs−1B_s=F_s^{-1} the move by krkr places backward. Both are bijections of PsP_s. The clockwise displacement of FsF_s at a point is the sum of kk consecutive rr-spans of PsP_s (the krkr gaps after the point, grouped in kk runs of rr), so under (2.1) it lies in

[kr−kass, kr+kbss].\Bigl[\frac{kr-ka_s}s,\ \frac{kr+kb_s}s\Bigr].

The counterclockwise displacement of BsB_s at a point p′p' is the clockwise displacement of FsF_s at Bs(p′)B_s(p'), so it lies in the same range. All times below are large enough that (2.1) holds, that kr<∣Ps∣kr<|P_s|, and that every interval used has length less than 11.

Statement (Lemma 2.1, p. 4)

Fix D,E>0D,E>0 and an integer k≥1k\ge1, and put q=E/(kr)q=E/(kr). If q<1q<1, then for all sufficiently large tt,

Ut(D) ≤ (1+3kAD)(1+q) U(1+q)t(E),(2.2)U_t(D)\ \le\ \Bigl(1+\frac{3kA}D\Bigr)(1+q)\,U_{(1+q)t}(E), \tag{2.2} Vt(D) ≥ (1−q−kAD(3−q))+V(1−q)t(E).(2.3)V_t(D)\ \ge\ \Bigl(1-q-\frac{kA}D(3-q)\Bigr)_+V_{(1-q)t}(E). \tag{2.3}

For fixed EE and kk the time threshold can be chosen uniformly for DD in any bounded range.

Proof of (2.2)

Put t+=(1+q)tt_+=(1+q)t and ℓ=E/t+\ell=E/t_+. For 0≤u≤ℓ0\le u\le\ell let s=s(u)s=s(u) be the solution of

krt−krs=u,that is,s=t1−ut/(kr).\frac{kr}t-\frac{kr}s=u,\qquad\text{that is,}\qquad s=\frac{t}{1-ut/(kr)} .

As uu runs from 00 to ℓ\ell, ut/(kr)ut/(kr) runs from 00 to Et/(t+kr)=q/(1+q)Et/(t_+kr)=q/(1+q), so ss runs from tt to t/(1−q/(1+q))=t+t/(1-q/(1+q))=t_+; thus t≤s≤t+t\le s\le t_+.

The injection. Consider

Tu: Pt→ Ft Pt↪Ps→ Bs Ps↪Pt+.T_u:\ P_t\xrightarrow{\ F_t\ }P_t\hookrightarrow P_s \xrightarrow{\ B_s\ }P_s\hookrightarrow P_{t_+}.

Each arrow is injective, so TuT_u is an injection of PtP_t into Pt+P_{t_+}. Its clockwise displacement at pp is the displacement of FtF_t at pp, in [k(r−at)/t,k(r+bt)/t][k(r-a_t)/t,k(r+b_t)/t], minus the counterclockwise displacement of BsB_s at Ft(p)F_t(p), in [k(r−as)/s,k(r+bs)/s][k(r-a_s)/s,k(r+b_s)/s]. Using kr/t−kr/s=ukr/t-kr/s=u, the displacement minus uu lies in

[−katt−kbss, kbtt+kass] ⊆ kt[−at−A, bt+A],\Bigl[-\frac{ka_t}t-\frac{kb_s}s,\ \frac{kb_t}t+\frac{ka_s}s\Bigr] \ \subseteq\ \frac kt\bigl[-a_t-A,\ b_t+A\bigr],

because s≥ts\ge t and as,bs≤Aa_s,b_s\le A.

Enlarging the interval. Let I=(x,x+D/t]I=(x,x+D/t]. Extend II to the left by k(at+A)/tk(a_t+A)/t and to the right by k(bt+A)/tk(b_t+A)/t, obtaining

J=(x−k(at+A)t, x+Dt+k(bt+A)t],∣J∣=D+k(at+bt+2A)t ≤ D+3kAt.J=\Bigl(x-\frac{k(a_t+A)}t,\ x+\frac Dt+\frac{k(b_t+A)}t\Bigr],\qquad |J|=\frac{D+k(a_t+b_t+2A)}t\ \le\ \frac{D+3kA}t .

If p∈Pt∩Ip\in P_t\cap I, then Tu(p)−uT_u(p)-u lies within k(at+A)/tk(a_t+A)/t to the left and k(bt+A)/tk(b_t+A)/t to the right of pp (the left bound strict in the sense that Tu(p)−u≥p−k(at+A)/t>x−k(at+A)/tT_u(p)-u\ge p-k(a_t+A)/t>x-k(a_t+A)/t), so Tu(p)∈J+uT_u(p)\in J+u. As TuT_u is injective into Pt+P_{t_+},

Nt(I) ≤ Nt+(J+u)(0≤u≤ℓ).N_t(I)\ \le\ N_{t_+}(J+u)\qquad(0\le u\le\ell).

Averaging. Integrate over u∈[0,ℓ]u\in[0,\ell]. For each point pp of Pt+P_{t_+}, the set of u∈[0,ℓ]u\in[0,\ell] with p∈J+up\in J+u has the same measure as the set of v∈Jv\in J with p∈(v,v+ℓ]p\in(v,v+\ell] (both are the set of v=p−uv=p-u in J∩[p−ℓ,p)J\cap[p-\ell,p), up to endpoints), so

Nt(I) ℓ ≤ ∫0ℓNt+(J+u) du=∫JNt+((v,v+ℓ]) dv ≤ ∣J∣ E Ut+(E),N_t(I)\,\ell\ \le\ \int_0^\ell N_{t_+}(J+u)\,du =\int_JN_{t_+}\bigl((v,v+\ell]\bigr)\,dv\ \le\ |J|\,E\,U_{t_+}(E),

the last step because ℓ=E/t+\ell=E/t_+, so each Nt+((v,v+ℓ])≤E Ut+(E)N_{t_+}((v,v+\ell])\le E\,U_{t_+}(E) by the definition of UU. Dividing by Dℓ=DE/t+D\ell=DE/t_+,

Nt(I)D ≤ ∣J∣ t+D Ut+(E) ≤ (1+3kAD)(1+q) Ut+(E),\frac{N_t(I)}D\ \le\ \frac{|J|\,t_+}D\,U_{t_+}(E)\ \le\ \Bigl(1+\frac{3kA}D\Bigr)(1+q)\,U_{t_+}(E),

and the supremum over xx gives (2.2). The half-open endpoint conventions affect none of the integrals.

Proof of (2.3)

Put t−=(1−q)tt_-=(1-q)t and ℓ=E/t−\ell=E/t_-. For 0≤u≤ℓ0\le u\le\ell let s=s(u)s=s(u) solve

krs−krt=u,that is,s=t1+ut/(kr);\frac{kr}s-\frac{kr}t=u,\qquad\text{that is,}\qquad s=\frac t{1+ut/(kr)};

as uu runs from 00 to ℓ\ell, ut/(kr)ut/(kr) runs from 00 to Et/(t−kr)=q/(1−q)Et/(t_-kr)=q/(1-q) and ss from tt down to t(1−q)=t−t(1-q)=t_-, so t−≤s≤tt_-\le s\le t.

The injection. This time use

Tu′: Pt−↪Ps→ Bs Ps↪Pt→ Ft Pt,T'_u:\ P_{t_-}\hookrightarrow P_s\xrightarrow{\ B_s\ }P_s \hookrightarrow P_t\xrightarrow{\ F_t\ }P_t ,

an injection of Pt−P_{t_-} into PtP_t. Its clockwise displacement is the displacement of FtF_t, in [k(r−at)/t,k(r+bt)/t][k(r-a_t)/t,k(r+b_t)/t], minus the counterclockwise displacement of BsB_s, in [k(r−as)/s,k(r+bs)/s][k(r-a_s)/s,k(r+b_s)/s]. Using kr/s−kr/t=ukr/s-kr/t=u, the displacement minus (−u)(-u) lies in

[−katt−kbss, kbtt+kass] ⊆ [−katt−kAt−, kbtt+kAt−],\Bigl[-\frac{ka_t}t-\frac{kb_s}s,\ \frac{kb_t}t+\frac{ka_s}s\Bigr] \ \subseteq\ \Bigl[-\frac{ka_t}t-\frac{kA}{t_-},\ \frac{kb_t}t+\frac{kA}{t_-} \Bigr],

because s≥t−s\ge t_-.

Shrinking the interval. Let I=(x,x+D/t]I=(x,x+D/t]. Move its left endpoint to the right by kat/t+kA/t−ka_t/t+kA/t_- and its right endpoint to the left by kbt/t+kA/t−kb_t/t+kA/t_-; call the result JJ, empty if its length is not positive. Then

∣J∣ ≥ (Dt−k(at+bt)t−2kAt−)+ ≥ (Dt−kAt−2kAt−)+.|J|\ \ge\ \Bigl(\frac Dt-\frac{k(a_t+b_t)}t-\frac{2kA}{t_-}\Bigr)_+ \ \ge\ \Bigl(\frac Dt-\frac{kA}t-\frac{2kA}{t_-}\Bigr)_+ .

If p∈Pt−∩(J+u)p\in P_{t_-}\cap(J+u), then Tu′(p)=p−u+ηT'_u(p)=p-u+\eta with η\eta in the range above, so Tu′(p)>xT'_u(p)>x and Tu′(p)≤x+D/tT'_u(p)\le x+D/t: the point Tu′(p)T'_u(p) lies in II. Injectivity gives

Nt−(J+u) ≤ Nt(I)(0≤u≤ℓ).N_{t_-}(J+u)\ \le\ N_t(I)\qquad(0\le u\le\ell).

Averaging. As before,

Nt(I) ℓ ≥ ∫0ℓNt−(J+u) du=∫JNt−((v,v+ℓ]) dv ≥ ∣J∣ E Vt−(E),N_t(I)\,\ell\ \ge\ \int_0^\ell N_{t_-}(J+u)\,du =\int_JN_{t_-}\bigl((v,v+\ell]\bigr)\,dv\ \ge\ |J|\,E\,V_{t_-}(E),

since ℓ=E/t−\ell=E/t_- makes each Nt−((v,v+ℓ])≥E Vt−(E)N_{t_-}((v,v+\ell])\ge E\,V_{t_-}(E). Dividing by Dℓ=DE/t−D\ell=DE/t_-, the coefficient of Vt−(E)V_{t_-}(E) is ∣J∣t−/D|J|t_-/D, which is at least

(t−t−kAD(t−t+2))+=(1−q−kAD(3−q))+,\Bigl(\frac{t_-}t-\frac{kA}D\Bigl(\frac{t_-}t+2\Bigr)\Bigr)_+ =\Bigl(1-q-\frac{kA}D(3-q)\Bigr)_+ ,

using t−/t=1−qt_-/t=1-q. The infimum over xx gives (2.3).

Uniformity

Both constructions use only inclusions from an earlier point set into a later one and the moves FtF_t, BsB_s, FtF_t; the comparison times s(u)s(u) range over [t,t+][t,t_+] or [t−,t][t_-,t] and depend on EE, kk and tt but not on DD. The threshold on tt must make (2.1) hold at all these times, make kr<∣Pt−∣kr<|P_{t_-}|, and make the intervals JJ, J+uJ+u shorter than 11; for DD in a bounded range one threshold does all of this.

Role in the argument

Iterated along a chain of doubling scales from r±Ar\pm A down to Ar\sqrt{Ar} and then applied once more, the lemma gives the short-interval counting bound of Proposition 3.1. Its averaged form, with pointwise span control replaced by L1L^1 control, is Lemma 6.2.