Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

../


Source. Wouter van Doorn and GPT-6 Astra Pro (the author line as printed), Practical numbers and Egyptian fractions, the definitions of Q(k)Q(k) and t(k)t(k) and Lemma 3.3 with its proof, physical p. 4 of the seven-page PDF held by van Doorn (2026). The displays were read on the page image. Uses the Lemma 3.2 reconstruction; consumed by the Corollary 3.4 reconstruction and the Proposition 4.1 reconstruction.

Standing. Author-recorded reconstruction of a claimed result (see the Lemma 3.1 page for the note's standing); not an independent review; changes no status and assigns no tier. Imported inputs: the prime number theorem in the form π(2Q)−π(Q)∼Q/log⁡Q\pi(2Q)-\pi(Q)\sim Q/\log Q as Q→∞Q\to\infty, of which only the lower bound π(2Q)−π(Q)≫Q/log⁡Q\pi(2Q)-\pi(Q)\gg Q/\log Q is consumed; Hölder's inequality; and the inequality (a+b)α≤aα+bα(a+b)^\alpha\le a^\alpha+b^\alpha for a,b≥0a,b\ge0, 0<α≤10<\alpha\le1.

Definitions

c0=14/log⁡2c_0=14/\log2, all logarithms being natural (the note fixes this at the end of its Section 1, physical p. 2), so that 14/c0=log⁡214/c_0=\log2. For integers k≥3k\ge3,

Q(k)=k6log⁡k,t(k)=⌊14kc0 (7log⁡k+3log⁡log⁡k)⌋=⌊klog⁡27log⁡k+3log⁡log⁡k⌋.Q(k)=k^6\log k,\qquad t(k)=\Bigl\lfloor\frac{14k}{c_0\,(7\log k+3\log\log k)}\Bigr\rfloor =\Bigl\lfloor\frac{k\log2}{7\log k+3\log\log k}\Bigr\rfloor .

ω(n)\omega(n) is the number of distinct prime factors of nn; D(n)D(n), Md(X)M_d(X) and the representation (3.2) are as on the Lemma 3.2 page. For a finite set JJ of primes, aJ=∏p∈Jpa_J=\prod_{p\in J}p. All OO, ≪\ll and oo constants below are absolute.

Statement

For every sufficiently large kk, every odd prime p∗p_*, and every positive odd squarefree integer VV with ω(V)=k\omega(V)=k and all prime factors at most 2Q(k)2Q(k), there is an odd squarefree integer A>1A>1 with

(A,p∗V)=1,ω(A)=t(k),(A,p_*V)=1,\qquad\omega(A)=t(k),

all prime factors of AA in (Q(k),2Q(k)](Q(k),2Q(k)], and every residue modulo AA represented as in (3.2) with z0,…,z3∈D(V)z_0,\dots,z_3\in D(V). The threshold for kk does not depend on p∗p_* or VV.

Proof

Write u=log⁡ku=\log k, Q=Q(k)Q=Q(k) and t=t(k)t=t(k); kk is large, so t≥1t\ge1 and t≤klog⁡2/(7u)t\le k\log2/(7u).

The divisor sets. Split the prime factors of VV into two disjoint sets of sizes ⌊k/2⌋\lfloor k/2\rfloor and ⌈k/2⌉\lceil k/2\rceil, and let V1,V2V_1,V_2 be their products; then V1,V2V_1,V_2 are coprime, odd and squarefree with V=V1V2V=V_1V_2. With Xi=D(Vi)X_i=D(V_i) and X=D(V)X=D(V),

∣X1∣=2⌊k/2⌋,∣X2∣=2⌈k/2⌉,∣X∣=2k,|X_1|=2^{\lfloor k/2\rfloor},\qquad|X_2|=2^{\lceil k/2\rceil},\qquad|X|=2^k ,

so ∣Xi∣−1≤2⋅2−k/2|X_i|^{-1}\le\sqrt2\cdot2^{-k/2}.

The prime pool. Let P\mathcal P be the set of primes in (Q,2Q](Q,2Q] that divide neither VV nor p∗p_*. The prime number theorem gives π(2Q)−π(Q)∼Q/log⁡Q\pi(2Q)-\pi(Q)\sim Q/\log Q, and log⁡Q=6u+log⁡u∼6u\log Q=6u+\log u\sim6u, so, since at most k+1k+1 primes are excluded,

∣P∣∼Qlog⁡Q∼k66,|\mathcal P|\sim\frac Q{\log Q}\sim\frac{k^6}6 ,

uniformly in VV and p∗p_*. Every element of P\mathcal P is an odd prime exceeding QQ.

Few primes of the pool divide a difference. Every element of X1X_1, X2X_2 or XX lies in [1,V][1,V], so a nonzero difference δ\delta of two elements of one of these sets has 0<∣δ∣<V0<|\delta|<V. If rr distinct primes of P\mathcal P divide δ\delta then Qr<∣δ∣<VQ^r<|\delta|<V, so r<log⁡V/log⁡Qr<\log V/\log Q. Hence at most

R=⌊log⁡Vlog⁡Q⌋≤klog⁡(2Q)log⁡Q≤2kR=\Bigl\lfloor\frac{\log V}{\log Q}\Bigr\rfloor\le\frac{k\log(2Q)}{\log Q}\le2k

primes of P\mathcal P divide δ\delta, using log⁡V≤klog⁡(2Q)\log V\le k\log(2Q), as VV has kk prime factors each at most 2Q2Q. Put ρ=R/∣P∣\rho=R/|\mathcal P|; then ρ≪k−5\rho\ll k^{-5}, uniformly.

Random subsets. For 1≤s≤t1\le s\le t let JJ be a uniformly random ss-element subset of P\mathcal P. For a fixed nonzero difference δ\delta, aJ∣δa_J\mid\delta if and only if every prime of JJ divides δ\delta, and at most RR primes of P\mathcal P do, so

Pr⁡(aJ∣δ)≤(Rs)/(∣P∣s)=∏i=0s−1R−i∣P∣−i≤ρs.\Pr\bigl(a_J\mid\delta\bigr)\le\binom Rs\Big/\binom{|\mathcal P|}s =\prod_{i=0}^{s-1}\frac{R-i}{|\mathcal P|-i}\le\rho^s .

For Y∈{X1,X2,X}Y\in\{X_1,X_2,X\}, MaJ(Y)M_{a_J}(Y) is ∣Y∣−2|Y|^{-2} times the number of pairs (x,y)∈Y2(x,y)\in Y^2 with aJ∣x−ya_J\mid x-y; the ∣Y∣|Y| diagonal pairs always count, and each of the other pairs counts with probability at most ρs\rho^s. Taking expectations,

E∣J∣=s MaJ(Y)≤∣Y∣−1+ρs(Y∈{X1,X2,X}).(3.3)\mathbb E_{|J|=s}\,M_{a_J}(Y)\le|Y|^{-1}+\rho^s\qquad(Y\in\{X_1,X_2,X\}). \tag{3.3}

Hölder's inequality with three exponents 33 gives

E∣J∣=s(MaJ(X1)MaJ(X2)MaJ(X))1/3≤∏Y(E∣J∣=sMaJ(Y))1/3≪(2−k/2+ρs)2/3(2−k+ρs)1/3,\mathbb E_{|J|=s}\bigl(M_{a_J}(X_1)M_{a_J}(X_2)M_{a_J}(X)\bigr)^{1/3} \le\prod_{Y}\bigl(\mathbb E_{|J|=s}M_{a_J}(Y)\bigr)^{1/3} \ll\bigl(2^{-k/2}+\rho^s\bigr)^{2/3}\bigl(2^{-k}+\rho^s\bigr)^{1/3},

the last by (3.3) and ∣Xi∣−1≤2⋅2−k/2|X_i|^{-1}\le\sqrt2\cdot2^{-k/2}.

The random modulus. Let II be a uniformly random tt-element subset of P\mathcal P and A=aIA=a_I; then AA is odd, squarefree, coprime to p∗Vp_*V, with ω(A)=t\omega(A)=t and all prime factors in (Q,2Q](Q,2Q]. Its divisors d>1d>1 are the aJa_J with ∅≠J⊆I\varnothing\ne J\subseteq I, and with w=(2Q)2/3w=(2Q)^{2/3} one has aJ2/3≤w∣J∣a_J^{2/3}\le w^{|J|}. Let SS be the sum (3.1) of Lemma 3.2 for this AA and the sets X1,X2,XX_1,X_2,X. A uniformly random ss-subset of a uniformly random tt-subset of P\mathcal P is a uniformly random ss-subset of P\mathcal P, and II has (ts)\binom ts subsets of size ss, so

EI S≤∑s=1t(ts)ws E∣J∣=s(MaJ(X1)MaJ(X2)MaJ(X))1/3≪∑s=1t(ts)ws(2−k/2+ρs)2/3(2−k+ρs)1/3.\mathbb E_I\,S\le\sum_{s=1}^{t}\binom ts w^s\, \mathbb E_{|J|=s}\bigl(M_{a_J}(X_1)M_{a_J}(X_2)M_{a_J}(X)\bigr)^{1/3} \ll\sum_{s=1}^{t}\binom ts w^s \bigl(2^{-k/2}+\rho^s\bigr)^{2/3}\bigl(2^{-k}+\rho^s\bigr)^{1/3}.

By (a+b)α≤aα+bα(a+b)^\alpha\le a^\alpha+b^\alpha,

(2−k/2+ρs)2/3(2−k+ρs)1/3≤(2−k/3+ρ2s/3)(2−k/3+ρs/3),(2^{-k/2}+\rho^s)^{2/3}(2^{-k}+\rho^s)^{1/3} \le(2^{-k/3}+\rho^{2s/3})(2^{-k/3}+\rho^{s/3}),

whose expansion has the four terms 2−2k/32^{-2k/3}, 2−k/3ρs/32^{-k/3}\rho^{s/3}, 2−k/3ρ2s/32^{-k/3}\rho^{2s/3} and ρs\rho^s. Summing each against (ts)ws\binom tsw^s by the binomial theorem (adding the s=0s=0 term where it helps, and subtracting it in the last),

EI S≪2−2k/3(1+w)t+2−k/3(1+wρ1/3)t+2−k/3(1+wρ2/3)t+((1+wρ)t−1).\mathbb E_I\,S\ll2^{-2k/3}(1+w)^t+2^{-k/3}(1+w\rho^{1/3})^t +2^{-k/3}(1+w\rho^{2/3})^t+\bigl((1+w\rho)^t-1\bigr).

All four terms tend to zero. Here w=22/3k4u2/3w=2^{2/3}k^4u^{2/3}, so log⁡(1+w)=4u+23log⁡u+O(1)\log(1+w)=4u+\tfrac23\log u+O(1), and ρ≪k−5\rho\ll k^{-5} gives log⁡(1+wρ1/3)≤73u+23log⁡u+O(1)\log(1+w\rho^{1/3})\le\tfrac73u+\tfrac23\log u+O(1) and log⁡(1+wρ2/3)≤23u+23log⁡u+O(1)\log(1+w\rho^{2/3})\le\tfrac23u+\tfrac23\log u+O(1). Write τ=klog⁡2/(7u+3log⁡u)\tau=k\log2/(7u+3\log u), so t≤τt\le\tau.

The logarithm of the first term is at most

−23klog⁡2+τ (4u+23log⁡u+O(1))=klog⁡2 (−23+47+o(1))=(−43c0+o(1))k,-\tfrac23k\log2+\tau\,\bigl(4u+\tfrac23\log u+O(1)\bigr) =k\log2\,\bigl(-\tfrac23+\tfrac47+o(1)\bigr) =\Bigl(-\frac4{3c_0}+o(1)\Bigr)k ,

because τ(4u+23log⁡u+O(1))=47klog⁡2 (1+O(log⁡u/u))\tau(4u+\tfrac23\log u+O(1))=\tfrac47k\log2\,(1+O(\log u/u)) and 221log⁡2=43c0\tfrac2{21}\log2=\tfrac4{3c_0}.

The logarithm of the third term is at most

−13klog⁡2+τ (23u+23log⁡u+O(1))=klog⁡2 (−13+221+o(1))=(−103c0+o(1))k.-\tfrac13k\log2+\tau\,\bigl(\tfrac23u+\tfrac23\log u+O(1)\bigr) =k\log2\,\bigl(-\tfrac13+\tfrac2{21}+o(1)\bigr) =\Bigl(-\frac{10}{3c_0}+o(1)\Bigr)k .

For the second term, write −13klog⁡2=−τ (73u+log⁡u)-\tfrac13k\log2=-\tau\,(\tfrac73u+\log u); its logarithm is at most

−τ(73u+log⁡u)+τ(73u+23log⁡u+O(1))=τ(−13log⁡u+O(1)),-\tau\Bigl(\tfrac73u+\log u\Bigr)+\tau\Bigl(\tfrac73u+\tfrac23\log u+O(1)\Bigr) =\tau\Bigl(-\tfrac13\log u+O(1)\Bigr),

which tends to −∞-\infty because τ→∞\tau\to\infty and −13log⁡u+O(1)→−∞-\tfrac13\log u+O(1)\to-\infty.

For the fourth term, twρ≤τwρ≪(k/u) k4u2/3 k−5=u−1/3tw\rho\le\tau w\rho\ll(k/u)\,k^4u^{2/3}\,k^{-5}=u^{-1/3}, so (1+wρ)t−1≤etwρ−1=O(u−1/3)=o(1)(1+w\rho)^t-1\le e^{tw\rho}-1=O(u^{-1/3})=o(1).

All estimates depend on kk alone. Hence EI S<1\mathbb E_I\,S<1 once kk exceeds an absolute threshold, so some II has S<1S<1, and Lemma 3.2 applied to A=aIA=a_I with V1,V2V_1,V_2 gives the representation (3.2) of every residue modulo AA.

Qualifications

  • The prime number theorem is used only through the lower bound ∣P∣≫Q/log⁡Q≍k6|\mathcal P|\gg Q/\log Q\asymp k^6, hence ρ≪k−5\rho\ll k^{-5}, which Chebyshev-type estimates also supply; the bound twρ≪u−1/3tw\rho\ll u^{-1/3} on the fourth term uses ρ≪k−5\rho\ll k^{-5} in full, and a prime count weaker by a factor u1/3u^{1/3} or more would not close it. The note cites the theorem itself.
  • The note writes ∣X1∣,∣X2∣≍2k/2|X_1|,|X_2|\asymp2^{k/2}; the exact values are recorded above and give the same bound.