Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

../


Source. Pollack, Pomerance and Treviño, Sets of monotonicity for Euler's totient function, Theorem A (quoted on physical p. 5), Theorem 3.3 (statement and Remark 3.1 on physical p. 6, proof on physical p. 7) of the 17-page author manuscript held by its library card, Pollack, Pomerance and Treviño (2013), whose Theorem 3.3 page records the statement. The counting input from the same source is Lemma 3.2; the theorem feeds the proof of Theorem 1.2.

Standing. Author-recorded reconstruction; not an independent review; changes no status and assigns no tier. Three inputs are imported into the proof and not re-derived: Theorem A (whose short verification is nevertheless written out below), Selberg's upper bound sieve in the form the source states, and Evertse's SS-unit bound inside Lemma 3.2; the corollary's two classical bounds on ω(k)\omega(k) and k/φ(k)k/\varphi(k) are imported as well.

Definitions

For a natural number nn let γ(n)=∏p∣np\gamma(n)=\prod_{p\mid n}p and let ω(n)\omega(n) be the number of distinct prime factors of nn. For a natural number kk let P(x;k)=#{n≤x:φ(n)=φ(n+k)}P(x;k)=\#\{n\le x:\varphi(n)=\varphi(n+k)\}.

Theorem A (source p. 5, quoted from S. W. Graham, J. J. Holt and C. Pomerance, On the solutions to φ(n)=φ(n+k)\varphi(n)=\varphi(n+k), 1999, Theorem 1; card Graham, Holt and Pomerance (1999)). Let jj and j+kj+k have the same prime factors (so kk is even), let g=gcd⁡(j,j+k)g=\gcd(j,j+k), and let rr be a positive integer such that both

jgr+1andj+kgr+1\frac{j}{g}r+1\qquad\text{and}\qquad\frac{j+k}{g}r+1

are primes not dividing jj. Then n=j(j+kgr+1)n=j\bigl(\frac{j+k}{g}r+1\bigr) satisfies φ(n)=φ(n+k)\varphi(n)=\varphi(n+k).

Verification (the corpus's; the source only quotes the theorem). Write a=j/ga=j/g, b=(j+k)/gb=(j+k)/g, so gcd⁡(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b)=1 and b−a=k/gb-a=k/g; let p=ar+1p=ar+1 and q=br+1q=br+1 be the two primes. Then n=jqn=jq and (j+k)p=(j+k)ar+j+k=gabr+j+k=jbr+j+k=jq+k=n+k(j+k)p=(j+k)ar+j+k=gabr+j+k=jbr+j+k=jq+k=n+k. Since q∤jq\nmid j and pp divides neither jj nor (having the same prime factors) j+kj+k, multiplicativity gives φ(n)=φ(j)(q−1)=φ(j)br\varphi(n)=\varphi(j)(q-1)=\varphi(j)br and φ(n+k)=φ(j+k)(p−1)=φ(j+k)ar\varphi(n+k)=\varphi(j+k)(p-1)=\varphi(j+k)ar. As jj and j+kj+k have the same prime factors, φ(j)/j=φ(j+k)/(j+k)=:θ\varphi(j)/j=\varphi(j+k)/(j+k)=:\theta, so φ(n)=θjbr=θgabr=θ(j+k)ar=φ(n+k)\varphi(n)=\theta jbr=\theta gabr=\theta(j+k)ar=\varphi(n+k).

Let P0(x;k)P_0(x;k) be the number of solutions n≤xn\le x of φ(n)=φ(n+k)\varphi(n)=\varphi(n+k) that have the form of Theorem A for some admissible jj and rr, and P1(x;k)=P(x;k)−P0(x;k)P_1(x;k)=P(x;k)-P_0(x;k). For even kk put (source (3.2))

c(k)=∑j: γ(j)=γ(j+k)gcd⁡(j,j+k)j(j+k)∏p∣jk(j+k)/gcd⁡(j,j+k)3p>2p−1p−2,c(k)=\sum_{j:\ \gamma(j)=\gamma(j+k)}\frac{\gcd(j,j+k)}{j(j+k)} \prod_{\substack{p\mid jk(j+k)/\gcd(j,j+k)^3\\p>2}}\frac{p-1}{p-2},

and let C2=2∏p>2(1−(p−1)−2)C_2=2\prod_{p>2}\bigl(1-(p-1)^{-2}\bigr) (the source's normalization of the twin prime constant, p. 5). With g=gcd⁡(j,j+k)g=\gcd(j,j+k), a=j/ga=j/g, b=(j+k)/gb=(j+k)/g one has g∣kg\mid k and jk(j+k)/g3=ab(b−a)jk(j+k)/g^3=ab(b-a), an integer.

Statement

Let ε(x)>0\varepsilon(x)>0 satisfy ε(x)→0\varepsilon(x)\to0 and xε(x)→∞x^{\varepsilon(x)}\to\infty. For even kk with 2≤k≤xε(x)2\le k\le x^{\varepsilon(x)}, as x→∞x\to\infty,

P0(x;k)≤(16C2+o(1)) c(k) x(log⁡x)2,P_0(x;k)\le(16C_2+o(1))\,c(k)\,\frac{x}{(\log x)^2},

uniformly in kk. Moreover

12k≤c(k)≤(3⋅73+2ω(k)∏p∣kp>2p−1p−2)1k.\frac1{2k}\le c(k)\le \Bigl(3\cdot7^{3+2\omega(k)}\prod_{\substack{p\mid k\\p>2}}\frac{p-1}{p-2}\Bigr) \frac1k .

Corollary used in Theorem 1.2 (Remark 3.1): c(k)≤c∗c(k)\le c^* for an absolute constant c∗c^*.

Imported inputs

Lemma 3.2 (reconstructed on its page): for every natural number kk, the number of jj with γ(j)=γ(j+k)\gamma(j)=\gamma(j+k) is at most 3⋅73+2ω(k)3\cdot7^{3+2\omega(k)}; for each ϵ>0\epsilon>0 it is below kϵk^\epsilon once k>k0(ϵ)k>k_0(\epsilon).

Selberg's upper bound sieve, as the source applies it on p. 7 citing Halberstam and Richert, Sieve methods (1974), Theorem 5.7 (not held): for fixed jj with γ(j)=γ(j+k)\gamma(j)=\gamma(j+k), the number of n≤xn\le x of the Theorem A form with this jj is at most

(16C2+o(1)) gj(j+k)∏p∣jk(j+k)/g3p>2p−1p−2⋅x(log⁡x)2(x→∞),(16C_2+o(1))\,\frac{g}{j(j+k)} \prod_{\substack{p\mid jk(j+k)/g^3\\p>2}}\frac{p-1}{p-2} \cdot\frac{x}{(\log x)^2}\qquad(x\to\infty),

with the o(1)o(1) uniform over the k≤xε(x)k\le x^{\varepsilon(x)} and the jj with j(j+k)/g≤xε(x)j(j+k)/g\le x^{\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}} under consideration. The constant 16C216C_2 and this uniformity are taken from the source and were not checked against Halberstam and Richert. If the sieve is stated for the r≤Rj:=gx/(j(j+k))r\le R_j:=gx/(j(j+k)) with ar+1ar+1 and br+1br+1 prime, in terms of Rj/(log⁡Rj)2R_j/(\log R_j)^2, the passage to x/(log⁡x)2x/(\log x)^2 is uniform because Rj≥x1−ε(x)R_j\ge x^{1-\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}} gives log⁡Rj≥(1−ε(x))log⁡x\log R_j\ge(1-\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)})\log x.

Two classical bounds for the corollary: ω(k)≪log⁡k/log⁡log⁡3k\omega(k)\ll\log k/\log\log 3k (the source cites Hardy and Wright, An introduction to the theory of numbers, 6th ed., p. 471; not held) and k/φ(k)≪log⁡log⁡3kk/\varphi(k)\ll\log\log 3k (Hardy and Wright, Theorem 328; not held).

Proof

Throughout, kk is even with 2≤k≤xε(x)2\le k\le x^{\varepsilon(x)}, and xx is large. Note that xε(x)→∞x^{\varepsilon(x)}\to\infty means ε(x)log⁡x→∞\varepsilon(x)\log x\to\infty, so ε(x)>1/log⁡x\varepsilon(x)>1/\log x for large xx.

Step 0: the bounds on c(k)c(k). Every term of c(k)c(k) is nonnegative. For the lower bound take j=kj=k: then j+k=2kj+k=2k and γ(k)=γ(2k)\gamma(k)=\gamma(2k) because kk is even, g=gcd⁡(k,2k)=kg=\gcd(k,2k)=k, and the term is kk⋅2k∏(⋯ )≥12k\frac{k}{k\cdot2k}\prod(\cdots)\ge\frac1{2k}, as each factor p−1p−2\frac{p-1}{p-2} is at least 11. For the upper bound fix an admissible jj. Since g≤jg\le j, gj(j+k)≤1j+k<1k\frac{g}{j(j+k)}\le\frac1{j+k}<\frac1k. If a prime pp divides ab(b−a)ab(b-a), then pp divides jj, or j+kj+k, or k/gk/g; in the first two cases pp divides both jj and j+kj+k (they have the same prime factors) and hence p∣kp\mid k; in the third p∣kp\mid k directly. So the product over p∣ab(b−a)p\mid ab(b-a), p>2p>2, is at most the product over p∣kp\mid k, p>2p>2, and every term is at most 1k∏p∣k,p>2p−1p−2\frac1k\prod_{p\mid k,p>2}\frac{p-1}{p-2}. Lemma 3.2 bounds the number of terms by 3⋅73+2ω(k)3\cdot7^{3+2\omega(k)}, giving the stated upper bound.

Step 0′: c(k)c(k) is absolutely bounded (Remark 3.1). For p=3p=3, p−1p−2=2≤(1−13)−2\frac{p-1}{p-2}=2\le(1-\frac13)^{-2}; for p≥5p\ge5, p−1p−2=1+1p−2≤1+2p≤(1−1p)−2\frac{p-1}{p-2}=1+\frac1{p-2}\le1+\frac2p\le(1-\frac1p)^{-2}. Hence ∏p∣k,p>2p−1p−2≤(k/φ(k))2≪(log⁡log⁡3k)2\prod_{p\mid k,p>2}\frac{p-1}{p-2}\le(k/\varphi(k))^2\ll(\log\log3k)^2. Also 72ω(k)=exp⁡(2ω(k)log⁡7)=exp⁡(O(log⁡k/log⁡log⁡3k))=ko(1)7^{2\omega(k)}=\exp(2\omega(k)\log7)=\exp(O(\log k/\log\log3k))=k^{o(1)}. So c(k)≤3⋅73⋅k−1+o(1)(log⁡log⁡3k)2→0c(k)\le3\cdot7^3\cdot k^{-1+o(1)}(\log\log3k)^2\to0 as k→∞k\to\infty, and since the upper bound in Step 0 is finite for each kk, c(k)≤c∗c(k)\le c^* for all even kk with an absolute constant c∗c^*.

Step 1: the small jj. Put T=xε(x)T=x^{\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}} and call jj small if γ(j)=γ(j+k)\gamma(j)=\gamma(j+k) and j(j+k)/g≤Tj(j+k)/g\le T. For such jj the sieve input bounds the number of n≤xn\le x of the Theorem A form with this jj by (16C2+o(1))gj(j+k)∏p∣ab(b−a),p>2p−1p−2⋅x/(log⁡x)2(16C_2+o(1))\frac{g}{j(j+k)}\prod_{p\mid ab(b-a),p>2}\frac{p-1}{p-2}\cdot x/(\log x)^2, uniformly. Summing over the small jj, whose terms form a sub-sum of the nonnegative series defining c(k)c(k), the small jj contribute at most (16C2+o(1))c(k)x/(log⁡x)2(16C_2+o(1))c(k)x/(\log x)^2.

Step 2: the large jj. Call jj large if γ(j)=γ(j+k)\gamma(j)=\gamma(j+k) and j(j+k)/g>Tj(j+k)/g>T. An n≤xn\le x of the Theorem A form with this jj satisfies n=j(br+1)>jbr=j(j+k)grn=j(br+1)>jbr=\frac{j(j+k)}{g}r (source (3.3)), so r<gx/(j(j+k))<x/Tr<gx/(j(j+k))<x/T, and there are fewer than x/T=x1−ε(x)x/T=x^{1-\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}} choices of rr. The number of admissible jj is at most xε(x)x^{\varepsilon(x)} for large xx: by Lemma 3.2 with ϵ=1\epsilon=1 it is below k≤xε(x)k\le x^{\varepsilon(x)} when k>k0(1)k>k_0(1), and for the finitely many even k≤k0(1)k\le k_0(1) it is at most the constant max⁡k≤k0(1)3⋅73+2ω(k)\max_{k\le k_0(1)}3\cdot7^{3+2\omega(k)}, which is below xε(x)x^{\varepsilon(x)} for large xx because xε(x)→∞x^{\varepsilon(x)}\to\infty. Hence the large jj contribute at most

x1−ε(x)+ε(x)≤x1−12ε(x)x^{1-\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}+\varepsilon(x)}\le x^{1-\frac12\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}}

for large xx, since ε(x)≤12ε(x)\varepsilon(x)\le\frac12\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)} once ε(x)≤14\varepsilon(x)\le\frac14.

Step 3: the large jj are absorbed into the o(1)o(1). Using c(k)≥1/(2k)c(k)\ge1/(2k) and then k≤xε(x)k\le x^{\varepsilon(x)},

x1−12ε(x)c(k) x(log⁡x)−2≤2k(log⁡x)2x−12ε(x)≤(log⁡x)2x−13ε(x)<1log⁡x\frac{x^{1-\frac12\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}}}{c(k)\,x(\log x)^{-2}} \le2k(\log x)^2x^{-\frac12\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}} \le(\log x)^2x^{-\frac13\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}} <\frac1{\log x}

for large xx, uniformly in kk. The middle inequality needs 2k≤x16ε(x)2k\le x^{\frac16\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}}: since ε(x)→0\varepsilon(x)\to0, ε(x)≤112ε(x)\varepsilon(x)\le\frac1{12}\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)} for large xx, so k≤xε(x)≤x112ε(x)k\le x^{\varepsilon(x)}\le x^{\frac1{12}\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}}, and 2≤x112ε(x)2\le x^{\frac1{12}\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}} because ε(x)log⁡x>log⁡x→∞\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}\log x>\sqrt{\log x}\to\infty (from ε(x)>1/log⁡x\varepsilon(x)>1/\log x). The last inequality: the same bound gives x−13ε(x)<exp⁡(−13log⁡x)<(log⁡x)−3x^{-\frac13\sqrt{\varepsilon(x)}}<\exp(-\frac13\sqrt{\log x})<(\log x)^{-3} for large xx. Hence the large jj contribute at most c(k)x/(log⁡x)3=o(1)⋅c(k)x/(log⁡x)2c(k)x/(\log x)^3=o(1)\cdot c(k)x/(\log x)^2 uniformly in kk.

Adding Steps 1 and 3, P0(x;k)≤(16C2+o(1))c(k)x/(log⁡x)2P_0(x;k)\le(16C_2+o(1))c(k)x/(\log x)^2 uniformly for even 2≤k≤xε(x)2\le k\le x^{\varepsilon(x)}. □\square

Gaps. The sieve bound is imported with its constant and uniformity as the source states them; Theorem A is imported from Graham, Holt and Pomerance, though its verification is written out above; Evertse's bound enters through Lemma 3.2. The two classical bounds used in Step 0′ for the corollary are imported from Hardy and Wright, not held. Everything else is written out.