Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

An application of graph theory to additive number theory

Full paper in Markdown.


N. Alon, P. Erdős: An application of graph theory to additive number theory, European J. Combin. 6 (1985) no. 3, 201--203 ( MR 87d:11015; Zentralblatt 581.10029.

Theorem 1 states that every B2(k)B_2^{(k)} sequence of nn terms (one in which each integer has at most kk representations as a sum of two distinct terms) is a union of c2(k)n1/3c_2(k)n^{1/3} Sidon (B2B_2) sequences. This order is sharp up to the kk-dependent constant. Its main ingredient is inequality (4), Hn(k)≥c4(k)n2/3H_n^{(k)}\geq c_4(k)n^{2/3}, for the largest Sidon subset guaranteed inside such a sequence (p. 201, Theorem 1 and (4)). Repeatedly removing a subset of that size gives the asserted partition (p. 202, first paragraph).

The proof of (4) is a useful finite hypergraph template. On the indices {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}, put a 4-edge {i,j,l,m}\{i,j,l,m\} whenever ai+aj=al+ama_i+a_j=a_l+a_m. The B2(k)B_2^{(k)} hypothesis gives fewer than 12(k−1)(n2)≤14(k−1)n2\frac12(k-1)\binom n2\le\frac14(k-1)n^2 edges. An independent vertex set indexes a Sidon subsequence. Selecting vertices independently with probability cn−1/3c n^{-1/3} gives about cn2/3c n^{2/3} selected vertices and only about 14(k−1)c4n2/3\frac14(k-1)c^4n^{2/3} surviving edges; deleting one vertex from each edge leaves the required independent set when c=c(k)c=c(k) is small (p. 202, proof of Theorem 1). Theorem 2 adapts the selection to an infinite sequence, using probability c/i1/3c/i^{1/3} and deletion of the largest member of each bad quadruple, to obtain the prefix-by-prefix bound (5) (p. 202). Theorem 3 uses a different route: its 3-uniform hypergraph of three-term progressions has at most rkrk edges on every rr vertices, hence a vertex of degree at most 3k3k; greedy coloring and compactness then give a partition into at most 3k+13k+1 progression-free subsequences (p. 202).

For problem 772, the paper supplies the n2/3n^{2/3} lower bound (4). For problem 530, it records the Komlós--Sulyok--Szemerédi bound Hn>cn1/2H_n>cn^{1/2} for arbitrary sequences of nn integers, and Hn=(1+o(1))n1/2H_n=(1+o(1))n^{1/2} as a possible strengthening that "does not seem to be easy to prove" (p. 201, (2) and the sentence following it). Theorem 4 gives the analogous B2(k)B_2^{(k)}-to-B2(k−1)B_2^{(k-1)} partition with exponent 1/(2k−1)1/(2k-1) (pp. 202--203). For problem 773, the closing remarks show that {1,22,…,n2}\{1,2^2,\ldots,n^2\} has a Sidon subset of size c(ϵ)n2/3−ϵc(\epsilon)n^{2/3-\epsilon}, while Landau's theorem gives the upper bound c′n/(log⁡n)1/4c'n/(\log n)^{1/4} (p. 203, paragraphs immediately before the final problem).

Problem 774

The final paragraph on p. 203 gives the original formulation. A sequence is called free when two distinct finite sets of indices never have the same sum. For an increasing enumeration of a subset of N\mathbb N, this is exactly the property called dissociated in [[problems/integer_sequences/E0774/_index|Problem 774]]. Pisier's necessary condition (6) says that there is a fixed δ>0\delta>0 such that every finite subsequence BB contains a free subsequence CC with ∣C∣≥δ∣B∣|C|\geq\delta|B|. Thus (6) is exactly proportional dissociation, and the question whether it forces a union of finitely many free subsequences is exactly E0774. The authors' judgment is explicitly negative but unresolved: they say that sufficiency "seems unlikely," while also saying that they could not find a counterexample (p. 203, final paragraph and (6)). The paper proves no implication or counterexample for this question.

There is a precise hypergraph reformulation behind the analogy. For a finite B⊂AB\subset A, make a hyperedge from the union of two distinct finite subsets of BB having the same sum (equivalently, from the support of a nonzero {−1,0,1}\{-1,0,1\} relation). Dissociated subsets are exactly independent sets in this relation hypergraph. Condition (6) gives a linear-size independent set in every finite induced subhypergraph, whereas a partition into finitely many dissociated sets asks for a uniform finite coloring of the whole relation hypergraph.

The paper's successful hypergraph arguments do not themselves bridge that gap. For the B2(k)B_2^{(k)} result, all forbidden relations are 4-uniform and the representation hypothesis gives a quadratic edge bound. For Theorem 3, every finite induced hypergraph has bounded degeneracy. In E0774 the forbidden subset-sum relations have unbounded support, and condition (6) supplies neither an edge-count bound nor bounded local degree or degeneracy. Random selection-and-deletion can recover the independent set already postulated by (6), but the paper gives no mechanism for turning that hereditary linear-independence condition into a bounded coloring. Any transfer of the method therefore needs additional structure specific to subset-sum relation hypergraphs, not merely the abstract independence-ratio hypothesis.

Source: https://users.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/1985-07.pdf. Local reading copy: Markdown.