Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Limits of rainbow representative subgraphs


This page preserves an earlier research route and its local standing. The completed threshold proof is in the solution note.

A rainbow representative subgraph HH retains at most one edge of each color. The proposed spectral lower bound for such a subgraph is false even in super-Turan C7C_7-rainbow colorings:

λ1(H)≥e(G)−o(n).\lambda_1(H)\ge\sqrt{e(G)}-o(n).

Such a bound would imply the half-edge target by λ1(H)2≤2e(H)≤2r\lambda_1(H)^2\le2e(H)\le2r, but the family below rules it out. The same family rules out retaining average degree 2e(G)/n−o(n)2e(G)/n-o(n).

The graph and coloring

For an integer k>50k>50, use five parts

∣C∣=k,∣A1∣=∣A2∣=12k,∣U1∣=∣U2∣=3k.|C|=k,\qquad |A_1|=|A_2|=12k,\qquad |U_1|=|U_2|=3k.

Make C,A1,A2C,A_1,A_2 cliques, and add all CC-AiA_i and AiA_i-UiU_i edges, with no other edges. Color each AiUiA_iU_i block injectively with the same 36k236k^2-color palette. Give all remaining edges distinct fresh colors.

A nonrainbow seven-cycle would have to meet both UiU_i. Such a cycle uses at least two distinct vertices of each AiA_i, because each UiU_i is independent and has neighbors only in AiA_i. It also uses at least two distinct vertices of the separating clique CC. Its length would therefore be at least 2+4+2=82+4+2=8. Thus every C7C_7 is rainbow.

The order and edge count are

n=31k,e(G)=481k2−25k2,e(G)−n2/4=k(k−50)4>0.n=31k,\qquad e(G)=\frac{481k^2-25k}{2},\qquad e(G)-n^2/4=\frac{k(k-50)}4>0.

The number of colors is (409k2−25k)/2(409k^2-25k)/2, well above the conjectured threshold; this is not a color-count counterexample.

Bounding every representative

Let HH be any rainbow representative, and let mik2m_i k^2 be its number of AiUiA_iU_i edges. The shared palette gives

mi≥0,m1+m2≤36.m_i\ge0,\qquad m_1+m_2\le36.

Taking Euclidean norms on the five parts, using the clique-size upper bound for clique adjacency, the complete-join norm 12 k\sqrt{12}\,k, and the Frobenius bound mi k\sqrt{m_i}\,k for each retained port block, gives

λ1(H)≤kλmax⁡(M),\lambda_1(H)\le k\lambda_{\max}(M),

where

M=(112120012120m10120120m20m100000m200).M=\begin{pmatrix} 1&\sqrt{12}&\sqrt{12}&0&0\\ \sqrt{12}&12&0&\sqrt{m_1}&0\\ \sqrt{12}&0&12&0&\sqrt{m_2}\\ 0&\sqrt{m_1}&0&0&0\\ 0&0&\sqrt{m_2}&0&0 \end{pmatrix}.

This bound permits all possible allocations of the port colors, not just a representative taking one whole branch.

Put t=31/2t=31/2. Eliminating the tip coordinates in tI−MtI-M gives arm diagonal entries

di=72−2mi31≥7362>0.d_i=\frac72-\frac{2m_i}{31}\ge\frac{73}{62}>0.

The function x↦(7/2−2x/31)−1x\mapsto(7/2-2x/31)^{-1} is increasing and convex on [0,36][0,36]. Hence

1d1+1d2≤6273+27.\frac1{d_1}+\frac1{d_2}\le\frac{62}{73}+\frac27.

The final core Schur complement is therefore at least

292−12(6273+27)=8991022>0.\frac{29}{2} -12\left(\frac{62}{73}+\frac27\right) =\frac{899}{1022}>0.

Thus tI−MtI-M is positive definite and

λ1(H)<31k/2=n/2.\lambda_1(H)<31k/2=n/2.

But

e(G)/n⟶481/1922>1/2.\sqrt{e(G)}/n\longrightarrow\sqrt{481/1922}>1/2.

The gap from the proposed e−o(n)\sqrt e-o(n) bound is linear in nn. This abandons the unconditional spectral-representative route; it does not bound what other color certificates might achieve.