Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Triangle components and weighted mass
This page preserves an earlier research route and its local standing. The completed threshold proof is in the solution note.
The triangle-vertex mass bound localizes to one connected component of the graph of triangular edges. Connectedness alone does not give the three-walk clique property needed for color localization.
A weighted partition theorem
Let a finite zero-one weighted support, allowing clique loops, have total mass one. Suppose its vertices have a partition into parts of mass at most , and every closed three-walk lies wholly within one part. Then its edge mass satisfies
For loopless graphs the hypothesis simply says that no triangle meets two parts. The stronger wording for looped supports is the corresponding blow-up convention: a looped vertex cannot have a cross-part neighbor.
Symmetrization
Keep the support and partition fixed, and maximize over all nonnegative weight vectors of total mass one satisfying the part caps. This feasible polytope is nonempty by hypothesis and compact. Among maximizers choose one with as many saturated parts (mass exactly ) as possible, and then as few positive vertex weights as possible.
If distinct positive-weight vertices are nonadjacent, transfer weight from one to the other. Along this line the quadratic coefficient of is
Thus is convex along the feasible transfer interval. The present weight vector is an interior point of that interval in the following two cases, so an endpoint is also a global maximizer.
If lie in the same part, the transfer keeps all part masses fixed and an endpoint kills a positive weight, a contradiction. Therefore each occupied part's positive support is a clique.
If they lie in distinct unsaturated parts, an endpoint either kills a positive weight or saturates a previously unsaturated part. No already saturated part is altered. This again contradicts the extremal choice. Therefore all positive vertices in unsaturated parts together induce a clique.
There is at least one saturated part. Otherwise the whole support is a clique. A clique of at least three vertices must lie in a single part, since a triangle crossing parts is forbidden; this contradicts the mass cap. A clique of at most two vertices also cannot have total mass one while every occupied part has mass strictly less than one half. This covers looped supports too; loops only forbid additional cross-part adjacencies.
The resulting two cliques
Choose a saturated part , of mass . If another part is saturated, it exhausts the complement. Otherwise all vertices outside lie in unsaturated parts and form a clique by the preceding argument. In either case the positive support is the union of two cliques , each of mass .
Cross edges between form a matching: two such edges sharing an endpoint, together with the appropriate internal clique edge, would form a triangle crossing the original partition. No endpoint of a cross edge has a loop, since that too would give a crossing closed three-walk.
Let be the set of nonlooped positive vertices, and the cross-edge matching. The total edge mass is therefore
Since symmetrization did not decrease the original density, this proves (1).
A large triangle-edge component
The partition theorem has a sharp quantitative extension. If every part has mass at most , where , and every closed three-walk remains within one part, then
For this is immediate. Otherwise run the same extremal-choice argument with cap . Each occupied part and the union of all unsaturated parts still induce cliques. If no part saturates, the support is a clique that cannot lie in one part of mass one. It therefore has at most two vertices in different parts, both nonlooped, and , which implies (2).
If a part saturates, its mass is . For all other parts are unsaturated, so its complement of mass is a clique. For the same conclusion was proved above. Cross edges form a matching with nonlooped endpoints. The previous sum-of-squares calculation now gives
This proves (2), with equality for two disjoint looped clique types of weights .
Now form the graph of edges belonging to closed three-walks. If necessary, first split each nontriangular type into independent false twins of weight at most . This preserves the density and all triangular components; each new nontriangular vertex is isolated in the triangular-edge graph. Partition into components. Every closed three-walk lies in one part, so (1) implies that a component containing a triangle has mass greater than one half. Let be the largest such component mass. All parts have mass at most , and (2) yields
In an ordinary finite simple graph, thus forces a component of the triangular-edge graph of order at least .
Why this does not supply the color certificate
A triangle-edge component need not be a clique in the three-walk relation, even above the Turan threshold. Take five looped types in a path, with weights
and include exactly the consecutive joins and all five loops. Every edge is triangular, the support is connected, and
The first and last types are at distance four, so they have no three-walk between them. The component of mass one is not admissible for a physical rectangle.
Thus (3) does not justify using all its incident edges as a rainbow set. The two-star rectangle inequality and the general weighted palette inequality remain unresolved.
A stronger localization is proved separately: the sharp three-walk clique theorem finds an admissible -clique of mass at least , not merely a triangular-edge component. It still does not supply simultaneous two-walk connectivity or a large enough physical rectangle. The component need not itself be that clique, as the preceding example shows.