Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

../


Source. Aron Bhalla, A conditional note on an Erdős problem on large prime factors of polynomial products, Lemma 2.1, physical pp. 2--3, in the five-page PDF held by its library source card, Bhalla (2026).

Standing. This is an author-recorded reconstruction of the displayed conditional route. It is not an independent review and does not change Problem 976's status or assign a verification tier. The standard Gauss lemma cited by the source is used as an external algebraic input for the final Z[x]\mathbb Z[x] irreducibility transfer; its cited book was not reread here.

Statement

Let f∈Z[x]f\in\mathbb Z[x] be irreducible of degree d≥2d\ge2. Replace ff by −f-f if necessary so that its leading coefficient is positive. Define

D=gcd⁡{f(m):m∈Z}.D=\gcd\{f(m):m\in\mathbb Z\}.

Then there are integers a,Ma,M and a polynomial h∈Z[x]h\in\mathbb Z[x] such that

M≥1,0≤a<M,h(x)=f(a+Mx)D,M\ge1,\qquad 0\le a<M,\qquad h(x)=\frac{f(a+Mx)}{D},

and hh is irreducible in Z[x]\mathbb Z[x], has degree dd, has positive leading coefficient, and has no prime divisor common to all of its values.

Reconstruction

Since ff is irreducible and has degree at least two, it has no integer root. Thus every f(m)f(m) is nonzero and DD is a positive integer. If D=1D=1, take a=0a=0, M=1M=1, and h=fh=f; all assertions are immediate. Assume from now on that D>1D>1 and write

D=∏p∣Dpep.D=\prod_{p\mid D}p^{e_p}.

For each p∣Dp\mid D, the integer ep=vp(D)e_p=v_p(D) is the minimum of the nonnegative integers vp(f(m))v_p(f(m)). Choose an integer bpb_p with

vp(f(bp))=ep.v_p(f(b_p))=e_p.

The moduli pep+1p^{e_p+1} are pairwise coprime. The Chinese remainder theorem therefore gives an integer a0a_0 satisfying

a0≡bp(modpep+1)(p∣D).a_0\equiv b_p\pmod {p^{e_p+1}}\qquad(p\mid D).

Set

M=∏p∣Dpep+1M=\prod_{p\mid D}p^{e_p+1}

and replace a0a_0 by its representative aa with 0≤a<M0\le a<M. Then D∣MD\mid M and D∣f(a)D\mid f(a), the latter because DD divides every value of ff.

Define the polynomial identity

h(x)=f(a+Mx)D.h(x)=\frac{f(a+Mx)}{D}.

It remains to establish that this quotient has the claimed integral and irreducible structure.

Integrality, degree, and sign

For an integer polynomial ff, every nonconstant coefficient of f(a+Mx)−f(a)f(a+Mx)-f(a) is divisible by MM. Hence

f(a+Mx)−f(a)∈MZ[x].f(a+Mx)-f(a)\in M\mathbb Z[x].

Because D∣MD\mid M and D∣f(a)D\mid f(a), every coefficient of f(a+Mx)f(a+Mx) is divisible by DD. Thus h∈Z[x]h\in\mathbb Z[x]. If Lf>0L_f>0 is the leading coefficient of ff, then hh has degree dd and leading coefficient

Lh=LfMdD>0.L_h=\frac{L_fM^d}{D}>0.

No fixed prime divisor

First let p∣Dp\mid D. Polynomial evaluation preserves congruences modulo pep+1p^{e_p+1}, so

f(a)≡f(bp)(modpep+1).f(a)\equiv f(b_p)\pmod {p^{e_p+1}}.

The right side has pp-adic valuation exactly epe_p. The congruence therefore gives vp(f(a))=epv_p(f(a))=e_p, and hence

vp(h(0))=vp(f(a)D)=0.v_p(h(0))=v_p\left(\frac{f(a)}D\right)=0.

So no prime dividing DD divides every value of hh.

Now let qq be a prime with q∤Dq\nmid D. If qq divided h(t)h(t) for every t∈Zt\in\mathbb Z, then the identity f(a+Mt)=Dh(t)f(a+Mt)=Dh(t) would imply

q∣f(a+Mt)(t∈Z).q\mid f(a+Mt)\qquad(t\in\mathbb Z).

Every prime divisor of MM divides DD, so q∤Mq\nmid M. The progression a+Mta+Mt therefore runs through every residue class modulo qq. It follows that q∣f(u)q\mid f(u) for every integer uu, which would imply q∣Dq\mid D, a contradiction. Thus no prime divides all values of hh.

Irreducibility

The substitution x↦a+Mxx\mapsto a+Mx is an automorphism of Q[x]\mathbb Q[x], with inverse x↦(x−a)/Mx\mapsto(x-a)/M. It preserves irreducibility, so f(a+Mx)f(a+Mx) is irreducible over Q\mathbb Q. Dividing by the nonzero constant DD does not change irreducibility over Q\mathbb Q, and therefore hh is irreducible over Q\mathbb Q.

If a prime divided every coefficient of hh, it would divide every value h(t)h(t), contrary to the preceding paragraph. Thus hh is primitive. Gauss's lemma, the standard result cited in the source, transfers its Q[x]\mathbb Q[x] irreducibility to irreducibility in Z[x]\mathbb Z[x].

This proves all six parts of Lemma 2.1. The construction depends only on the fixed polynomial ff and is independent of the later endpoint nn.

Boundary. No prime-value assertion is used in this lemma. The retained source's citation to S. Lang, Algebra, revised third edition, Chapter IV, is the external source boundary for Gauss's lemma. The next page supplies the separate prime-values hypothesis and its conditional application.