Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let denote the size of the largest set such that the sets
are disjoint for distinct . Estimate - in particular, is it true that ?
Source: erdosproblems.com/874
An accepted solution exists. The statement is true.
Proved. The asymptotic was first proved in 1995: Theorem 1 of Deshouillers and Freiman (Israel J. Math. 92 (1995), 33--43) gives , which with Straus's block is , the affirmative answer to the displayed question. The exact value for large followed in 1999: for all ( effectively computable, not made explicit), Theorem 1 of Deshouillers and Freiman (Astérisque 258 (1999), 141--148, published by the Société mathématique de France, whose Crossref record types the article as a journal article in Astérisque) gives , and Straus's block , admissible exactly when (as the same paper reports and as Erdős, Nicolas and Sárközy state in the form for , for ), attains it; so for , hence and , the affirmative answer. The combination of the theorem with the block is a one-line deduction made here. The earlier bounds (Straus, reproved in 1991) and (Erdős, Nicolas and Sárközy, Théorème 1) and Erdős's (1962) are superseded and answer neither part of the question. Straus's paper and Erdős's 1998 paper, both site keys or sources, are not held; for small the equality block size is the numerical conjecture of Erdős, Nicolas and Sárközy, not a theorem. The two accepted claims are recorded on the claim pages of the 1995 paper (refereed; the site credits the 1999 paper, not this one) and the 1999 paper (refereed, with the curator's credit).