Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 874

../

claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 874, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let k(N)k(N) denote the size of the largest set $A\subseteq {1,\ldots,N}$ such that the sets

Sr={a1+⋯+ar:a1<⋯<ar∈A}S_r = \{ a_1+\cdots +a_r : a_1<\cdots<a_r\in A\}

are disjoint for distinct r≥1r\geq 1. Estimate k(N)k(N) - in particular, is it true that k(N)∼2N1/2k(N)\sim 2N^{1/2}?

Formulation. The site's wording (the page shows no last-edited date). SrS_r is the set of sums of rr distinct elements of AA, so the condition says that the sum of a subset of AA determines its size; such sets are Straus's admissible sets, and k(N)k(N) is the F(N)F(N) of Erdős, Nicolas and Sárközy and the maximal cardinality of Deshouillers and Freiman. The notion goes back to Erdős's 1962 condition (1') (Deshouillers and Freiman, p. 141: "introduced by P. Erdős in 1962 ... and called admissibility by E.G. Straus in 1966"). The question has two parts, an estimate of k(N)k(N) and the asymptotic k(N)∼2N1/2k(N)\sim2N^{1/2}; both are answered below.

Status. Proved. The asymptotic k(N)∼2N1/2k(N)\sim2N^{1/2} was first proved in 1995: Theorem 1 of Deshouillers and Freiman (Israel J. Math. 92 (1995), 33--43) gives k(N)≤2N1/2+CN5/12k(N)\le2N^{1/2}+CN^{5/12}, which with Straus's block is k(N)=2N1/2+O(N5/12)k(N)=2N^{1/2}+O(N^{5/12}), the affirmative answer to the displayed question. The exact value for large NN followed in 1999: for all N≥N0N\ge N_0 (N0N_0 effectively computable, not made explicit), Theorem 1 of Deshouillers and Freiman (Astérisque 258 (1999), 141--148, published by the Société mathématique de France, whose Crossref record types the article as a journal article in Astérisque) gives k(N)≤2N+1/4−1k(N)\le2\sqrt{N+1/4}-1, and Straus's block {N−k+1,…,N}\{N-k+1,\ldots,N\}, admissible exactly when k≤2N+1/4−1k\le2\sqrt{N+1/4}-1 (as the same paper reports and as Erdős, Nicolas and Sárközy state in the form k=2m−1k=2m-1 for m2≤N<m2+mm^2\le N<m^2+m, k=2mk=2m for m2+m≤N<(m+1)2m^2+m\le N<(m+1)^2), attains it; so k(N)=⌊2N+1/4−1⌋k(N)=\lfloor2\sqrt{N+1/4}-1\rfloor for N≥N0N\ge N_0, hence k(N)=2N1/2+O(1)k(N)=2N^{1/2}+O(1) and k(N)∼2N1/2k(N)\sim2N^{1/2}, the affirmative answer. The combination of the theorem with the block is a one-line deduction made here. The earlier bounds lim sup⁡k(N)N−1/2≤4/3\limsup k(N)N^{-1/2}\le4/\sqrt3 (Straus, reproved in 1991) and ≤(143/27)1/2\le(143/27)^{1/2} (Erdős, Nicolas and Sárközy, Théorème 1) and Erdős's CN5/6CN^{5/6} (1962) are superseded and answer neither part of the question. Straus's paper and Erdős's 1998 paper, both site keys or sources, are not held; for small NN the equality k(N)=k(N)= block size is the numerical conjecture of Erdős, Nicolas and Sárközy, not a theorem. The two accepted claims are recorded on the claim pages of the 1995 paper (refereed; the site credits the 1999 paper, not this one) and the 1999 paper (refereed, with the curator's credit).

Source. erdosproblems.com/874, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (PROVED, with the site recording the answer as yes; no last-edited date; source keys [Er62c], [Er98]; commentary citing [St66], [ENS91] and [DeFr99] and pointing to Problems 186 and 789 and to the infinite version, Problem 875; indicators "Formalised statement? No" and "OEIS: Possible"), its empty discussion thread and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #874, https://www.erdosproblems.com/874, accessed 2026-09-18.

References.

  • [DeFr99] Deshouillers, J.-M. and Freiman, G. A., On an additive problem of Erdős and Straus, 2. In: Structure theory of set addition, Astérisque 258, Soc. Math. France (1999), 141--148 (Numdam record read: MR 1701192, Zbl 0979.11005; Crossref DOI 10.24033/ast.442). Theorem 1 and the remark, p. 142. Library home: deshouillers_1999_additive_problem_erdos_straus; result page Theorem 1.
  • [DeFr95] Deshouillers, J.-M. and Freiman, G. A., On an additive problem of Erdős and Straus, 1. Israel J. Math. 92 (1995), no. 1--3, 33--43, doi:10.1007/BF02762069 (Crossref record read, issue dated February 1995; received March 11, 1993, revised March 22, 1994, per p. 33); not a site key. Theorem 1, the (2+o(1))N(2+o(1))\sqrt N bound that first answered the asymptotic question, and Theorem 2, the structure theorem quoted as Theorem 2 in [DeFr99], both p. 34. Library home: deshouillers_1995_additive_problem_erdos_straus; result pages Theorem 1 and Theorem 2.
  • [ENS91] Erdős, P., Nicolas, J.-L. and Sárközy, A., Sommes de sous-ensembles. Sém. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux (2) 3 (1991), no. 1, 55--72, doi:10.5802/jtnb.42 (Numdam and Crossref records read). Théorème 1, Lemme 1 and Lemme 2, pp. 56--57; Section 5, p. 65. Library home: erdos_1991_sommes_de_sous_ensembles; result pages Théorème 1, Lemme 2 and Théorème 2.
  • [St66] Straus, E. G., On a problem in combinatorial number theory. J. Math. Sci. 1 (1966), 77--80 (zbMATH record read; no DOI; no Crossref record). Not held. Its results are quoted from [ENS91], p. 56, and [DeFr99], p. 141.
  • [Er62c] Erdős, P., Számelméleti megjegyzések, III. Mat. Lapok 13 (1962), 28--38 (Hungarian); condition (1') and Theorem IV, printed p. 34. Library home: erdos_1962_szamelmeleti_megjegyzesek; result page Theorem IV.
  • [Er98] Erdős, P., Some of my new and almost new problems and results in combinatorial number theory. Number theory (Eger, 1996), de Gruyter (1998), 169--180. Not held; the site's second key.

Formalization. None. No file ErdosProblems/874.lean existed in google-deepmind/formal-conjectures and the site's indicator reads "Formalised statement? No". The community database records the problem proved (31 August 2025), not formalized, no formal proof, OEIS possible.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation). The statement above; PROVED, with the site recording the answer as yes; no last-edited date. The site's commentary, in summary: it names the sets admissible after Straus [St66], attributes to him the upper bound lim sup⁡k(N)/N1/2≤4/3=2.309⋯\limsup k(N)/N^{1/2}\le4/\sqrt3=2.309\cdots and the admissibility of the top block (N−k,N]∩N(N-k,N]\cap\mathbb N for k=2m−1k=2m-1 when m2≤N<m2+mm^2\le N<m^2+m and k=2mk=2m when m2+m≤N<(m+1)2m^2+m\le N<(m+1)^2, whence lim inf⁡k(N)/N1/2≥2\liminf k(N)/N^{1/2}\ge2; records the improved upper bound (143/27)1/2=2.301⋯(143/27)^{1/2}=2.301\cdots of Erdős, Nicolas and Sárközy [ENS91]; credits Deshouillers and Freiman [DeFr99] with proving the conjecture for every large NN and with showing that the top block is sometimes the largest admissible set; and points to Problems 186 and 789 and to the infinite version, Problem 875. The thread and the tab are empty; the community database says proved.

The origin. [Er62c], p. 34, states condition (1') (two sums of distinct terms with different numbers of summands never coincide) and proves Theorem IV, A(x)<Cx5/6A(x)<Cx^{5/6} for every xx for a sequence satisfying it, the first upper bound for k(N)k(N), with the remark that 5/65/6 can probably be improved. The account of Straus's paper is second-hand from two refereed papers: [ENS91], p. 56, records (i) lim sup⁡F(N)N−1/2≤4/3\limsup F(N)N^{-1/2}\le4/\sqrt3 (=2.309401…)(=2.309401\ldots), Erdős's conjecture that F(N)F(N) is attained by consecutive integers ending at NN, and (ii) the admissibility of {N−k+1,…,N}\{N-k+1,\ldots,N\} for k=2m−1k=2m-1 when m2≤N<m2+mm^2\le N<m^2+m and k=2mk=2m when m2+m≤N<(m+1)2m^2+m\le N<(m+1)^2, whence (2) lim inf⁡F(N)N−1/2≥2\liminf F(N)N^{-1/2}\ge2; [DeFr99], p. 141, records the block computation as "admissible if and only if k≤2N+1/4−1k\le2\sqrt{N+1/4}-1" and the bound ∣A∣≤(4/3+o(1))N|\mathcal A|\le(4/\sqrt3+o(1))\sqrt N. The two decimals the site prints are the ones printed in [ENS91].

The intermediate bounds. Lemme 2 of [ENS91] (p. 57) proves F(N)<43N1/2+1F(N)<\frac4{\sqrt3}N^{1/2}+1 from Straus's counting lemma P(A,k)≥k(∣A∣−k)+1P(\mathcal A,k)\ge k(|\mathcal A|-k)+1 (Lemme 1), following Straus's proof, and Théorème 1 (p. 56) gives lim sup⁡F(N)N−1/2≤(143/27)1/2=2.301368…\limsup F(N)N^{-1/2}\le(143/27)^{1/2}=2.301368\ldots by a three-case count of the sums of kk distinct elements (Section 3, read for structure); the authors add that reaching the conjectured limit 22 by their method seems impossible and that a new idea seems necessary for any upper bound below 2.22.2. Read depth: both statements are checked clause by clause; the proof of Lemme 2 is read in full, that of Théorème 1 for structure only.

Status-defining source. Theorem 1 of [DeFr99] (p. 142): "There exists an integer N0N_0, effectively computable, such that for any integer N≥N0N\ge N_0 and any admissible subset A⊂[1,N]\mathcal A\subset[1,N] we have Card⁡A≤2N+1/4−1\operatorname{Card}\mathcal A\le2\sqrt{N+1/4}-1." With Straus's block this gives, for N≥N0N\ge N_0, k(N)=⌊2N+1/4−1⌋k(N)=\lfloor2\sqrt{N+1/4}-1\rfloor: the block supplies the lower bound and the theorem the matching upper bound. In the two ranges of Straus's computation the floor is 2m−12m-1 and 2m2m respectively (for m2≤N<m2+mm^2\le N<m^2+m one has 2m−1<2N+1/4−1<2m2m-1<2\sqrt{N+1/4}-1<2m, and for m2+m≤N<(m+1)2m^2+m\le N<(m+1)^2, 2m≤2N+1/4−1<2m+12m\le2\sqrt{N+1/4}-1<2m+1), so the formula reproduces the site's two cases; these inequalities were checked here. Hence k(N)=2N1/2+O(1)k(N)=2N^{1/2}+O(1), in particular k(N)∼2N1/2k(N)\sim2N^{1/2}, which answers the displayed question. The proof rests on the structure theorem for admissible sets with more than 1.96N1.96\sqrt N elements from the authors' first paper (Theorem 2 of [DeFr99], quoted from Theorem 2 of [DeFr95], p. 34; the same paper's Theorem 1 is the earlier bound k(N)≤2N1/2+CN5/12k(N)\le2N^{1/2}+CN^{5/12}, whose proof from the structure theorem was read in full; it already gives k(N)∼2N1/2k(N)\sim2N^{1/2} and has its own claim page), a local lemma on sums of ss distinct elements of a set that nearly fills an arithmetic progression (Proposition 1), and a refined structure theorem for admissible sets of size 2N1/2+O(N5/12)2N^{1/2}+O(N^{5/12}) (Theorem 3); it was read for structure only. The paper remarks (p. 142) that its arguments also show that for NN of the shape n2n^2 or n2+nn^2+n, nn large, the Erdős--Straus block is the only maximal admissible subset of [1,N][1,N], the uniqueness the site's commentary alludes to. Read depth: claims checked for Theorem 1, Theorem 2 and the remark. Acceptance evidence: publication in Astérisque, vol. 258 (1999), pp. 141--148, which the Crossref record of DOI 10.24033/ast.442 types as a journal article in the Société mathématique de France's Astérisque, and the site's label and credit. N0N_0 is not specified, so the exact formula is proved for large NN only; for all N>1N>1 it is Conjecture 1 of [ENS91] (Section 4, based on tables to N≤50N\le50), which Theorem 1 does not settle.

Neighbors. Problem 875 is the infinite version (open); [[problems/additive_combinatorics/E0789/_index|Problem 789]] asks for the largest admissible subset guaranteed inside every nn-set of integers, for which the present k(n)k(n) is an upper bound; Problem 186 is the site's other cross-reference.

Search scope. None of the routes below found a dispute of Theorem 1, a determination of N0N_0, or a copy of Straus's paper.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the community database record; the formal-conjectures listing (no file on 2026-09-18).
  • The primary sources as stated: [DeFr99] pp. 141--142, [ENS91] pp. 55--57 and 65, [Er62c] pp. 34 and 38.
  • Crossref: bibliographic queries for [DeFr99] (the 2018 Astérisque record and the 1995 part 1) and [ENS91] (DOI 10.5802/jtnb.42), and for Straus's title (no record). Numdam: the item records of [DeFr99] and [ENS91]. OpenAlex: no work citing the [DeFr99] record; three works citing [ENS91]. zbMATH Open: the record of Straus 1966.
  • arXiv API: the search abs:admissible AND abs:"subset sums" sorted by date (one record, unrelated).

Not searched: MathSciNet, Google Scholar, X. Not held: [St66], [Er98].

Remaining gaps. (1) [St66] is not held: the block computation and the 4/34/\sqrt3 bound are read in the 1991, 1995 and 1999 papers, not in Straus's text. (2) [DeFr95] is read at statement depth for the structure theorem the proof rests on: its Theorem 2 is checked clause by clause and its proof (Sections 1--5) read for structure only; only the deduction of its Theorem 1 from it (Section 6) is read in full. (3) N0N_0 is unspecified; the equality k(N)=k(N)= block size for every N>1N>1 is conjectural. (4) The proofs were read for structure only; no independent review exists. (5) [Er98], a site key, is not held.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.