Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Context (p. 343). The paper recalls Erdős's theorem, from Stöhr's survey (its reference [6]) and Halberstam and Roth (reference [5], p. 89), that every infinite Sidon set A\mathcal A satisfies

lim inf⁡n→+∞A(n)n−1/2(log⁡n)1/2<+∞,(11.1)\liminf_{n\to+\infty}A(n)n^{-1/2}(\log n)^{1/2}<+\infty, \qquad(11.1)

and notes that this implies lim sup⁡i→+∞(si+1−si)(log⁡si)−1>0\limsup_{i\to+\infty}(s_{i+1}-s_i)(\log s_i)^{-1}>0 (11.2) for the sumset SA={s1,s2,…}\mathcal S_{\mathcal A}=\{s_1,s_2,\ldots\}. The authors conjecture that this limsup is +∞+\infty, and say this seems very difficult.

Theorem 5 (p. 343, quoted). "There is a positive absolute constant c4c_4 such that if A\mathcal A is a finite Sidon set with ∣A∣≥2|\mathcal A|\ge2 and we write SA={s1,s2,…,su}\mathcal S_{\mathcal A}=\{s_1,s_2,\ldots,s_u\}, then we have"

max⁡1≤i≤u−1(si+1−si)>c4log⁡∣A∣.\max_{1\le i\le u-1}(s_{i+1}-s_i)>c_4\log|\mathcal A|.

Source. P. Erdős, A. Sárközy, V. T. Sós, On Sum Sets of Sidon Sets, I, J. Number Theory 47 (1994), 329--347, doi:10.1006/jnth.1994.1040; (11.1), (11.2) and the statement on p. 343, the proof on pp. 343--345. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: (11.1), (11.2) and the statement were read clause by clause on the page images of the journal print. The proof was read but not checked step by step.

Proof pointer

Pp. 343--345, adapting the proof of (11.1) to finite sets. After a translation, min⁡A=1\min\mathcal A=1; with N=[av1/2]N=[a_v^{1/2}] for the largest element ava_v, the argument of Halberstam and Roth (pp. 89--90) gives some l≤Nl\le N with A(lN)≪(lN/log⁡N)1/2A(lN)\ll(lN/\log N)^{1/2}. Then at most A(lN)2A(lN)^2 sums lie in [1,lN][1,lN] while the sums span from 22 to beyond lNlN, so some gap exceeds a constant times log⁡N≫log⁡∣A∣\log N\gg\log|\mathcal A|.

Dependencies

The argument behind (11.1) in Halberstam and Roth, Sequences, pp. 89--90.

Bears on

  • Problem 158: the bound (11.1) recalled here answers the problem yes for Sidon sets, and the paper's Problem 9 asks whether it extends to sets with at most two representations. Theorem 5 itself is about finite Sidon sets and decides no case of the problem.