Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdos 1994 sum sets sidon sets i

../

problem_5: The paper's Problem 5 asks whether a finite set A with |A+A| = (1/2 + o(1))|A|^2 must have |B(A+A,d)| large, perhaps of order |A|^2, for all d, and records that the proof method of Theorem 2 does not adapt to it.

problem_7: The paper's Problem 7 asks whether some Sidon set A in {1,...,n} with |A| ≪ n^{1/3} is maximal, so that no b in {1,...,n} outside A can be added keeping the Sidon property; it is the question of Problem 156.

problem_9: The paper's Problem 9 defines B_2[g] sets, proposes extending its results to them, and asks whether every infinite B_2[2] set has liminf A(n)n^{-1/2} = 0, the question of Problem 158.

theorem_1: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's theorem that for every finite Sidon set A and every d in N more than c_1|A|^2 elements s of A+A have s-d outside A+A, so A+A splits into more than c_1|A|^2 blocks of consecutive integers.

theorem_2: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's infinite analogue of Theorem 1: for every infinite Sidon set A and every d in N, limsup over N of B(S_A,d,N)/A(N)^2 exceeds an absolute constant c_2, and c_2 = 10^{-7} can be taken.

theorem_3: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's theorem that for n > n_0 some Sidon set in {1,...,n} has a sumset meeting every window {i+1,...,i+H}, i = 0,...,n, with H at most 3n^{1/2}.

theorem_4: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's theorem that for every ε > 0 some Sidon set has sumset s_1 < s_2 < ... with s_{i+1} - s_i < s_i^{1/2}(log s_i)^{(3/2)+ε} for all i beyond some i_0, proved by the Erdős–Rényi random method.

theorem_5: Erdős, Sárközy and Sós's theorem that for an absolute c_4 > 0 every finite Sidon set A with |A| >= 2 has two consecutive elements of A+A more than c_4 log|A| apart, proved by adapting the proof of Erdős's bound (11.1).


P. Erdős, A. Sárközy, V. T. Sós, On Sum Sets of Sidon Sets, I. Journal of Number Theory 47 (1994), 329-347. doi:10.1006/jnth.1994.1040.

The paper studies the sum set S_A = A+A of a Sidon set, the extreme opposite of Freiman's near-minimal case. Theorem 1 gives a positive constant c_1 with |B(S_A,d)| >> |A|^2 for every finite Sidon set A and every d, so S_A splits into at least of order |A|^2 blocks of consecutive integers; Theorem 2 is the infinite analog, a limsup lower bound with c_2 = 10^{-7} admissible, and a greedy recursive construction shows limsup cannot be replaced by liminf. Sections 9-11 (Theorems 3-5) bound the gaps between consecutive elements of S_A, ending with the lower bound c_4 log |A| for the largest gap when A is finite with |A| >= 2 (Theorem 5, p. 343). Section 12 lists Problems 1-9. Problem 7 (p. 346) is the origin of Erdős problem 156: it asks whether there is a maximal Sidon set A in {1,...,n} with |A| << n^{1/3}, maximal meaning no b in {1,...,n} outside A can be added keeping the Sidon property. Problem 9 (pp. 346-347) is the origin of problem 158: it asks whether Erdős's bound (11.1), liminf A(n) n^{-1/2} (log n)^{1/2} < infinity for infinite Sidon sets, extends to B_2[2] and more generally B_2[g] sets, which it restates as whether every infinite B_2[2] set has liminf A(n) n^{-1/2} = 0, noting even the maximal-size asymptotics for B_2[g] sets in {1,...,n} is unknown. The paper poses both questions rather than resolving them.

Source: https://doi.org/10.1006/jnth.1994.1040. The copy read for this card is the publisher's scan, which prints "Copyright © 1994 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved." at the foot of its first page (p. 329; read on the page image, as the scan has no text layer), every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked. The statements of Theorems 1 to 5, the definitions on pp. 329--330 and 337, (11.1) and Problems 5, 7 and 9 were read clause by clause on the page images of the journal print; the proofs of Theorems 2 to 5 were read but not checked step by step.

Bears on.

  • #156: Problem 7 (p. 346) is this problem, with ∣A∣≪n1/3|A|\ll n^{1/3} for O(N1/3)O(N^{1/3}). The paper poses it and does not resolve it.
  • #158: the question that closes Problem 9 (p. 347) is this problem. The paper recalls Erdős's bound (11.1) (p. 343), which answers it yes for Sidon sets, poses the case of two representations and does not resolve it.
  • #864: sets of this problem whose size tends to infinity meet the nearly Sidon hypothesis of Problem 5 (p. 346), a deduction recorded on that page. Problem 5 asks about the sumset's block structure, not the set's size, and is unresolved; the paper's Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 need Sidon sets. The paper gives no bound for the problem.

Results.

  • Theorem 1 (p. 330): there is c1>0c_1>0 such that every finite Sidon set AA and every d∈Nd\in\mathbb N satisfy ∣B(SA,d)∣>c1∣A∣2|\mathcal B(S_A,d)|>c_1|A|^2; with d=1d=1, SAS_A has ≫∣A∣2\gg|A|^2 blocks of consecutive integers.
  • Theorem 2 (p. 331): for every infinite Sidon set AA and every dd, lim sup⁡NB(SA,d,N)A(N)−2>c2\limsup_N B(S_A,d,N)A(N)^{-2}>c_2, an absolute constant, and c2=10−7c_2=10^{-7} can be taken; the limsup cannot be replaced by a liminf.
  • Theorem 3 (p. 337): H(n)≤3n1/2H(n)\le3n^{1/2} for n>n0n>n_0.
  • Theorem 4 (p. 338): for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 some Sidon set has si+1−si<si1/2(log⁡si)(3/2)+εs_{i+1}-s_i<s_i^{1/2}(\log s_i)^{(3/2)+\varepsilon} for i>i0i>i_0.
  • Theorem 5 (p. 343): there is an absolute c4>0c_4>0 such that every finite Sidon set with ∣A∣≥2|A|\ge2 has a sumset gap above c4log⁡∣A∣c_4\log|A|.
  • Problem 5 (p. 346): whether sets with ∣SA∣=(12+o(1))∣A∣2|S_A|=(\frac12+o(1))|A|^2 must have ∣B(SA,d)∣|\mathcal B(S_A,d)| large for all dd.
  • Problem 7 (p. 346): whether a maximal Sidon set in {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} can have ∣A∣≪n1/3|A|\ll n^{1/3}.
  • Problem 9 (pp. 346--347): extending the results to B2[g]B_2[g] sets, and whether every infinite B2[2]B_2[2] set has lim inf⁡A(n)n−1/2=0\liminf A(n)n^{-1/2}=0.

Overview

The paper studies the spacing and additive structure of the sumset SA=A+AS_A=A+A of a Sidon set, where every unordered pair from AA has a distinct sum. Equation (2.1) (p. 329) records the extremal sumset bound that characterizes this setting. Theorem 1 (p. 330) asserts that, for every finite Sidon set AA and every positive integer dd, more than c1∣A∣2c_1|A|^2 elements of SAS_A have no predecessor at distance dd in SAS_A. Theorem 2, equation (3.2) (p. 331), gives an infinite-set analogue with a limsup normalized by A(N)2A(N)^2; the authors state that the constant may be 10−710^{-7} and give a construction showing why a liminf cannot replace the limsup (p. 331). They supply the proof of Theorem 2, using Parseval’s formula on (1−zd)f(z)2(1-z^d)f(z)^2, a lower bound from elements of AA lacking a predecessor at distance dd (equations (6.1)–(6.4), pp. 333–334), and an upper bound from the assumed scarcity of such elements in SAS_A (equations (7.1)–(7.13), pp. 334–336). The finite proof is omitted.

For gaps in SAS_A, Theorem 3 (pp. 337–338) constructs, for every n>n0n>n_0, a Sidon set in [n][n] whose sumset meets every interval [i+1,i+H][i+1,i+H], 0≤i≤n0\leq i\leq n, with H≤3nH\leq 3\sqrt n; the construction uses the least residues of squares modulo a prime. Theorem 4 (pp. 338–342) constructs, for each ε>0\varepsilon>0, an infinite Sidon set with successive sumset gaps below si1/2(log⁡si)3/2+εs_i^{1/2}(\log s_i)^{3/2+\varepsilon} eventually. Its probabilistic proof selects integers independently, applies Borel–Cantelli to eventual uniqueness of sums and occupancy of prescribed intervals (Lemmas 1 and 2, pp. 339–342), then removes an initial segment. In the opposite direction, Theorem 5 (pp. 343–345) gives a gap exceeding clog⁡∣A∣c\log|A| for every finite Sidon set of size at least two; its proof adapts a cited density argument. The stronger gap estimates proposed after Theorems 3 and 4, and the questions in §12 (pp. 345–347), are conjectural or open. In particular, Problem 7 (p. 346) asks whether there is an inclusion-maximal Sidon set in [n][n] of size O(n1/3)O(n^{1/3}).

Relation to E156

This source bears on Problem 156.

Problem 7 (p. 346) is E156: with [N]={1,…,N}[N]=\{1,\ldots,N\}, it asks whether some Sidon A⊂[N]A\subset[N] has ∣A∣=O(N1/3)|A|=O(N^{1/3}) and no b∈[N]∖Ab\in[N]\setminus A can be adjoined. In the paper’s notation SA=A+AS_A=A+A, this maximality condition is equivalent to saying that every such bb satisfies either 2b∈SA2b\in S_A or (b+A)∩SA≠∅(b+A)\cap S_A\ne\varnothing: each condition creates a repeated sum upon adjoining bb. Consequently, equation (2.1) gives the elementary necessary bound N≤∣A∣+(∣A∣+1)∣SA∣≤∣A∣+∣A∣(∣A∣+1)2/2N\leq |A|+(|A|+1)|S_A|\leq |A|+|A|(|A|+1)^2/2, hence ∣A∣=Ω(N1/3)|A|=\Omega(N^{1/3}). This is a deduction from the paper’s definition and sumset count, not its construction of a set at that scale.

Theorem 1 (p. 330) supplies a uniform lower bound on boundaries of SAS_A under every fixed shift; it could constrain a proposed construction’s sumset, but it gives no coverage of the candidates bb in the maximality condition. Theorem 3 (pp. 337–338) constructs a set with relatively small gaps in SAS_A, at a scale of roughly N\sqrt N elements, and does not establish inclusion-maximality. Theorems 2, 4, and 5 concern infinite sets or sumset gaps and likewise do not supply the required O(N1/3)O(N^{1/3}) maximal set. The paper poses E156 rather than resolving it.

Relation to E864

This source bears on Problem 864.

The notation used below: SA=A+A\mathcal S_{\mathcal A}=\mathcal A+\mathcal A is the sumset of a Sidon set A\mathcal A, in which every unordered pair, including diagonal pairs, has a distinct sum; B(X,d)={x∈X:x−d∉X}\mathcal B(X,d)=\{x\in X:x-d\notin X\}; and Theorem 1 (p. 330) gives ∣B(SA,d)∣>c1∣A∣2|\mathcal B(\mathcal S_{\mathcal A},d)|>c_1|\mathcal A|^2 for every finite Sidon set and every positive dd. The passages used for E864 are Theorem 1 (p. 330), Theorem 2 with equation (3.2) (p. 331), Theorems 3–5 (pp. 337–345), and §12 (pp. 345–347), in particular the extension to ‘nearly’ Sidon sets proposed as Problem 5 (p. 346) and the extension to B2[g]B_2[g] sets in Problem 9 (pp. 346–347); the authors state on p. 346 that the proof method of Theorem 2 does not adapt to Problem 5, and cite the standard Sidon size estimate in Problem 9 (p. 347).

In E864 notation, rA(s)r_A(s) counts exactly the unordered representations used in this paper. If m=∣A∣m=|A| and s0s_0 is its sole sum with rA(s0)≥2r_A(s_0)\ge2, put r=rA(s0)r=r_A(s_0). Then ∣SA∣=(m+12)−(r−1)|S_A|=\binom{m+1}{2}-(r-1) and r≤⌊(m+1)/2⌋r\le\lfloor(m+1)/2\rfloor, so every E864 set satisfies the near-Sidon sumset-size hypothesis discussed in §12, Problem 5 (p. 346). That problem is explicitly unresolved here; the authors also say the proof method of Theorem 2 does not adapt to it.

Deleting one element from each of r−1r-1 disjoint pairs representing s0s_0 leaves a Sidon subset of size m−r+1m-r+1. Theorem 1 can therefore be applied to that subset’s sumset, but its block bound does not transfer automatically to SAS_A: the deleted elements can fill gaps. The standard Sidon size estimate cited in §12, Problem 9 (p. 347) gives at most (1+o(1))N(1+o(1))\sqrt N for this subset. Thus this route provides little control when rr is of order N\sqrt N, the regime relevant to E864’s proposed 2/32/\sqrt3 constant. Theorems 3–5 concern sumset gaps, and Problem 9 concerns a uniform bound rA(s)≤gr_A(s)\le g; neither supplies an upper bound for E864, where the one exceptional multiplicity may grow with NN. The paper is useful chiefly as a source of sumset methods and as an explicit record of their stated limit for nearly Sidon sets.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.