Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
For the paper sets (display (21), p. 2105)
where is the largest size of over -subsets of (see Theorem 2). Whether the limit exists is Problem 11 (p. 2105). The Erdős–Freud construction gives for (display (22)). Lemma 12 (p. 2105, display (23)):
The two expressions agree at , and the first equals at (a check made here).
Source. Oleg Pikhurko, Dense edge-magic graphs and thin additive bases, Discrete Mathematics 306 (2006), 2097–2107, doi:10.1016/j.disc.2006.05.003; Lemma 12 on p. 2105, proof on pp. 2105–2106.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read on the publisher's PDF. The proof was not checked, and the paper itself omits the final computation of the integral (24) ("lengthy calculations (omitted)", p. 2106).
Proof outline
Put and take a Sidon set with elements, . The construction, which the paper says it borrows from Erdős and Freud, is the union of and its reflection , here with independent random shifts: with uniform in . Lemma 10 gives the local densities of and , where and , and inclusion–exclusion bounds the expected size of from below by an integral (24) of explicit piecewise polynomials, whose break points change order at . For some choice of the size of is at least its expectation.
Dependencies
Bears on
- Problem 819: the unrefereed 2026 note on the claim page Liu's lower bound 0.469 says its randomly shifted reflected construction is inspired by this lemma. Lemma 12 bounds the whole sumset of a subset of , not the number of sums in that the problem counts, and gives no bound on .