Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Pikhurko 2006 dense edge magic graphs thin additive
lemma_10: Shows that a Sidon subset of the first n integers of size (1 + o(1)) n^(1/2) meets every subinterval and residue class in its proportional share, up to o(n^(1/2)).
lemma_12: Gives lower bounds on the scaled largest sumset s(c) for 2/sqrt 3 <= c <= 2 by randomly shifting a Sidon set and its reflection.
theorem_1: Bounds the maximum number of edges of an edge-magic graph of order n between (2/7)n^2 + O(n) and (0.489... + o(1))n^2.
theorem_2: Bounds s(k, n), the largest sumset of a k-subset of the first n integers, by n + k^2 (1/4 - 1/(pi+2)^2 + o(1)).
theorem_3: Bounds the size of a quasi-Sidon subset of the first n integers by (1.863... + o(1)) n^(1/2), improving the trivial constant 2.
theorem_4: Shows that the complete graph on n vertices has an edge-magic injection with magic sum at most (288/121 + o(1)) n^2, improving Wood's (3 + o(1)) n^2.
theorem_8: Bounds the number of sums of a set of integers that land in [2n], allowing some elements outside [n]; the general form of Theorem 2.
Oleg Pikhurko, Dense edge-magic graphs and thin additive bases. Discrete Mathematics 306 (2006), 2097-2107. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2006.05.003. The copy read for this card, the publisher's PDF, prints "© 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved." on its first page, every other right reserved.
Pikhurko studies M(n), the maximum number of edges of an edge-magic graph of order n, and proves in Theorem 1 that (2/7)n^2 + O(n) <= M(n) <= (0.489... + o(1)) n^2, the first upper bound of the form (1 - epsilon) times n choose 2. The bounds go through s(k, n), the largest possible sumset size of a k-subset of [n]: Theorem 2 gives s(k, n) <= n + k^2 (1/4 - 1/(pi+2)^2 + o(1)), proved by adapting Moser's additive-basis method, and the lower bound in Theorem 1 uses explicit thin additive bases. Theorem 3, the material result for problem 840, deduces that any quasi-Sidon set A in [n] (one with |A + A| = (1 + o(1)) binom(|A|, 2)) satisfies |A| <= ((1/4 + 1/(pi+2)^2)^(-1/2) + o(1)) n^(1/2) = (1.863... + o(1)) n^(1/2), improving on the trivial bound 2 n^(1/2) and superseding the unpublished 1.98 bound promised by Erdos and Freud, who had constructed quasi-Sidon sets of size (2/sqrt 3 + o(1)) n^(1/2) = (1.154... + o(1)) n^(1/2). Theorem 4 bounds the edge-magic injection number I(K_n) <= (288/121 + o(1)) n^2 = (2.380... + o(1)) n^2, Theorem 8 gives a generalized bound with lambda = 0.323... for sets A with at least lambda |A \ [n]| elements in [n], and Lemma 10 shows that a Sidon subset of [n] of size (1 + o(1)) n^(1/2) meets each residue class inside each subinterval in its proportional share up to o(n^(1/2)). The paper explains explicitly how the quasi-Sidon question relates to the harder s(k, n) problem.
Source: https://opikhurko.warwick.ac.uk/E/Pikhurko06dm.pdf.
Result pages. Each records the statement as printed, a proof outline and its read depth (claims checked; no proof checked).
- Theorem 1 (p. 2098): bounds on , the maximum size of an edge-magic graph of order .
- Theorem 2 (p. 2098): the upper bound on .
- Theorem 3 (p. 2099): the quasi-Sidon bound .
- Theorem 4 (p. 2099): edge-magic injections of .
- Theorem 8 (p. 2101): the sumset bound allowing elements outside , from whose case Theorem 2 follows.
- Lemma 10 (p. 2104): equidistribution of asymptotically maximum Sidon sets in subintervals and residue classes.
- Lemma 12 (p. 2105): lower bounds on the scaled from randomly shifted reflected Sidon sets.
Bears on.
- #840: Theorem 3 bounds the largest quasi-Sidon subset of by ; with the Erdős–Freud construction of elements, which the paper restates (p. 2098), the largest such set has between and elements; the paper does not determine its growth.
- #864: by the argument under Relation to E864 below, Theorem 2 gives for the problem's sets, an upper bound above the constant the problem asks about.
- #819: Lemma 10 and the reflected construction of Lemma 12 are inputs that an unrefereed 2026 note on that problem names; the paper itself states no bound on the problem's .
Overview
Pikhurko studies the maximum edge count of an edge-magic graph and, as an additive counterpart, (§1, pp. 2097–2098). Theorem 1 gives (equation (1), p. 2098). For the lower bound, Lemma 5 turns a long interval in the restricted sumset into an edge-magic graph; the paper applies a cited construction of Mrose and then Lemma 6 (pp. 2100–2101). For the upper bound, Theorem 9 bounds the length of an interval almost covered by , and equation (18) applies that bound to the vertex labels of an edge-magic graph (pp. 2103–2104).
The central additive estimate is Theorem 2, (equation (3), p. 2098). It follows from the more general Theorem 8, which permits elements of outside under a stated condition on their number (equation (8), pp. 2101–2102). The proof adapts Moser’s generating-function method: representation counts, roots of unity, and a Fourier series bound the sums missing from (equations (9)–(14), pp. 2101–2102). Theorem 3 consequently bounds a quasi-Sidon subset of —one with —by (p. 2099). The quasi-Sidon construction in equation (4) is attributed to Erdős and Freud, rather than proved as a theorem of this paper (p. 2098).
Other results locate the paper’s scope: Theorem 4 improves the magic-sum bound for injections of complete graphs (equation (5), pp. 2099–2100); Lemma 10 proves interval and residue-class equidistribution for asymptotically maximum Sidon subsets (equation (19), pp. 2104–2105); and §7 gives lower bounds for scaled by reflected Sidon sets and arithmetic progressions (Lemmas 12–13, equations (23) and (26), pp. 2105–2107). Problems 7 and 11 ask whether the respective scaled extremal quantities have limits (pp. 2101, 2105); they are questions, not results.
Relation to E864
This source bears on Problem 864.
For E864, set , , and use the paper’s for the sums counted by . If at most one sum repeats, then , where : distinct unordered representations of a fixed sum use disjoint elements. Since , this first gives . Substituting into Theorem 2 (equation (3), p. 2098) yields the usable upper bound
Equivalently, E864 sets in this range satisfy the paper’s quasi-Sidon condition, so Theorem 3 applies (p. 2099). This is weaker than E864’s target constant . Theorem 8 offers a possible bound for an argument that splits a set across an interval, while Lemma 10 applies only to asymptotically maximum Sidon sets; neither establishes the target upper bound. The reflected sets of §7 are analyzed there for , not for having at most one repeated sum. Thus the paper supplies a sumset method and a quantitative upper bound for E864, but does not prove its proposed asymptotic value.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.