Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Redman 2021 small maximal sidon set z 2
theorem_2_3: Redman, Rose and Walker show that the Sidon set S_(2n) = {(x, x^3) : x in F_(2^n)}, viewed inside Z_2^(2n), covers every point outside it, as a sum of three distinct elements of S_(2n), at least Omega(2^n) times.
theorem_3_1: Redman, Rose and Walker construct, in the group Z_2^n, a maximal Sidon set S with |S| = O((n 2^n)^(1/3)), the group analogue of Ruzsa's small maximal Sidon set in the integers.
Maximus Redman, Lauren Rose, Raphael Walker, A Small Maximal Sidon Set in Z_2^n. arXiv preprint (2021). arXiv:2109.00292. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2109.00292), every other right reserved.
Published as SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 36(3) (2022), 1861-1867, doi:10.1137/21M1454663. The copy read for this card is arXiv:2109.00292v3 (9 April 2022, 7 pages); the page numbers cited in the Overview and Relation sections below are that copy's.
Theorem 3.1 (p. 5) constructs a maximal Sidon set S in Z_2^n with |S| = O((n 2^n)^(1/3)), matching in form Ruzsa's O((N log N)^(1/3)) maximal Sidon set in [1, N]. Here a Sidon set in Z_2^n is one whose sums of distinct pairs are all different (p. 1). The construction starts from the BCH-code Sidon set S_n = {(x, x^3) : x in F_(2^(n/2))} inside F_(2^(n/2))^2 = Z_2^n for even n (Proposition 2.1, p. 2, proved by citing Bose and Ray-Chaudhuri) and shows in Theorem 2.3 (p. 2) that S_(2n) covers every point of Z_2^(2n) outside itself at least Omega(2^n) times; Ruzsa's argument is then run through a quotient Z_2^n / Q with Q isomorphic to Z_2^(n-m), m the least even integer exceeding (2/3) log_2(T ln(2) n 2^n). Combined with the counting lower bound the paper concludes Omega((2^n)^(1/3)) <= |S| <= O((n 2^n)^(1/3)) for the smallest maximal Sidon set in Z_2^n (p. 7), and reports that Bennett-Bohman random greedy estimates predict the upper bound to be best possible. The paper treats only the group Z_2^n; it proves nothing about maximal Sidon sets in the integer interval [1, N].
Read status: claims checked for the results linked below, statements read clause by clause on the printed pages of arXiv v3; no proof is checked step by step.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00292.
Bears on.
- #156: the problem asks for a maximal Sidon set of size O(N^(1/3)) in {1,...,N}. Theorem 3.1 gives, in the group Z_2^n with N = 2^n, a maximal Sidon set of size O((N log N)^(1/3)), the same form as Ruzsa's integer bound; maximality in Z_2^n says nothing about maximality in {1,...,N}, and the paper does not address the problem as posed.
Results.
- Theorem 3.1 (p. 5): There exists a maximal Sidon set S in Z_2^n with |S| = O((n 2^n)^(1/3)); the page also records the concluding bounds Omega((2^n)^(1/3)) <= |S| <= O((n 2^n)^(1/3)) for the smallest maximal Sidon set (p. 7).
- Theorem 2.3 (p. 2): The Sidon set S_(2n) = {(x, x^3) : x in F_(2^n)} covers every point of Z_2^(2n) outside it at least Omega(2^n) times, with the explicit bound (2^n - 2 sqrt(2^n) - 2)/6 from the proof (p. 4).
- Proposition 2.1 (p. 2), not given a page since the paper proves it by citation: S_n = {(x, x^3) : x in F_(2^(n/2))} is a Sidon set for all even n >= 1.
Overview
The paper asks how small a maximal Sidon set can be in , where “Sidon” means that sums of distinct pairs are unique; the usual definition in Definition 1.1 would allow only singleton sets in this group (Introduction, p. 1). Proposition 2.1 (p. 2), citing [BR60], supplies the Sidon set of size . Theorem 2.3 (pp. 2–4) proves that every point outside has representations as a sum of three distinct elements of . Its proof counts points on an absolutely irreducible plane cubic, using a genus bound and a rational-point estimate; it gives the explicit lower bound for the number of unordered triples. The exact count for certain odd is reported only as a computation and conjecture (p. 4).
Theorem 3.1 (pp. 5–7) constructs a maximal Sidon set of size . It lifts the set from Proposition 2.1 through a quotient by choosing independent random coset representatives. The disjoint triples supplied by Theorem 2.3 give independent chances to cover each point outside the selected quotient cosets; a union bound yields a lift covering all such points. Extending that lift to a maximal set adds at most elements (proof of Theorem 3.1, pp. 5–6). The elementary lower bound , hence , appears in Section 3 (p. 5). The integer bound of Ruzsa and the discussion of random greedy behavior are cited background, not results proved here (Section 3, pp. 5, 7).
Relation to E156
This source bears on Problem 156.
For E156, must be maximal within the interval and have size . With , Theorem 3.1 instead gives in the group . Its quotient construction suggests a possible ingredient for E156: find a smaller Sidon set with many disjoint triple representations of each point, lift it, and use those representations to force maximality. In the paper’s argument each triple hits a specified lift with probability ; covering all points by the union bound requires roughly chances per point (proof of Theorem 3.1, pp. 5–6). This is where its logarithmic factor enters. The paper supplies neither an interval analog of that lifting argument nor a way to remove the factor. Group maximality does not establish maximality for a Sidon set in , so it does not resolve E156.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.