Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Ruzsa 1998 small maximal sidon set

../

lemma_p56: Ruzsa's unnumbered Lemma: for a Sidon set B of size p+1 modulo q = 1+p+p^2 and m not congruent to any element of B, the congruence m = b_u + b_v - b_w mod q has at least p/8 solutions with pairwise disjoint index sets.

theorem_p55: Ruzsa's unnumbered Theorem: there is a maximal Sidon set A in [1,N] with |A| at most a constant times (N log N)^(1/3).


Imre Z. Ruzsa, A Small Maximal Sidon Set. The Ramanujan Journal 2 (1998), 55-58. doi:10.1023/A:1009757824153.

A finite Sidon set A in [1,N] is maximal if adding any other integer of [1,N] destroys the Sidon property; a counting argument forces |A| to be at least of order N^{1/3}, and Erdos, Sarkozy and Sos asked whether that can be improved. The Theorem shows it is nearly optimal: there is a maximal Sidon set in [1,N] with |A| << (N log N)^{1/3}, that is, at most a constant times (N log N)^{1/3}. The construction takes a prime p of size about (N log N)^{1/3}, sets q = 1 + p + p^2, uses a perfect difference (Singer) Sidon set B = {b_0,...,b_p} modulo q, and lifts it to A_0 = {b_i + d_i q} with the shifts d_i chosen at random from 0,...,M-1 where M = [N/q]; a Lemma provides at least p/8 pairwise disjoint triplets (u,v,w) solving the blocking congruence m = b_u + b_v - b_w mod q, and a probabilistic estimate shows that for some choice of shifts A_0 blocks every m in [1,N] not congruent mod q to an element of B, so that extending A_0 to a maximal Sidon set adds few elements. The method is the random-shift lift of a modular perfect difference set. For problem 156 this is the construction the attack aims to improve, the gap being exactly the (log N)^{1/3} factor between the trivial N^{1/3} lower bound and this (N log N)^{1/3} upper bound.

The copy read for this card is the journal PDF, printed pp. 55–58. That copy prints "© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands." on its first page, every other right reserved.

Bears on.

  • #156: the problem asks whether a maximal Sidon set in {1,...,N} of size O(N^{1/3}) exists; the Theorem (p. 55) gives one of size O((N log N)^{1/3}), and the Remark's display (4) (p. 57) records the lower bound g(N) >> N^{1/3}. The (log N)^{1/3} factor remains and the paper does not answer the question.

Results.

  • Theorem (p. 55): There is a maximal Sidon set A in [1,N] with |A| << (N log N)^{1/3}; the Remark (pp. 57-58) records N^{1/3} << g(N) << (N log N)^{1/3} for the least size g(N).
  • Lemma (p. 56): If m is not congruent to any b_i mod q, the congruence m = b_u + b_v - b_w mod q has I >= p/8 solutions (u_i,v_i,w_i) with pairwise disjoint index sets.

Overview

Page numbers are the printed pages of the journal PDF read for this card (printed pp. 55–58 = PDF pp. 1–4), read in its text layer. In the paper a Sidon set is a set of integers whose pairwise sums a+a′a+a' (a,a′∈Aa,a'\in A) are all different, and a finite Sidon set A⊆[1,N]A\subseteq[1,N] is maximal for NN when no Sidon set A′⊆[1,N]A'\subseteq[1,N] properly contains it (p. 55). An easy counting argument gives ∣A∣≫N1/3|A|\gg N^{1/3} for every maximal Sidon set; the question of improving this lower bound is credited to Erdős, Sárközy and Sós [2] (p. 55). The paper's one result is the unnumbered Theorem (p. 55): there is a maximal Sidon set in [1,N][1,N] with ∣A∣≪(Nlog⁡N)1/3|A|\ll(N\log N)^{1/3}, so the counting bound is not far from optimal.

The proof (pp. 55–57) selects a prime pp of order (Nlog⁡N)1/3(N\log N)^{1/3}, puts q=1+p+p2q=1+p+p^2, and takes a Sidon set B={b0,…,bp}⊆[1,q]B=\{b_0,\ldots,b_p\}\subseteq[1,q] of size p+1p+1 modulo qq (cited to Halberstam–Roth [3]). For any integers d0,…,dpd_0,\ldots,d_p the lifts ai=bi+diqa_i=b_i+d_iq form a Sidon set A0A_0, contained in [1,N][1,N] when 0≤di≤M−10\le d_i\le M-1, M=[N/q]M=[N/q] (pp. 55–56). An integer mm can be added to A0A_0 while keeping the Sidon property if and only if neither m=au+av−awm=a_u+a_v-a_w nor 2m=au+av2m=a_u+a_v has a solution (equation (1), p. 56), and (1) forces m≡bu+bv−bw(modq)m\equiv b_u+b_v-b_w\pmod q (equation (2), p. 56). The Lemma (p. 56) shows that if m≢bi(modq)m\not\equiv b_i\pmod q for every ii, then (2) has at least p/8p/8 solutions (ui,vi,wi)(u_i,v_i,w_i) with pairwise disjoint index sets, because the differences bi−bjb_i-b_j represent every nonzero residue exactly once, so (2) has at least pp solutions (exactly one for each first index uu), and each selected triplet excludes at most eight. The did_i are then chosen independently and uniformly from {0,…,M−1}\{0,\ldots,M-1\}; for a fixed disjoint triplet, (1) reduces to du+dv−dw=m′d_u+d_v-d_w=m' with −1≤m′≤M+1-1\le m'\le M+1 (equation (3), pp. 56–57), an event of probability at least c/Mc/M for an absolute c>0c>0 once M>M0M>M_0. Independence over the ≥p/8\ge p/8 disjoint triplets gives P((1) unsolvable for m)≤e−cp/(8M)≤exp⁡(−cp3/(8N))P(\text{(1) unsolvable for }m)\le e^{-cp/(8M)}\le\exp(-cp^3/(8N)), which is below 1/N1/N once p>(CNlog⁡N)1/3p>(CN\log N)^{1/3} with C=8/cC=8/c; Chebyshev's theorem supplies such a prime with p≪(Nlog⁡N)1/3p\ll(N\log N)^{1/3} (p. 57). Summing over the at most NN values of mm, with positive probability every m≢bu(modq)m\not\equiv b_u\pmod q is blocked. Any Sidon set A⊇A0A\supseteq A_0 in [1,N][1,N] then consists of A0A_0 and elements a≡bu(modq)a\equiv b_u\pmod q; for these the numbers a−aua-a_u are distinct multiples of qq in (1−N,N−1)(1-N,N-1), so extending A0A_0 to a maximal Sidon set adds at most 1+2N/q≪N1/31+2N/q\ll N^{1/3} elements, and ∣A∣≪(Nlog⁡N)1/3|A|\ll(N\log N)^{1/3} (p. 57).

The closing Remark (pp. 57–58) writes g(N)g(N) for the least size of a maximal Sidon set in [1,N][1,N], records N1/3≪g(N)≪(Nlog⁡N)1/3N^{1/3}\ll g(N)\ll(N\log N)^{1/3} (display (4), p. 57), notes that if the right side were the truth it would immediately give the Ajtai–Komlós–Szemerédi infinite Sidon set with ≫(Nlog⁡N)1/3\gg(N\log N)^{1/3} elements up to NN [1], and says that the author has no heuristic argument indicating which side of (4) is correct (p. 58).

Relation to E156

This source bears on Problem 156.

For E156, Ruzsa’s AA has exactly the required relative maximality: every x∈[1,N]∖Ax\in[1,N]\setminus A creates a repeated unordered two term sum in A∪{x}A\cup\{x\}. The Theorem (p. 55) supplies the upper bound g(N)≪N1/3(log⁡N)1/3g(N)\ll N^{1/3}(\log N)^{1/3}, and display (4) (p. 57) records the elementary lower bound g(N)≫N1/3g(N)\gg N^{1/3}. It therefore establishes a near match to E156’s requested O(N1/3)O(N^{1/3}) bound, but does not remove the logarithmic factor or resolve the stated problem. The logarithm enters at one point of the construction (p. 57): the failure probability exp⁡(−cp3/(8N))\exp(-cp^3/(8N)) for a single integer mm must be beaten by a union bound over the NN values of mm, which forces p3≫Nlog⁡Np^3\gg N\log N and hence ∣A0∣=p+1≫(Nlog⁡N)1/3|A_0|=p+1\gg(N\log N)^{1/3}, while the extension to a maximal set costs only O(N1/3)O(N^{1/3}). Removing the factor would need either a blocking argument that is not a union bound over mm or a different way of forcing maximality; the paper's Remark (p. 58) offers no guess as to which side of (4) is the truth.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.