Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Ruzsa 1998 small maximal sidon set
lemma_p56: Ruzsa's unnumbered Lemma: for a Sidon set B of size p+1 modulo q = 1+p+p^2 and m not congruent to any element of B, the congruence m = b_u + b_v - b_w mod q has at least p/8 solutions with pairwise disjoint index sets.
theorem_p55: Ruzsa's unnumbered Theorem: there is a maximal Sidon set A in [1,N] with |A| at most a constant times (N log N)^(1/3).
Imre Z. Ruzsa, A Small Maximal Sidon Set. The Ramanujan Journal 2 (1998), 55-58. doi:10.1023/A:1009757824153.
A finite Sidon set A in [1,N] is maximal if adding any other integer of [1,N] destroys the Sidon property; a counting argument forces |A| to be at least of order N^{1/3}, and Erdos, Sarkozy and Sos asked whether that can be improved. The Theorem shows it is nearly optimal: there is a maximal Sidon set in [1,N] with |A| << (N log N)^{1/3}, that is, at most a constant times (N log N)^{1/3}. The construction takes a prime p of size about (N log N)^{1/3}, sets q = 1 + p + p^2, uses a perfect difference (Singer) Sidon set B = {b_0,...,b_p} modulo q, and lifts it to A_0 = {b_i + d_i q} with the shifts d_i chosen at random from 0,...,M-1 where M = [N/q]; a Lemma provides at least p/8 pairwise disjoint triplets (u,v,w) solving the blocking congruence m = b_u + b_v - b_w mod q, and a probabilistic estimate shows that for some choice of shifts A_0 blocks every m in [1,N] not congruent mod q to an element of B, so that extending A_0 to a maximal Sidon set adds few elements. The method is the random-shift lift of a modular perfect difference set. For problem 156 this is the construction the attack aims to improve, the gap being exactly the (log N)^{1/3} factor between the trivial N^{1/3} lower bound and this (N log N)^{1/3} upper bound.
The copy read for this card is the journal PDF, printed pp. 55–58. That copy prints "© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands." on its first page, every other right reserved.
Bears on.
- #156: the problem asks whether a maximal Sidon set in {1,...,N} of size O(N^{1/3}) exists; the Theorem (p. 55) gives one of size O((N log N)^{1/3}), and the Remark's display (4) (p. 57) records the lower bound g(N) >> N^{1/3}. The (log N)^{1/3} factor remains and the paper does not answer the question.
Results.
- Theorem (p. 55): There is a maximal Sidon set A in [1,N] with |A| << (N log N)^{1/3}; the Remark (pp. 57-58) records N^{1/3} << g(N) << (N log N)^{1/3} for the least size g(N).
- Lemma (p. 56): If m is not congruent to any b_i mod q, the congruence m = b_u + b_v - b_w mod q has I >= p/8 solutions (u_i,v_i,w_i) with pairwise disjoint index sets.
Overview
Page numbers are the printed pages of the journal PDF read for this card (printed pp. 55–58 = PDF pp. 1–4), read in its text layer. In the paper a Sidon set is a set of integers whose pairwise sums () are all different, and a finite Sidon set is maximal for when no Sidon set properly contains it (p. 55). An easy counting argument gives for every maximal Sidon set; the question of improving this lower bound is credited to Erdős, Sárközy and Sós [2] (p. 55). The paper's one result is the unnumbered Theorem (p. 55): there is a maximal Sidon set in with , so the counting bound is not far from optimal.
The proof (pp. 55–57) selects a prime of order , puts , and takes a Sidon set of size modulo (cited to Halberstam–Roth [3]). For any integers the lifts form a Sidon set , contained in when , (pp. 55–56). An integer can be added to while keeping the Sidon property if and only if neither nor has a solution (equation (1), p. 56), and (1) forces (equation (2), p. 56). The Lemma (p. 56) shows that if for every , then (2) has at least solutions with pairwise disjoint index sets, because the differences represent every nonzero residue exactly once, so (2) has at least solutions (exactly one for each first index ), and each selected triplet excludes at most eight. The are then chosen independently and uniformly from ; for a fixed disjoint triplet, (1) reduces to with (equation (3), pp. 56–57), an event of probability at least for an absolute once . Independence over the disjoint triplets gives , which is below once with ; Chebyshev's theorem supplies such a prime with (p. 57). Summing over the at most values of , with positive probability every is blocked. Any Sidon set in then consists of and elements ; for these the numbers are distinct multiples of in , so extending to a maximal Sidon set adds at most elements, and (p. 57).
The closing Remark (pp. 57–58) writes for the least size of a maximal Sidon set in , records (display (4), p. 57), notes that if the right side were the truth it would immediately give the Ajtai–Komlós–Szemerédi infinite Sidon set with elements up to [1], and says that the author has no heuristic argument indicating which side of (4) is correct (p. 58).
Relation to E156
This source bears on Problem 156.
For E156, Ruzsa’s has exactly the required relative maximality: every creates a repeated unordered two term sum in . The Theorem (p. 55) supplies the upper bound , and display (4) (p. 57) records the elementary lower bound . It therefore establishes a near match to E156’s requested bound, but does not remove the logarithmic factor or resolve the stated problem. The logarithm enters at one point of the construction (p. 57): the failure probability for a single integer must be beaten by a union bound over the values of , which forces and hence , while the extension to a maximal set costs only . Removing the factor would need either a blocking argument that is not a union bound over or a different way of forcing maximality; the paper's Remark (p. 58) offers no guess as to which side of (4) is the truth.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.