Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Printed p. 188: "Denote by the largest integer so that from any set of real numbers one can always select of them so that no is the sum of other 's." After the definition of (the of inequality (31)): "By the same method as we used in the proof of Theorem 2 we can show
and (31) . In the proof of (30) is the set for which is between and , in the proof of (31) is the set for which is between and . (30) and (31) are probably far from being best possible. It is known that [5] and by complicated arguments we can show that , very likely for some ."
The printed bound is , the site's for Problem 790. The claim is withdrawn in the 1973 survey ("I claimed , but have difficulties in reconstructing my proof", printed p. 130 of Section 9).
Source. P. Erdős, Extremal problems in number theory, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. VIII (Theory of Numbers), Amer. Math. Soc. (1965), 181--189, DOI 10.1090/pspum/008/0174539; printed p. 188 (PDF p. 8 of the eleven-page scan read for this page), read on the page image (the radicals at 300 dpi); the site's key [Er65, p. 188] for Problem 790.
Read depth. Claims checked: the definition, (30) and the surrounding sentences were read clause by clause on the page image. The proof of (30) is the one-sentence indication quoted above; the claim is asserted without proof and later withdrawn.
Proof pointer
The sentence quoted above: the rotation argument of Theorem 2 with the interval modulo , of length , in which no sum of between two and points of the interval can lie (such a sum falls in ), which covers any selection of at most points; the expected number of with in it is . Not reconstructed further here.
Dependencies
The method of Theorem 2 (the measure estimate (28) for the sets ).
Bears on
- Problem 790: the origin of the problem's (here , for reals), the first lower bound that the site quotes, and the claim the site records as withdrawn.