Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Theorem 5 (p. 53). Let ε>0\varepsilon>0, let 2=p1,p2,…2=p_1,p_2,\ldots be the primes in order, and let l≥2l\ge2 be an integer. There is a number s0(ε,l)s_0(\varepsilon,l), effectively computable in terms of ε\varepsilon and ll, such that for every integer s≥s0(ε,l)s\ge s_0(\varepsilon,l) there is a monic polynomial F(X)F(X) of degree ll with distinct roots and rational integer coefficients for which the equation

(15)F(x)=p1z1⋯pszs\text{(15)}\qquad F(x)=p_1^{z_1}\cdots p_s^{z_s}

has at least

(16)exp⁡{(l2−ε)s1/l(log⁡s)(l−1)/l}\text{(16)}\qquad \exp\Bigl\{(l^2-\varepsilon)\frac{s^{1/l}}{(\log s)^{(l-1)/l}}\Bigr\}

solutions in non-negative integers x,z1,…,zsx,z_1,\ldots,z_s.

Remark (p. 54). The polynomial built has only rational integer roots; the authors state that a comparable lower bound remains open when, for instance, FF is irreducible over the rationals.

Context in the paper. For an irreducible binary form F∈Z[X,Y]F\in\mathbb Z[X,Y] of degree n≥3n\ge3 with non-zero discriminant, the introduction (p. 37) states Evertse's bound exp⁡(n3(4s+7))\exp(n^3(4s+7)) for the number of coprime pairs x,yx,y with F(x,y)F(x,y) composed of primes from SS, and the authors state (p. 38) that it follows from Theorem 5 that this bound cannot be replaced by exp⁡(n2s1/n/log⁡s)\exp(n^2s^{1/n}/\log s), not even when FF is a polynomial in one variable.

Proof pointer

Pp. 53--54. Apply Lemma 3 (p. 40) with c=1c=1, f(x)=(log⁡x)/lf(x)=(\log x)/l and N=⌊exp⁡{(l−δ)(slog⁡s)1/l}⌋N=\lfloor\exp\{(l-\delta)(s\log s)^{1/l}\}\rfloor. It gives a1,…,ama_1,\ldots,a_m and b1,…,blb_1,\ldots,b_l with every ai+bja_i+b_j free of primes above (1−δ/l)lslog⁡s(1-\delta/l)^ls\log s, which is at most psp_s by the prime number theorem; then F(X)=(X+b1)⋯(X+bl)F(X)=(X+b_1)\cdots(X+b_l) and x=aix=a_i give the solutions.

Read depth

Claims checked: the statement and the remark were read clause by clause on the page images of the print. The proof was followed for the outline above and is not independently verified.

Dependencies

  • Lemma 1 (p. 39), through Lemma 3 (p. 40).

Source. P. Erdős, C. L. Stewart and R. Tijdeman, Some diophantine equations with many solutions, Compositio Mathematica 66 (1988), 37--56; the edition read is named on the source card.

Bears on

No problem page of this corpus.