Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Luca 2011 arithmetic function arising carmichael s conjecture

../

lemma_2_1: For x sufficiently large and every squarefree d <= x, the number S(x; d) of n with phi(n) <= x a multiple of d is at most B_{omega(d)} (C_1 log log x)^{omega(d)} x (log log x)^2 / d, with B_k the Bell numbers.

theorem_1_1: For each fixed epsilon > 0 and almost all n, the number F(n) of m with phi(m) = phi(n) lies strictly between K(n)^{1/2 - epsilon} and K(n)^{3/2 + epsilon}, where K(x) = (log x)^{(log log x)(log log log x)}.

theorem_1_2: For x >= 20, the sum over n <= x of the square of Omega(phi(n) + 1) minus omega(phi(n) + 1) is O(x (log log log x)^5 / log log x), so phi(n) + 1 is squarefree for almost all n.

theorem_1_3: For fixed delta in (0, 1), a v <= x with fewer than (log x)^{1 - delta} distinct prime factors up to (log x)^{1 + delta} has at most x/L(x)^{1 + delta + o(1)} preimages under phi, and for any v <= x at most that many preimages m have omega(m) <= log x/(log log x)^{2 + delta}.

theorem_2_1: For squarefree d <= x with d >= exp((log x)^{1/log_3 x}), S(x; d) is at most x/d^{eta + o(1)} when the roundness of d is at most 1 - eta, and at most x/L(d)^{1 + o(1)} uniformly in d.


Luca, Florian and Pollack, Paul, An arithmetic function arising from Carmichael's conjecture. J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 23 (2011), no. 3, 697--714, DOI 10.5802/jtnb.783. The copy read for this card is the journal's PDF from its cedram archive, whose cover page prints "© Société Arithmétique de Bordeaux, 2011, tous droits réservés.", every other right reserved.

Source: https://jtnb.centre-mersenne.org/item/10.5802/jtnb.783/.

Let F(n)F(n) be the number of mm with ϕ(m)=ϕ(n)\phi(m)=\phi(n); Carmichael's conjecture is that F(n)≥2F(n)\ge2 always. The paper studies the normal size of FF. Its main result, Theorem 1.1 (p. 698), is that for each fixed ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and all nn outside a set of density zero, K(n)1/2−ϵ<F(n)<K(n)3/2+ϵK(n)^{1/2-\epsilon}<F(n)<K(n)^{3/2+\epsilon}, where K(x)=(log⁡x)(log⁡log⁡x)(log⁡log⁡log⁡x)K(x)=(\log x)^{(\log\log x)(\log\log\log x)}. The engine is Lemma 2.1 (p. 701), a uniform upper bound for the number S(x;d)S(x;d) of nn with ϕ(n)≤x\phi(n)\le x divisible by a squarefree dd, combined with the Erdős--Pomerance normal order of ω(ϕ(n))\omega(\phi(n)). Theorem 2.1 (p. 702) records what the lemma gives for squarefree d≥exp⁡((log⁡x)1/log⁡3x)d\ge\exp((\log x)^{1/\log_3x}), log⁡3\log_3 the triple logarithm, where ω(d)\omega(d) may be large. As an application, Theorem 1.2 (p. 699) shows that the second moment of Ω(ϕ(n)+1)−ω(ϕ(n)+1)\Omega(\phi(n)+1)-\omega(\phi(n)+1) over n≤xn\le x is ≪x(log⁡log⁡log⁡x)5/log⁡log⁡x\ll x(\log\log\log x)^5/\log\log x for x≥20x\ge20, so ϕ(n)+1\phi(n)+1 is squarefree for almost all nn.

The introduction (p. 698) recalls the results on large values of FF: Erdős's 1935 theorem that F(n)>ncF(n)>n^c infinitely often for some c>0c>0, the value c=0.7038c=0.7038 that the paper attributes to Baker and Harman's work, the conjecture that every c<1c<1 is permissible, and Pomerance's bound (1.1), max⁡n≤xF(n)≤x/L(x)1+o(1)\max_{n\le x}F(n)\le x/L(x)^{1+o(1)} with L(x)=xlog⁡log⁡log⁡x/log⁡log⁡xL(x)=x^{\log\log\log x/\log\log x}, with equality under a hypothesis on smooth shifted primes. None of these is proved in the paper. Theorem 1.3 (p. 700), for fixed 0<δ<10<\delta<1, gives a necessary condition for a value v≤xv\le x to have more than x/L(x)1+δ+o(1)x/L(x)^{1+\delta+o(1)} preimages: at least (log⁡x)1−δ(\log x)^{1-\delta} distinct prime factors up to (log⁡x)1+δ(\log x)^{1+\delta}. It also shows that at most x/L(x)1+δ+o(1)x/L(x)^{1+\delta+o(1)} preimages of any v≤xv\le x have at most log⁡x/(log⁡log⁡x)2+δ\log x/(\log\log x)^{2+\delta} distinct prime factors.

Read status: claims checked for the results linked below, statements read clause by clause on the page images of the print; the proofs of Lemma 2.1, Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 1.3 followed, those of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 read for structure. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Results.

  • Theorem 1.1 (p. 698): for almost all nn, F(n)F(n) lies between K(n)1/2−ϵK(n)^{1/2-\epsilon} and K(n)3/2+ϵK(n)^{3/2+\epsilon}.
  • Theorem 1.2 (p. 699): the second-moment bound (1.2), so ϕ(n)+1\phi(n)+1 is squarefree for almost all nn.
  • Theorem 1.3 (p. 700): for fixed 0<δ<10<\delta<1, a value v≤xv\le x with fewer than (log⁡x)1−δ(\log x)^{1-\delta} distinct prime factors up to (log⁡x)1+δ(\log x)^{1+\delta} has at most x/L(x)1+δ+o(1)x/L(x)^{1+\delta+o(1)} preimages, and any v≤xv\le x has at most that many preimages mm with ω(m)≤log⁡x/(log⁡log⁡x)2+δ\omega(m)\le\log x/(\log\log x)^{2+\delta}.
  • Lemma 2.1 (p. 701): the uniform bound for S(x;d)S(x;d).
  • Theorem 2.1 (p. 702): bounds for S(x;d)S(x;d) when d≤xd\le x is squarefree and d≥exp⁡((log⁡x)1/log⁡3x)d\ge\exp((\log x)^{1/\log_3x}).

Bears on. #821: the paper proves no lower bound for the number of preimages of a value. Its introduction (p. 698) cites Erdős's theorem that F(n)>ncF(n)>n^c infinitely often for some c>0c>0 and the value c=0.7038c=0.7038 that it attributes to Baker and Harman's work, and records the conjecture that any c<1c<1 is permissible, phrased for F(n)=#ϕ−1(ϕ(n))F(n)=\#\phi^{-1}(\phi(n)) rather than for the number of preimages of nn. Theorem 1.3 (p. 700) gives a necessary condition on a value v≤xv\le x with more than x/L(x)1+δ+o(1)x/L(x)^{1+\delta+o(1)} preimages. It decides nothing about the problem.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.