Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Pollack 2016 problems erdos sum divisors function

../

conjecture_1_4: The paper conjectures, from a heuristic random model of s(n) = sigma(n) - n, that the numbers outside the range of s have asymptotic density Delta, the limit of (1/log y) times the sum of (1/a)e^{-a/s(a)} over even a up to y; it is not proved.

theorem_1_1: States that the count of up-down reversals and the count of down-up reversals in [1,x] are each at most x/exp((sqrt(3)+o(1))(log_3 x log_4 x)^{1/2}) as x tends to infinity, with log_k the k-fold iterated logarithm.

theorem_1_2: States that the number of up-down reversals in [1,x], the n that are nondeficient with s(n) deficient, is bounded below by a constant times x/((log_2 x)(log_3 x)^3).

theorem_1_3: States that the number of down-up reversals in [1,x], the n that are deficient with s(n) nondeficient, is bounded below by a constant times x/((log_2 x)(log_3 x)^2).

theorem_1_5: States that the number of primitive friendly pairs contained in [1,x], unordered pairs of distinct integers with equal sigma(n)/n and no nontrivial common unitary divisor, is at most x^{1/2+o(1)} as x tends to infinity.

theorem_1_6: States that for each fixed nonnegative integer k the number N_k(x) of n at most x having at least k friends m at most x is (alpha_k+o(1))x for a constant alpha_k, and that alpha_k tends to 0 as k tends to infinity.

theorem_5_2: States that the limiting proportions alpha_k of Theorem 1.6 decrease strictly while positive: if alpha_k > 0, then alpha_k > alpha_{k+1}.

theorem_p24: States that the number g(x) of coprime pairs a < b <= x with sigma(a) = sigma(b) exceeds x^{1.4} for all sufficiently large x, so g(x)/x tends to infinity.


Paul Pollack, Carl Pomerance, Some problems of Erdős on the sum-of-divisors function. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Series B 3 (2016), 1-26. doi:10.1090/btran/10. The file prints "©2016 by the authors under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License (CC BY NC 3.0)": the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 license; its offprint footer also reads "This is a free offprint provided to the author by the publisher. Copyright restrictions may apply."

The paper takes up three of Erdős's themes on σ(n)\sigma(n) and s(n)=σ(n)−ns(n)=\sigma(n)-n, and closes with a fourth. First, aliquot reversals: an up-down reversal is a nondeficient nn with s(n)s(n) deficient, a down-up reversal a deficient nn with s(n)s(n) nondeficient (p. 2). Theorem 1.1 lowers the upper bound for both counts in [1,x][1,x] to x/exp⁡((3+o(1))(log⁡3x log⁡4x)1/2)x/\exp((\sqrt3+o(1))(\log_3x\,\log_4x)^{1/2}), while Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 give the first lower bounds, ≫x/((log⁡2x)(log⁡3x)3)\gg x/((\log_2x)(\log_3x)^3) and ≫x/((log⁡2x)(log⁡3x)2)\gg x/((\log_2x)(\log_3x)^2), established for even numbers (p. 3). Second, Conjecture 1.4 predicts, from a heuristic random model of ss, the asymptotic density Δ\Delta of the nonaliquot numbers (those outside the range of ss); the counts to 101010^{10} in Table 1 are consistent with a density of about 0.170.17 (p. 3), and Section 3.3 (p. 17) treats the analogue for n−φ(n)n-\varphi(n). Third, on friendly numbers (equal σ(n)/n\sigma(n)/n), Theorem 1.5 bounds the primitive friendly pairs in [1,x][1,x] by x1/2+o(1)x^{1/2+o(1)}, strengthening the convergence of ∑1/m\sum1/m used by Erdős, and Theorem 1.6 shows that the number Nk(x)N_k(x) of n≤xn\le x with at least kk friends in [1,x][1,x] is (αk+o(1))x(\alpha_k+o(1))x with αk→0\alpha_k\to0; Theorem 5.2 shows αk>αk+1\alpha_k>\alpha_{k+1} whenever αk>0\alpha_k>0. Finally, Section 6 (pp. 23--24) proves that the number of coprime pairs a<b≤xa<b\le x with σ(a)=σ(b)\sigma(a)=\sigma(b) exceeds x1.4x^{1.4} for large xx. The reversal upper bounds rest on sieve methods, counts of primitive nondeficient numbers and bounds for solutions of σ(n)≡a(modn)\sigma(n)\equiv a\pmod n; the lower bounds on explicit sieve constructions.

No result of the paper bears directly on Problem 410, which iterates σ\sigma rather than ss; the paper is context for it. It records that nn and s(n)s(n) differ in parity exactly when nn is a square or twice a square (Section 1, p. 2), and its reversal counts measure how often iteration of ss turns between nondeficient and deficient.

Source: https://math.dartmouth.edu/~carlp/btran10.pdf.

Results

Page numbers are those of the journal print (pp. 1--26).

  • Theorem 1.1 (p. 2): both reversal counts in [1,x][1,x] are at most x/exp⁡((3+o(1))(log⁡3x log⁡4x)1/2)x/\exp((\sqrt3+o(1))(\log_3x\,\log_4x)^{1/2}).
  • Theorem 1.2 (p. 2): up-down reversals in [1,x][1,x] number ≫x/((log⁡2x)(log⁡3x)3)\gg x/((\log_2x)(\log_3x)^3).
  • Theorem 1.3 (p. 2): down-up reversals in [1,x][1,x] number ≫x/((log⁡2x)(log⁡3x)2)\gg x/((\log_2x)(\log_3x)^2).
  • Conjecture 1.4 (p. 3): the nonaliquot numbers have density Δ=lim⁡y→∞(log⁡y)−1∑a≤y, 2∣aa−1e−a/s(a)\Delta=\lim_{y\to\infty}(\log y)^{-1}\sum_{a\le y,\,2\mid a}a^{-1}e^{-a/s(a)}; a heuristic, with the φ\varphi analogue of Section 3.3 (p. 17).
  • Theorem 1.5 (p. 4): at most x1/2+o(1)x^{1/2+o(1)} primitive friendly pairs lie in [1,x][1,x].
  • Theorem 1.6 (p. 5): for each fixed k≥0k\ge0, Nk(x)=(αk+o(1))xN_k(x)=(\alpha_k+o(1))x, and αk→0\alpha_k\to0.
  • Theorem 5.2 (p. 22): if αk>0\alpha_k>0 then αk>αk+1\alpha_k>\alpha_{k+1}.
  • Section 6 result (pp. 23--24): coprime pairs a<b≤xa<b\le x with σ(a)=σ(b)\sigma(a)=\sigma(b) number more than x1.4x^{1.4} for large xx.

Read status. Claims checked for the eight results above, read clause by clause on the print; the proofs were read for their structure only, and the computations behind Tables 1--4 were not rerun.

Bears on

  • Problem 824: the Section 6 result gives h(x)>(x−1)1.4h(x)>(x-1)^{1.4} for large xx, hence h(x)/x→∞h(x)/x\to\infty; the problem asks whether h(x)>x2−o(1)h(x)>x^{2-o(1)}, which the paper does not decide.
  • Problem 418: context only. Section 3.3 (p. 17) gives a conjectural density and computed counts for the integers not of the form n−φ(n)n-\varphi(n); they prove nothing about the problem.
  • Problem 830: context only. The lesser member of an amicable pair is an up-down reversal (p. 2), so Theorem 1.1 bounds above the number of lesser members of amicable pairs in [1,x][1,x]; the problem asks for infinitely many pairs and a lower bound, which an upper bound does not decide.
  • Problem 410: context only, as explained above.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.