Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Daniel W. Cranston and Landon Rabern, The fractional chromatic number of the plane, arXiv:1501.01647 (2015); later Combinatorica 37 (2017), 837–861, doi:10.1007/s00493-016-3380-3. Lemma 1 on p. 8 of arXiv v1 (7 January 2015), the edition named on the source card; the journal's labels and pagination may differ.
Notation (p. 6). Fix a vertex of the unit triangular lattice. is the graph made of the lattice vertices within distance of (the core) together with every Moser spindle attached to the core in the three directions of Section 2; is the subgraph of induced by the core vertices. The eight tiles are drawn in Figure 5 (p. 9), up to reflection and rotation.
Statement
Lemma 1 (p. 8). The paper states:
Let denote a maximal independent subset in . There exists a set of 8 finite tiles (shown in Figure 5), independent of and , such that can be tiled with tiles from where each corner of each tile is a vertex of and no vertex of lies in the interior of any tile. In this tiling, each face of is covered by exactly one or two tiles. (We do allow tiles to extend past the boundary of , though this allowance could be removed by adding more tiles to .)
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the definitions it uses were read clause by clause on the arXiv v1 PDF. The case analysis of the proof was read for structure; nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
The proof runs over pp. 8–11, in Section 3.2 (pp. 8–12). Join two vertices of by a segment exactly when their Euclidean distance is less than , and delete every pair of segments that cross; the faces of the resulting plane graph are the tiles. A face containing a lattice edge at one of its corners in its interior is identified as one of , – by a case analysis on which vertices near that corner lie in (Figure 6, p. 10), using only that is independent and maximal. A face containing no lattice edge in its interior has every boundary segment of length and corner angles , so it is . Figure 7 (p. 11) shows an example tiling.
Uses within this source
The discharging proof of Theorem 2 averages the final weight of the core vertices tile by tile over this tiling (pp. 12–18).
Bears on
- Problem 508: only through Theorem 2, a lower bound on the fractional chromatic number of the plane; the lemma itself is a statement about the triangular lattice and says nothing about the chromatic number.