Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Daniel W. Cranston and Landon Rabern, The fractional chromatic number of the plane, arXiv:1501.01647 (2015); later Combinatorica 37 (2017), 837–861, doi:10.1007/s00493-016-3380-3. Theorem 2 on p. 12 of arXiv v1 (7 January 2015), the edition named on the source card; the journal's labels and pagination may differ.

Notation (pp. 1–2). χf(R2)\chi_f(\mathbb R^2) is the fractional chromatic number of the graph whose vertices are the points of the plane, two points adjacent when their distance is 11: the least total weight of a nonnegative weighting of its independent sets under which every vertex lies in sets of total weight at least 11.

Statement

Theorem 2 (p. 12). The paper states:

The fractional chromatic number of the plane is at least 7621\frac{76}{21}, i.e., χf(R2)≥7621\chi_f(\mathbb{R}^2) \ge \frac{76}{21}.

Here 76/21≈3.61904776/21\approx3.619047. The previous best lower bound, recalled on p. 3, was 32/9≈3.555632/9\approx3.5556.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the construction of the graphs Gd′G'_d and the weights were read clause by clause on the arXiv v1 PDF. The discharging proof (Claims 1–6) was read for structure; nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Section 3.3 (pp. 12–18), on the graphs Gd′G'_d built at the end of Section 3.2 (pp. 11–12). The lower bound comes from a sequence of finite unit-distance graphs Gd′G'_d and the fact that the total vertex weight divided by the largest weight of an independent set bounds χf\chi_f below (p. 3).

  • The graphs (pp. 3, 6, 11–12). The core CdC_d is the part of the triangular lattice within distance dd of a fixed lattice vertex. Moser spindles are attached to the core along every diamond (two lattice vertices at distance 3\sqrt3 and their two common neighbours), now in six directions at each core vertex, so that each interior core vertex meets 1212 spindles; the second spindle on each pair is the reflection of the first across the perpendicular bisector, and the rotation angle is cos⁡−1(5/6)\cos^{-1}(5/6). Spindle vertices that happen to coincide are merged and their weights added, which keeps the argument valid (p. 12).
  • The weights (p. 12). Each core vertex gets 31/531/5 and each spindle vertex 1/21/2. With MM core vertices there are M(18−o(1))M(18-o(1)) spindle vertices as d→∞d\to\infty, so the total weight is M(31/5+9−o(1))M(31/5+9-o(1)).
  • The bound (pp. 12–13). For an arbitrary independent set II, the weight in II is moved onto the core so that core vertices end with average weight at most 21/521/5 and spindles with weight at most 00. The averaging is done tile by tile over the tiling of Lemma 1, in three discharging phases (rules R1–R6, p. 13), and Claims 1–6 (pp. 14–18) show that every tile ends with excess at most 00 and every spindle with nonnegative weight. The ratio (31/5+9−o(1))/(21/5)(31/5+9-o(1))/(21/5) tends to 76/2176/21.

Remarks in the source

  • p. 18: changing two discharging rules (the 1/31/3 in R1 to 13/4213/42, the 3/103/10 in R4 to 2/72/7) improves the bound to 105/29≈3.6207105/29\approx3.6207; the authors state that the proof needs four further phases and an additional 5-spindle block, and do not present it. They ask for the value of lim⁡d→∞χf(Gd′)\lim_{d\to\infty}\chi_f(G'_d), and whether it exceeds 105/29105/29.
  • p. 5: a linear program on a larger version of the Fisher–Ullman graph gave χf≥1732/481≈3.6008\chi_f\ge 1732/481\approx3.6008; the authors say they offer no proof of that bound beyond their code generating the LP.
  • p. 19: since every Gd′G'_d has its vertices in Q(3,11)×Q(3,11)\mathbb Q(\sqrt3,\sqrt{11})\times\mathbb Q(\sqrt3,\sqrt{11}), the same argument gives χf(Q(3,11)×Q(3,11))≥76/21\chi_f\bigl(\mathbb Q(\sqrt3,\sqrt{11})\times\mathbb Q(\sqrt3,\sqrt{11})\bigr)\ge 76/21.

Bears on

  • Problem 508: the problem asks for the chromatic number χ(R2)\chi(\mathbb R^2). Since χ(R2)≥χf(R2)\chi(\mathbb R^2)\ge\chi_f(\mathbb R^2), the theorem gives χ(R2)≥76/21\chi(\mathbb R^2)\ge 76/21, hence only χ(R2)≥4\chi(\mathbb R^2)\ge4 for the integer χ\chi, which the Moser spindle already gives. The theorem is a bound on the fractional relaxation, not on the problem's quantity; the later fractional bound 44 is on the Matolcsi–Ruzsa–Varga–Zsámboki card.