Source. Theorem 8 and Figure 2, printed pp. 345–346, physical pp. 5–6 of
the published paper.
For every set T of three distinct points,
R(T,3,2) is true.(1)
Exact six-triangle gadget
Let the three mutual distances in T be a,b,c, with a>0. Identify a
plane with C and put
ω=eiπ/3,B=0,C=a,A=aω.(2)
The triangle inequalities give a point z∈C such that
∣z∣=b,∣z−A∣=c.(3)
Indeed, these are two circles whose center distance is a, and they
intersect exactly when ∣b−c∣≤a≤b+c. Define
E=z,D=ωz,F=z+a,G=z+aω,H=a+ωz.(4)
Using
1−ω=ω,ω−1=−ω,ω2=−ω,(5)
one obtains the following exact side-length table:
triangleABEDBCGFCEFHACHDEGside of length aABBCGFEFACEGside of length bBEBDFCFHCHDEside of length cEADCCGHEHADG.(6)
More explicitly, with δ=z−aω, the six rows are verified by
ABE:DBC:GFC:EFH:ACH:DEG:∣AB∣=a,∣BE∣=∣z∣=b,∣EA∣=∣δ∣=c,∣BC∣=a,∣BD∣=∣ωz∣=b,∣DC∣=∣ωδ∣=c,∣GF∣=∣a(1−ω)∣=a,∣FC∣=∣z∣=b,∣CG∣=∣δ∣=c,∣EF∣=a,∣FH∣=∣(ω−1)z∣=b,∣HE∣=∣a−ωz∣=c,∣AC∣=a,∣CH∣=∣ωz∣=b,∣HA∣=∣ω(H−A)∣=∣δ∣=c,∣EG∣=a,∣DE∣=∣(1−ω)z∣=b,∣DG∣=∣ω(G−D)∣=∣δ∣=c.(7)
Here, for example, D−C=ωδ,
ω(H−A)=δ, and
ω(G−D)=δ; the remaining displayed identities follow
directly from (2)–(5). Thus all six listed triangles are congruent to T.
Color forcing
Two-color R3. By
Theorem 6,
there is a monochromatic equilateral triangle of side a. Place it as
A,B,C in (2), and call its color red. Suppose no congruent copy of T is
monochromatic.
The copies ABE,DBC,ACH force E,D,H blue. Then DEG forces G red.
The copy GFC forces F blue, whereas EFH forces F red, a
contradiction. This proves (1).
If T is collinear, one triangle inequality in (3) is an equality and the
two circles are tangent. The construction still exists. Since T consists
of three distinct points, a,b,c are positive, so every triangle in (6) has
three distinct vertices. Coincidences between vertices belonging to different
triangles only force an earlier color contradiction and do not affect the
argument. Thus no nondegeneracy assumption was used.
Used by.
Theorem 9 and
Theorem 11.