Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Theorem 9, printed p. 346, physical p. 6 of the published paper. The displayed statement is planar: its ambient space is .
Let . Let be triangles such that has a side of length , has a side of length , and has a side of length . Every two-coloring of contains a monochromatic triangle congruent to at least one of .
Equilateral forcing
Put
By the positive part of Theorem 5, there are same-colored points at distance . Apply an isometry and call red, exchanging the color names if necessary. Suppose there is no monochromatic equilateral triangle with side length , , or .
The points and complete the two unit-scale equilateral triangles on , so both are blue. The three points
form an equilateral triangle of side ; hence is red. The triangle has side , so is blue.
Now form an equilateral triangle of side , so cannot be red. But is another such triangle, so cannot be blue. This contradiction proves that a monochromatic equilateral triangle exists at one of the three scales.
Passing to the prescribed triangles
The coordinate construction in Theorem 8 has the following planar consequence: from a monochromatic equilateral triangle whose side equals one side of a prescribed triangle , its six congruent planar copies force a monochromatic copy of . Apply that gadget to , , or according to which scale was forced above. This proves the theorem.
Used by. Corollary 10.
Bears on. #173: the proof's first step shows that no two-coloring of the plane misses the equilateral triangles of all three sides , and . The problem's page, through Theorem 1 of the 1975 sequel, reduces the question to whether a coloring can miss equilateral triangles of two different sides; this theorem excludes only missing all three sides in these ratios at once. It forces a single prescribed triangle only when one triangle has all three sides, the case of Corollary 10.