Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Theorem 1, p. 3, of József Solymosi and Miloš Stojaković, Many collinear k-tuples with no k+1 collinear points, Discrete & Computational Geometry 50 (2013), no. 3, 811--820, doi:10.1007/s00454-013-9526-9, read in the author preprint arXiv:1107.0327v3 (24 September 2013) named on the source card; pages here are the preprint's, and the journal pagination was not compared.
Statement
Setting (p. 2). For a finite set of points in the plane and , is the number of lines meeting in exactly points, and is the number of lines meeting in at least points. For and ,
the largest number of lines with exactly points of an -point planar set with no collinear points. The paper abbreviates , and writes for the base-2 logarithm (p. 3).
Theorem 1 (p. 3). "For any integer, there is a positive integer such that for we have , where ."
That is, for each integer there is such that for every some set of points in the plane with no on a line has more than lines each containing exactly of its points, where .
Arithmetic progressions (p. 3). The paper notes that in its construction each counted -point line meets the set in a -term arithmetic progression: consecutive points are equally spaced in every coordinate.
Context on pp. 2--3. The paper states Erdős's conjecture that for every fixed , for which he offered a prize for a proof or disproof, and records it as Conjecture 12 of the Brass--Moser--Pach problem collection. Its stated aim is to show that this conjecture, if true, is sharp: for the exponent 2 cannot be replaced by for any . It lists the earlier lower bounds for all (Kárteszi) and (Grünbaum, 1976), the latter improved for by Ismailescu, Brass and Elkies with exponents still tending to 1 as grows.
Read depth. Claims checked: the definitions, Theorem 1 and the arithmetic-progression remark were read clause by clause on the preprint's page images, and the proof on pp. 4--11 was followed in outline, not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof sketch
Pp. 4--11, separately for even and odd . Two lemmas supply the counting. Lemma 3 (p. 4) bounds the number of integer points in the closed ball of radius in between the volumes of the balls of radii . Lemma 4 (p. 5) bounds the integer points on a sphere, for a constant , from the divisor bound for sums of two squares.
Even (pp. 5--8). With , pigeonholing on the squared radius gives a sphere , , holding at least a fraction of the integer points of , and pigeonholing again on squared distances gives many pairs of its integer points at one common distance . Each such pair extends along its line to equally spaced integer points , the -th pair from the middle lying on the sphere of radius . The set of all integer points on the spheres has no collinear points, since a line meets each sphere at most twice, and each such pair gives a line with exactly points of . Comparing the count of these lines with , bounded by Lemmas 3 and 4, gives for large, here with (p. 8).
Odd (pp. 8--11). The pairs are taken on with different first coordinates at a common distance , so that each midpoint is an integer point, and a pigeonhole over the hyperplanes of fixed first coordinate picks one hyperplane containing many midpoints. consists of the integer points on of the spheres, those on the outermost sphere off , and those on the midpoints' sphere inside . A line not in meets in at most points, the part of in lies on spheres, and each chosen pair gives a line with exactly points; the same comparison gives (p. 11).
In both cases the set built in is projected to a plane along a generic vector, chosen so that distinct points stay distinct and non-collinear triples stay non-collinear, which keeps the count of lines with exactly points and creates no line with (pp. 8, 11). The proof builds, for each large , one set whose size is fixed by .
Dependencies
Lemmas 3 and 4 of the paper (pp. 4--5); the volume formula for the ball and standard estimates for the Gamma function (p. 7); the bound for the divisor function and the fact that the number of representations of as a sum of two squares is at most , both cited from Apostol's Introduction to analytic number theory, Section 13.10 (p. 5).
Bears on
- Problem 101: the case gives, for every , sets of points in the plane with no five on a line and more than lines containing exactly four of the points, with . This is a lower bound for the count the problem asks to be ; since it does not contradict , and the paper leaves the conjecture open.
- Problem 588: with no points on a line, a line with at least points has exactly , so for each Theorem 1 gives for , with . This lower bound is compatible with and does not decide the question.