Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Solymosi 2013 many collinear k tuples

../

theorem_1: For every integer k >= 4 and all n beyond some n_0, gives n-point planar sets with no k+1 collinear points and more than n^(2 - c/sqrt(log n)) lines through exactly k of them, with c = 2 log(4k+9) and log to base 2.


Solymosi, József and Stojaković, Miloš, Many collinear k-tuples with no k+1 collinear points. Discrete Comput. Geom. 50(3) (2013), 811-820, doi:10.1007/s00454-013-9526-9. The copy read for this card is the author preprint arXiv:1107.0327v3 (24 September 2013), cited here by its pages; the journal pagination was not compared. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1107.0327), every other right reserved.

For a finite planar set PP, tk(P)t_k(P) counts the lines meeting PP in exactly kk points, and tk(n)=tk(k+1)(n)t_k(n)=t_k^{(k+1)}(n) is its maximum over nn-point sets with no k+1k+1 collinear points (p. 2). Theorem 1 (p. 3): for every integer k≥4k\ge4 there is n0n_0 such that tk(n)>n2−c/log⁡nt_k(n)>n^{2-c/\sqrt{\log n}} for all n>n0n>n_0, where c=2log⁡(4k+9)c=2\log(4k+9) and log⁡\log is to base 2. The paper states Erdős's conjecture that tk(r)(n)=o(n2)t_k^{(r)}(n)=o(n^2) for every fixed r>k>3r>k>3 (a prize problem, p. 2), and its stated aim is to show that this conjecture, if true, is sharp: the exponent 2 cannot be replaced by 2−c2-c for any c>0c>0 (p. 3). The bound improves the earlier lower bounds of Kárteszi (cknlog⁡nc_kn\log n), Grünbaum (ckn1+1/(k−2)c_kn^{1+1/(k-2)}) and later improvements for k≥5k\ge5 by Ismailescu, Brass and Elkies, listed on p. 3.

The construction takes the integer points on k/2k/2 concentric spheres in Rd\mathbb R^d (for odd kk, the integer points on (k−3)/2(k-3)/2 spheres and on a further sphere minus a hyperplane, together with those of one more sphere that lie in that hyperplane), counts the lines through exactly kk of them with the lattice-point estimates of Lemmas 3 and 4 (pp. 4--5), and projects the set to a plane along a generic vector, which keeps those lines and creates no line with k+1k+1 points. The even case gives the constant 2log⁡(3k+6)2\log(3k+6) (p. 8) and the odd case 2log⁡(4k+9)2\log(4k+9) (p. 11). Each counted kk-tuple is a kk-term arithmetic progression (p. 3).

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.0327.

Results. Labels and pages are the preprint's. The statement was read clause by clause against the print (claims checked); the proof was followed in outline, not checked step by step.

  • Theorem 1 (p. 3; proof pp. 4--11): tk(n)>n2−c/log⁡nt_k(n)>n^{2-c/\sqrt{\log n}} for n>n0n>n_0, with c=2log⁡(4k+9)c=2\log(4k+9), for every integer k≥4k\ge4; the counted kk-tuples are arithmetic progressions (p. 3).

Bears on.

  • #101: the case k=4k=4 of Theorem 1 gives, for n>n0n>n_0, nn-point planar sets with no five on a line and more than n2−c/log⁡nn^{2-c/\sqrt{\log n}} lines with exactly four points, c=2log⁡225c=2\log_2 25. This is a lower bound compatible with the conjectured o(n2)o(n^2) and does not decide the problem.
  • #588: with no k+1k+1 points on a line, lines with at least kk points have exactly kk, so Theorem 1 gives fk(n)>n2−c/log⁡nf_k(n)>n^{2-c/\sqrt{\log n}} for every k≥4k\ge4 and n>n0n>n_0, with c=2log⁡2(4k+9)c=2\log_2(4k+9). This lower bound is compatible with fk(n)=o(n2)f_k(n)=o(n^2) and does not decide the question.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.