Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Solymosi 2013 many collinear k tuples
theorem_1: For every integer k >= 4 and all n beyond some n_0, gives n-point planar sets with no k+1 collinear points and more than n^(2 - c/sqrt(log n)) lines through exactly k of them, with c = 2 log(4k+9) and log to base 2.
Solymosi, József and Stojaković, Miloš, Many collinear k-tuples with no k+1 collinear points. Discrete Comput. Geom. 50(3) (2013), 811-820, doi:10.1007/s00454-013-9526-9. The copy read for this card is the author preprint arXiv:1107.0327v3 (24 September 2013), cited here by its pages; the journal pagination was not compared. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1107.0327), every other right reserved.
For a finite planar set , counts the lines meeting in exactly points, and is its maximum over -point sets with no collinear points (p. 2). Theorem 1 (p. 3): for every integer there is such that for all , where and is to base 2. The paper states Erdős's conjecture that for every fixed (a prize problem, p. 2), and its stated aim is to show that this conjecture, if true, is sharp: the exponent 2 cannot be replaced by for any (p. 3). The bound improves the earlier lower bounds of Kárteszi (), Grünbaum () and later improvements for by Ismailescu, Brass and Elkies, listed on p. 3.
The construction takes the integer points on concentric spheres in (for odd , the integer points on spheres and on a further sphere minus a hyperplane, together with those of one more sphere that lie in that hyperplane), counts the lines through exactly of them with the lattice-point estimates of Lemmas 3 and 4 (pp. 4--5), and projects the set to a plane along a generic vector, which keeps those lines and creates no line with points. The even case gives the constant (p. 8) and the odd case (p. 11). Each counted -tuple is a -term arithmetic progression (p. 3).
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.0327.
Results. Labels and pages are the preprint's. The statement was read clause by clause against the print (claims checked); the proof was followed in outline, not checked step by step.
- Theorem 1 (p. 3; proof pp. 4--11): for , with , for every integer ; the counted -tuples are arithmetic progressions (p. 3).
Bears on.
- #101: the case of Theorem 1 gives, for , -point planar sets with no five on a line and more than lines with exactly four points, . This is a lower bound compatible with the conjectured and does not decide the problem.
- #588: with no points on a line, lines with at least points have exactly , so Theorem 1 gives for every and , with . This lower bound is compatible with and does not decide the question.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.