Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Zhao–Ge: Monochromatic unit equilateral triangle on low-dimensional spheres

../

theorem_1_2: Zhao and Ge's asymmetric theorem: for every r > 0 and a > 0 with a/r <= sqrt 3, every red-blue coloring of the 2-sphere of radius r has two red points at distance a or a blue equilateral triangle of side a; for r = 1/sqrt 2 and a = 1 this is Corollary 1.3.

theorem_1_4: Zhao and Ge's threshold theorem: some red-blue coloring of the 2-sphere of radius 1/sqrt 2 has no monochromatic unit equilateral triangle, while every red-blue coloring of the 3-sphere of that radius has one.

theorem_1_5: Zhao and Ge's asymmetric theorem: every red-blue coloring of the 2-sphere of radius 1/sqrt 2 has a red triangle with sides sqrt 2, 1, 1 or a blue equilateral triangle of side 1.

theorem_1_6: Zhao and Ge's theorem that for every 0 < a < sqrt 2, every red-blue coloring of the 3-sphere of radius 1/sqrt 2 contains a monochromatic isosceles triangle with side lengths a, 1, 1.

theorem_4_1: Zhao and Ge's auxiliary theorem: for every 0 < a < sqrt 2, every red-blue coloring of the 2-sphere of radius 1/sqrt 2 has two red points at distance a or a blue isosceles triangle with side lengths a, 1, 1.


The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2605.16958), every other right reserved. The copy read for this card is arXiv:2605.16958v1 (16 May 2026); its section, equation and result numbers are cited below.

Xiaochen Zhao, Gennian Ge, "Monochromatic unit equilateral triangle on low-dimensional spheres," arXiv:2605.16958 (2026).

Overview

The paper studies unrestricted red–blue colorings of fixed-radius spheres, with congruence measured in the ambient Euclidean space. In §1.2 the authors write S→(A;B)\mathbb S\to(A;B) when every such coloring contains a red copy of AA or a blue copy of BB, and define N(A,r)N(A,r) as the least sphere dimension nn for which Sn(r)→(A;A)\mathbb S^n(r)\to(A;A). Here RaR_a is the equilateral triangle of side aa, TaT_a a pair at distance aa, IaI_a the triangle with side lengths a,1,1a,1,1, and R=R1R=R_1.

The principal result is the exact fixed-radius threshold

N(R,1/2)=3.N(R,1/\sqrt2)=3.

More explicitly, Theorem 1.4(1) constructs a red–blue coloring of S2(1/2)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2) in which every unit equilateral triangle gets both colors, while Theorem 1.4(2) proves that every red–blue coloring of S3(1/2)\mathbb S^3(1/\sqrt2) contains a monochromatic one. This is a statement about all colorings, with no regularity hypothesis.

The main auxiliary result is the asymmetric Theorem 1.2:

S2(r)→(Ta;Ra)(a/r≤3).\mathbb S^2(r)\to(T_a;R_a)\qquad(a/r\le \sqrt3).

The bound is geometrically sharp because RaR_a embeds in S2(r)\mathbb S^2(r) exactly in this range. Corollary 1.3 specializes it to S2(1/2)→(T1;R)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2)\to(T_1;R). Its proof in §2 assumes simultaneously that no red pair has distance aa and no blue RaR_a exists. The folded equilateral-diamond construction produces a second propagation distance bb, computed together with the radius of its distance circle in equation (2). Lemma 2.1 then shows that, when a/r<3a/r<\sqrt3 and a/r≠2a/r\ne\sqrt2, a red point has a blue aa-distance circle and a red bb-distance circle.

The proof of Theorem 1.2 separates three geometric regimes. For a/r=2a/r=\sqrt2, distance aa becomes orthogonality after scaling, as in equations (3)–(4). Claims 2.2 and 2.4 convert colors of points into color or transitivity conditions on great circles. The parametrization (5) produces a closed red curve Γ\Gamma; Lemmas 2.5–2.6 and Claim 2.7 turn it into a red latitude and a blue spherical strip. Proposition 2.8, via the general strip and enlargement statements in Claims 2.9–2.10, iterates this construction twice to obtain a red circle of diameter greater than 11, contradicting the absence of a red unit pair. For a/r=3a/r=\sqrt3, Claims 2.11–2.12 give analogous rules on small circles; the circle-intersection system is equation (6), with its algebra expanded in Appendix A, equations (13)–(19). Claim 2.13 applies the intermediate value theorem to force an intersection between a red curve and a blue distance circle. In the remaining range, the angular propagation increment γ\gamma is given by equation (7); Claims 2.14–2.15 show that repeated propagation creates red arcs of angular length mγm\gamma, eventually long enough to contain a red pair at distance aa.

The upper half of the threshold theorem is proved in §3.1 by restricting a coloring of S3(1/2)⊂R4\mathbb S^3(1/\sqrt2)\subset\mathbb R^4 to an equatorial S2(1/2)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2) and splitting according to whether some antipodal pair has different colors. The first case uses the externally cited Cherkashin–Voronov result, stated as Lemma 1.7, that S2(r)→(Ta;Ta)\mathbb S^2(r)\to(T_a;T_a) for a<2ra<2r; the second uses Corollary 1.3. An equatorial monochromatic unit pair, together with a suitably colored pole, forms the required equilateral triangle.

For the lower half, §3.2 observes that unit equilateral triangles on S2(1/2)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2) are precisely orthogonal triples, equation (8). The explicit coloring (9) is determined by the sign of yzyz, with carefully assigned colors on the coordinate great circles. Orthogonal-basis expansion gives equation (10), ∑iyizi=0\sum_i y_i z_i=0; Claim 3.1 uses this identity to show that an all-blue orthogonal triple would lie in one coordinate plane and an all-red triple in the other, both impossible.

The paper also proves two isosceles extensions. Theorem 1.5 gives the asymmetric relation

S2(1/2)→(I2;R).\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2)\to(I_{\sqrt2};R).

Its proof in §3.3 again separates differently colored antipodes from monochromatic antipodal pairs: in the first case Claim 3.2 gives two blue equatorial points at unit distance, which form a blue unit equilateral triangle with the blue pole, and in the second Claim 3.3 excludes a red unit pair, so that Corollary 1.3 gives a blue unit equilateral triangle. Theorem 1.6 states that, for every 0<a<20<a<\sqrt2,

S3(1/2)→(Ia;Ia).\mathbb S^3(1/\sqrt2)\to(I_a;I_a).

The key two-dimensional input is Theorem 4.1, S2(1/2)→(Ta;Ia)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2)\to(T_a;I_a). For a≤3/2a\le\sqrt{3/2}, its proof uses an asymmetric folded diamond, the propagation distance in equation (12), Lemma 4.2, and the arc-growth Claims 4.3–4.4. For 3/2<a<2\sqrt{3/2}<a<\sqrt2, Lemmas 4.5–4.8 construct red points on a great circle, a separating family of blue distance circles, and finally a red path that must cross one of those circles; Claims 4.9–4.10 supply the required tangency and continuity. Section 4.2 then lifts Theorem 4.1 from an equatorial 22-sphere to the 33-sphere by the same antipodal-pole argument used for Theorem 1.4(2).

The broader results mentioned in §1.1 are background rather than new conclusions: Theorem 1.1 is the cited Matoušek–Rödl theorem that, for a simplex XX with circumradius ρ(X)\rho(X), every integer r≥2r\ge2 and every δ>0\delta>0, there is a dimension NN such that every rr-coloring of SN−1(ρ(X)+δ)\mathbb S^{N-1}(\rho(X)+\delta) contains a monochromatic congruent copy of XX, and the facts that every Ramsey set is spherical and every simplex is Ramsey are attributed to earlier work. The new scope is specifically sharp or explicit two-color behavior for selected triangles on the low-dimensional sphere of radius 1/21/\sqrt2, together with the general asymmetric spherical theorem for equilateral triangles.

Read status: claims checked for Theorems 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 and 4.1 and Corollary 1.3, read clause by clause on the print; the proofs of Theorems 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 were followed, and the structure of the proofs of Theorems 1.2 and 4.1 was followed without rechecking their computations. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #174: the problem asks for a characterization of the Ramsey sets. The paper does not mention the problem; it recalls (p. 1) the definition of a Ramsey set and, as earlier results, that every Ramsey set is spherical, that the unit equilateral triangle is not 2-Ramsey in the plane, and that every simplex is Ramsey (Frankl and Rödl). Its own theorems, Theorem 1.4 and Theorem 1.6 among them, concern two-colorings of the spheres S2(1/2)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2) and S3(1/2)\mathbb S^3(1/\sqrt2) and prove nothing about which sets are Ramsey.

Results.

  • Theorem 1.2 (p. 2), with Corollary 1.3 (p. 2): S2(r)→(Ta;Ra)\mathbb S^2(r)\to(T_a;R_a) for a/r≤3a/r\le\sqrt3, and S2(1/2)→(T1;R)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2)\to(T_1;R).
  • Theorem 1.4 (pp. 2--3): S2(1/2)↛(R;R)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2)\nrightarrow(R;R) and S3(1/2)→(R;R)\mathbb S^3(1/\sqrt2)\to(R;R), so N(R,1/2)=3N(R,1/\sqrt2)=3.
  • Theorem 1.5 (p. 3): S2(1/2)→(I2;R)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2)\to(I_{\sqrt2};R).
  • Theorem 1.6 (p. 3): S3(1/2)→(Ia;Ia)\mathbb S^3(1/\sqrt2)\to(I_a;I_a) for every 0<a<20<a<\sqrt2.
  • Theorem 4.1 (p. 16): S2(1/2)→(Ta;Ia)\mathbb S^2(1/\sqrt2)\to(T_a;I_a) for every 0<a<20<a<\sqrt2.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.