Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Ghosal 2025 subsets lattice cubes avoiding affine spherical degeneracies
corollary_1_4: States that for large n the n by n grid contains at least 7n/12 points with no four collinear or concyclic.
corollary_1_6: For every d >= 3, the largest subset of [n]^d with no d+2 points on a (d-1)-sphere or hyperplane has size Omega(n^(min{d,4}/(d+1) - c/log log n)).
theorem_1_1: For k < d and r >= k+2, lower bounds for the largest subset of the grid [n]^d with no r points on a k-dimensional affine subspace, by the deletion method.
theorem_1_2: For k < d and r >= k+1, lower bounds for the largest subset of the grid [n]^d meeting every k-dimensional linear subspace in at most r-1 points, by the deletion method.
theorem_1_3: The number of cyclic quadrilaterals with vertices in the n by n grid is gamma n^5 plus an error O(n^(4+18/29+eps)), with gamma an explicit series enclosed in (0.35974, 0.36017).
theorem_1_5: For every d >= 3, upper and lower bounds on the number S(n,d) of (d+2)-tuples of points of [n]^d that lie on a (d-1)-sphere.
A. Ghosal, R. Goenka and P. Keevash, On subsets of lattice cubes avoiding affine and spherical degeneracies, arXiv:2509.06935v1 [math.CO], 8 September 2025, 18 pp.; MSC 05D40, 52C10, 52C35. Crossref records the journal version, Discrete & Computational Geometry 76(3) (2026), 1886--1911, DOI 10.1007/s00454-026-00853-7 (received 23 October 2025, accepted 18 May 2026, published online 16 July 2026), under a CC BY 4.0 license from its online date (record read 2026-10-07); it was not compared with the arXiv v1 read for this card, whose pages and labels the card uses.
The copy read for this card is the arXiv build of version 1 (margin stamp "arXiv:2509.06935v1 [math.CO] 8 Sep 2025"), 18 pages with a text layer, 525,450 bytes; physical and printed pages coincide. Provenance: the repository's survey download set of September 2026; the download URL was not recorded, but the stamp identifies the copy as https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06935v1. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2509.06935), every other right reserved.
Read status: claims checked. The statements of Theorems 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 1.5, Corollaries 1.4 and 1.6 and Lemma 4.5, with the definitions they use, were read clause by clause on the print; the half-page proof of Corollary 1.4 (p. 15) and the deduction of Corollary 1.6 (p. 9) were read as sketches, and the other proofs for structure only.
Contents
- Theorem 1.1 (p. 1; proof in Section 2, pp. 5--6): for and , the maximum number of points of with no on a -dimensional affine subspace is with for , for , and otherwise; the paper says this improves Sudakov--Tomon for and Lefmann for .
- Theorem 1.2 (p. 2; proof in Section 2): for and , the analogous bound for linear subspaces, with for and otherwise.
- Theorem 1.3 (p. 3; proof in Section 4.2, pp. 11--15): for any the number of cyclic quadrilaterals with vertices in is , where is the constant defined in (12) (p. 12); Lemma 4.5 (p. 15) locates in by a computer-assisted computation.
- Corollary 1.4 (p. 3; proof p. 15): for large there are at least points in with no four collinear or concyclic, that is , improving Thiele's for the Erdős--Purdy no-four-on-a-circle problem; the proof is computer-assisted through Lemma 4.5. The paper notes (p. 5) Dong and Xu's independent algebraic bound, of the same order with a better constant.
- Theorem 1.5 (p. 3; proof in Section 3, pp. 6--10): for every integer and a constant , for the number of -tuples of on a -sphere.
- Corollary 1.6 (p. 3; deduced p. 9): for , which the paper says improves Suk and White for .
Compiled scope
The statements above were read clause by clause; the proof of Corollary 1.4 and the deduction of Corollary 1.6 were read as sketches, and the counting arguments of Sections 2--4 and the computation behind Lemma 4.5 were not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Bears on. #98, through Corollary 1.4: its grid subsets have no four collinear and no four concyclic points but may have three collinear, so they do not meet the problem's hypothesis of no three on a line and no four on a circle; the problem page cites them as a nearby variant. No other result of the paper is linked to an Erdős problem here.
No file of this source is held: the arXiv license of the edition read does not permit its redistribution, the CC BY 4.0 journal version was not acquired, and the card cites the edition it names above.