Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Ahlswede 1996 sets integers pairwise common divisor factor

../


Ahlswede, Rudolf and Khachatrian, Levon H., Sets of integers with pairwise common divisor and a factor from a specified set of primes. Acta Arith. 75 (1996), 259--276.

For a finite prime set Q = {q_1 < ... < q_r}, let I(n,Q) consist of the sets A of integers up to n such that any two elements have a common divisor greater than 1 and every element shares a factor with the product of Q, and let f(n,Q) be the largest cardinality. Theorem 1, the main result, evaluates it: for n at least the product of the q_i, f(n,Q) = max over 1 <= j <= r of |M(2q_1, ..., 2q_j, q_1...q_j) cap N(n)|, where M(.) is the set of multiples. Specializing to n = q_1^{a_1} ... q_r^{a_r} recovers the Erdos-Graham problem on the maximal size g(n) of a set 1 < a_1 < ... < a_k = n with all pairs non-coprime, so Theorem 1 in particular proves the conjecture Erdos formulated (Conjecture 1) after the authors told him, during his 1992 visit to Bielefeld, that the earlier published guess for g(n) has easy counterexamples. A corollary computes the maximal upper asymptotic density of an infinite such set as max over j of (1/2)(1 - prod_{i<=j}(1 - 1/q_i) + 1/(q_1...q_j)), attained by a set possessing an asymptotic density. Theorem 2 gives the same formula among squarefree integers, f*(n,Q) = max over j of |M(2q_1, ..., 2q_j, q_1...q_j) cap N*(n)|, with no restriction on n; Section 5 only sketches its proof. Section 6 shows the lower bound restriction on n in Theorem 1 cannot be dropped. The setting is dual to that of their paper Sets of integers and quasi-integers with pairwise common divisor (Acta Arith. 74 (1996), 141--153), where a prime set is excluded rather than required. For Erdos problem 534 this settles the extremal value for sets with pairwise common divisors and a factor from a prescribed prime set whenever n is at least the product of the primes, which holds in the specialization above, so the problem's maximum is the value Conjecture 1 predicts.

Source: http://www.impan.pl/get/doi/10.4064/aa-75-3-259-276. The file's text layer carries no copyright or license line, and the publisher's record (https://www.impan.pl/get/doi/10.4064/aa-75-3-259-276, read 2026-10-02) offers the PDF under the link "Pobierz zgodnie z CC-BY" ("Free download under CC-BY license" on the English site), a Creative Commons Attribution license whose version the record does not name.

Bears on. #534

Results to transcribe.

  • Theorem 1: For every finite Q = {q_1 < ... < q_r} of primes and n >= prod q_i, f(n,Q) = max_{1<=j<=r} |M(2q_1, ..., 2q_j, q_1...q_j) cap N(n)|; in particular Erdos's Conjecture 1 for g(n) is true.
  • Corollary: The maximal upper asymptotic density of an infinite admissible set is max_{1<=j<=r} (1/2)(1 - prod_{i=1}^{j}(1 - 1/q_i) + 1/(q_1...q_j)), and the maximum is attained by a set with an asymptotic density.
  • Theorem 2: For every finite Q = {q_1 < ... < q_r} of primes and every n, f*(n,Q) = max_{1<=j<=r} |M(2q_1, ..., 2q_j, q_1...q_j) cap N*(n)|, where f*(n,Q) is the largest size of such a set of squarefree integers up to n; the proof is sketched in Section 5.
  • Section 6 remark: The restriction n >= prod_{i} q_i in Theorem 1 cannot be ignored.