Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Maier 1984 set divisors integer

../

theorem_1: For any function xi(n) tending to infinity, the least logarithmic ratio log(d'/d) of two distinct divisors of n is at most (log n)^(1-log 3) times exp(xi(n) sqrt(log log n)) for almost all n.

theorem_2: For every gamma below -log 2 / log(1 - 1/log 3) = 0.28754..., Hooley's function Delta(n) exceeds (log log n)^gamma for almost all n.


H. Maier and G. Tenenbaum, On the set of divisors of an integer, Invent. Math. 76 (1984), no. 1, 121--128 (Oblatum 20-IX-1983; dedicated to Pál Erdős on the occasion of his 70th birthday); DOI 10.1007/BF01388495.

The copy read for this card is the Göttingen digitization (GDZ) of the article: a terms-of-use wrapper page (PDF p. 1, the only page with a text layer) followed by the eight printed pages 121--128 as page images without a text layer (PDF p. nn is printed p. 119+n119+n). The identity was confirmed on the page image of p. 121 (head "Invent. math. 76, 121--128 (1984)", title and authors). Provenance: obtained in September 2026; the wrapper names the article's persistent address within volume 76 (Werk Id PPN356556735_0076), http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?PID=PPN356556735_0076|LOG_0015; 744,751 bytes. Read status: claims checked for Theorems 1 and 2 (statements read on the page images of pp. 121--122); Lemmas 1 and 2 (p. 123) were read as statements; the proofs (pp. 123--128) were read for structure only. That copy prints the digitizing library's terms on its wrapper page (PDF p. 1): access to the digitized documents is granted "strictly for noncommercial educational, research and private purposes", some of the library's collections "are protected by copyright", and "Publication and/or broadcast in any form (including electronic) requires prior written permission" from the library; a use permission for the Springer article that grants no redistribution right, every other right reserved.

Contents

The notation "p.p." (presque partout) means: for a sequence of asymptotic density 11.

  • Introduction (p. 121): Erdős's 45-year-old conjecture [1] that almost all integers possess a pair of divisors d<d′≤2dd<d'\le2d; Hooley's function Δ(n)=sup⁡ucard⁡{d:d∣n, u<d≤eu}\Delta(n)=\sup_u\operatorname{card}\{d: d\mid n,\ u<d\le eu\}; the best known results xlog⁡log⁡x≪∑n≤xΔ(n)≪x(log⁡x)αx\log\log x\ll\sum_{n\le x}\Delta(n)\ll x(\log x)^\alpha with α=0.21969\alpha=0.21969, and Δ(n)≪(log⁡n)β\Delta(n)\ll(\log n)^\beta p.p. for any β>log⁡2 (1−1/log⁡3)=0.06221…\beta>\log2\,(1-1/\log3)=0.06221\ldots.
  • Theorem 1 (p. 122; proof in section 3, pp. 123--126): let E(n)E(n) be the infimum of the numbers log⁡(d′/d)\log(d'/d) with d∣nd\mid n, d′∣nd'\mid n, d<d′d<d'. If ξ(n)\xi(n) is any function tending to infinity, then E(n)≤(log⁡n)1−log⁡3exp⁡{ξ(n)log⁡log⁡n}E(n)\le(\log n)^{1-\log3}\exp\{\xi(n)\sqrt{\log\log n}\} p.p. The paper calls this nearly best possible: by Erdős--Hall [2] the exponent 1−log⁡31-\log3 cannot be improved, and ξ(n)\xi(n) cannot tend to −∞-\infty as fast as −clog⁡log⁡log⁡log⁡n-c\sqrt{\log\log\log\log n}. A heuristic (p. 122) explains the exponent through the number U(n)=∏pν∥n(2ν+1)U(n)=\prod_{p^\nu\|n}(2\nu+1) of distinct ratios d′/dd'/d, which lies between 3ω(n)3^{\omega(n)} and 3Ω(n)3^{\Omega(n)}, and the normal order log⁡log⁡n\log\log n of ω(n)\omega(n) and Ω(n)\Omega(n). Historical remark: the first author's original indirect proof gave E(n)≤(log⁡n)1−log⁡3+ϵE(n)\le(\log n)^{1-\log3+\epsilon} p.p. for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0 through a comparison theorem; the paper presents the second author's number-theoretical proof.
  • Theorem 2 (p. 122; proof in section 4, pp. 126--128): for γ<−log⁡2/log⁡(1−1/log⁡3)=0.28754…\gamma<-\log2/\log(1-1/\log3)=0.28754\ldots, Δ(n)>(log⁡log⁡n)γ\Delta(n)>(\log\log n)^\gamma p.p.
  • Lemma 1 (p. 123), by the paper's account a weaker form of a theorem of Halberstam and Richert [6] that generalizes a result of Hall: if ff is nonnegative and multiplicative with f(pv)≤λ1λ2vf(p^v)\le\lambda_1\lambda_2^v for all primes pp and v≥1v\ge1, where λ1>0\lambda_1>0 and 0<λ2<20<\lambda_2<2, then for x≥1x\ge1 ∑n≤xf(n)≪x∏p≤x(1−p−1)∑v≥0f(pv)p−v\sum_{n\le x}f(n)\ll x\prod_{p\le x}(1-p^{-1})\sum_{v\ge0}f(p^v)p^{-v}, the implied constant depending on λ1\lambda_1 and λ2\lambda_2. Lemma 2 (p. 123): for 2≤u≤v≤x2\le u\le v\le x, the number of n≤xn\le x whose uu-smooth part is at least vv is ≪xexp⁡(−clog⁡v/log⁡u)\ll x\exp(-c\log v/\log u) for an absolute constant c>0c>0. Lemmas 3 to 5 and a Corollary (pp. 124--125) are steps of the proof of Theorem 1.
  • References (p. 128): fourteen items, including Erdős 1948 [1], Erdős--Hall 1979 "The propinquity of divisors" [2], Erdős--Tenenbaum 1981 and 1983 [4], [5], Hall--Tenenbaum [9], [10], Hooley 1979 [11] and Tenenbaum [12]--[14] (1979--1982, with [14] to appear).

Compiled scope

Pages 121--123 and 128 were read on the page images; pp. 123--128, the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2, were read for structure only. Result pages: Theorem 1 and Theorem 2, claims checked. Nothing was verified and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #144: Theorem 1 implies the problem's statement in a stronger form, since (log⁡n)1−log⁡3exp⁡{ξ(n)log⁡log⁡n}→0(\log n)^{1-\log3}\exp\{\xi(n)\sqrt{\log\log n}\}\to0 for slowly growing ξ\xi, so almost all nn have divisors d<d′<2dd<d'<2d, and indeed, for each fixed β<log⁡3−1\beta<\log3-1, with d′/d<1+(log⁡n)−βd'/d<1+(\log n)^{-\beta}; the set of such nn contains a sequence of asymptotic density 11 by the meaning of "p.p.", so it has density 11. Theorem 2 also implies the problem's statement, more weakly: for fixed 0<γ<0.28754…0<\gamma<0.28754\ldots it gives Δ(n)≥3\Delta(n)\geq3 p.p., and three divisors in an interval (u,eu](u,eu] include two with ratio below e1/2<2e^{1/2}<2.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.