Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Bucic 2019 universal unavoidable graphs

../

theorem_1_1: Bucić, Draganić and Sudakov's determination of the maximum number of edges of a graph contained in every graph with n vertices and e edges, in the dense range Chung and Erdős left open: C(n,2) − Θ(m²/log²m) for m = C(n,2) − e ≤ n log n and Θ(n³ log n/m) for n log n < m < n^{3/2−ε}.

theorem_1_2: Bucić, Draganić and Sudakov's universality form of their Theorem 1.1: the least number of edges g(n,m) of an n-vertex graph containing a copy of every graph with n vertices and m edges is Θ(m²/log²m) for m ≤ n log n and C(n,2) − Θ(n³ log n/m) for n log n < m < n^{3/2−ε}.


Matija Bucic, Nemanja Draganic, Benny Sudakov, Universal and unavoidable graphs. arXiv preprint (2019). arXiv:1912.04889.

Chung and Erdos asked in 1983 which graph with e edges minimizes the Turan number ex(n, H), equivalently how large an (n, e)-unavoidable graph can be, and left a gap for e greater than binom(n,2) - n^{1+o(1)}. Theorem 1.1 closes that gap: with m = binom(n,2) - e, the maximum number of edges f(n, e) in an (n, e)-unavoidable graph equals binom(n,2) - Theta(m^2 / log^2 m) when m <= n log n, and Theta(n^3 log n / m) when n log n < m < n^{3/2 - eps}. The lower bound in the second range is achieved by a random Erdos-Renyi graph, in contrast to the highly structured disjoint unions of complete bipartite graphs used by Chung and Erdos for cn^{4/3} < e < binom(n,2) - n^{1+c} and for m < cn, and for part of the range both examples are extremal up to a constant. Theorem 1.2 restates this as the minimum number of edges g(n, m) in a graph on n vertices universal for all graphs with n vertices and m edges, via the identity g(n, m) = binom(n,2) - f(n, e), extending work of Babai, Chung, Erdos, Graham and Spencer and of Alon and Asodi. For problem 766, this resolves the related Chung-Erdos minimum-Turan question but never fixes both the vertex and the edge count as the problem's function f(n; k, l) requires.

Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04889.

Edition. The copy read for this card is arXiv:1912.04889v2, stamped "[math.CO] 21 Dec 2020" on p. 1 (14 pages with a text layer). The journal version, Combin. Probab. Comput. 30 (2021), no. 6, 942--955, doi:10.1017/S0963548321000110 (the arXiv record's journal reference and the Crossref record), is not held and was not compared; locators are preprint pages. The Crossref record names a CC BY 4.0 license for the journal version, as does the publisher's page reached through the DOI. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1912.04889), every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for the definitions and Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 (pp. 1--2), read clause by clause on the rendered page images; the digest's statement of Theorem 1.1 agrees with the print; the proofs (Sections 2--3, pp. 3--11) were read for their structure only, not verified. Paged at theorem_1_1 and theorem_1_2.

Bears on. #766: context only. Theorem 1.1 (p. 2, page image) settles the Chung--Erdős question on the largest (n,e)(n,e)-unavoidable graph, where the forbidden graph's edge count ee is tied to the host and its vertex count is free; the problem's f(n;k,l)f(n;k,l) fixes both kk and ll and lets nn grow, and nothing here transfers to it. Theorem 1.2 (p. 2), the same result in universality form, bears on it only through that equivalence, also context only.

Results paged.

  • Theorem 1.1 (p. 2): For any eps > 0, with m = binom(n,2) - e: f(n, e) = binom(n,2) - Theta(m^2/log^2 m) for m <= n log n, and f(n, e) = Theta(n^3 log n / m) for n log n < m < n^{3/2-eps}.
  • Theorem 1.2 (p. 2): For any eps > 0, the minimum number of edges g(n, m) in an H(n, m)-universal graph on n vertices is Theta(m^2/log^2 m) for m <= n log n and binom(n,2) - Theta(n^3 log n / m) for n log n < m < n^{3/2-eps}. It is equivalent to Theorem 1.1 through identity (1), g(n, m) = binom(n,2) - f(n, e) with m = binom(n,2) - e, and is the form the paper proves (Section 3.3, p. 11).

No file of this source is held: the arXiv license of the edition read does not permit its redistribution, the CC BY 4.0 journal version was not acquired, and the card cites the edition it names above.