Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Example 1, p. 22, of G.-T. Chen, P. Erdős and E. T. Ordman, Clique partitions of split graphs, in: Y. Alavi, D. R. Lick and J. Liu (eds.), Combinatorics, Graph Theory, Algorithms and Applications (Beijing, 1993), World Scientific, Singapore, 1994, pp. 21--30; the edition read is identified on the source card.
Statement
Setting (pp. 21--22). is the least number of cliques of containing each edge of exactly once. is the split graph on vertices with vertices in the clique and in the independent set, all connecting edges present; it is also a threshold graph (p. 22).
Example 1 (p. 22, quoted). "The clique partition number of is , provided 6 divides ."
The paper introduces the example (p. 22) to show that of a chordal graph on vertices can exceed by a term linear in , and calls the construction well known; the abstract says that a split graph on vertices "may require as many as cliques" (p. 21). When the paper says the value grows by a term linear in and thereafter writes its bounds with (p. 23).
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the construction and the attribution of minimality were read on the page images (pp. 21--23). The minimality is not proved in the paper and was not checked here. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Upper bound, p. 22: the clique splits into perfect matchings of edges each (this uses ); joining each matching to its own independent vertex turns each of the clique edges into the base of a triangle, and the connecting edges left over are taken singly, for cliques. Lower bound: the paper cites its references [7] (Erdős, Faudree and Ordman, Discrete Math. 72 (1988)) and [14] (Pullman and Donald, Utilitas Math. 19 (1981)) and gives an informal counting reason: connecting edges can be merged into larger cliques only by spending clique edges, and one triangle per clique edge is the best rate.
Dependencies
The minimality rests on P. Erdős, R. Faudree and E. Ordman, Clique coverings and clique partitions, Discrete Math. 72 (1988), 93--101, or N. J. Pullman and A. Donald, Clique coverings of graphs -- II: Complements of cliques, Utilitas Math. 19 (1981), 207--213, as the paper cites them.
Bears on
Problem 81 asks whether every chordal graph on vertices has a clique partition into cliques. is split, hence chordal (p. 22), and needs cliques, so the constant in the question cannot be lowered; the example says nothing about the upper bound.