Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Conlon 2021 extremal number subdivisions

../

theorem_1_3: Gives an exponent strictly below three halves for every fixed C4-free bipartite forbidden graph with degree at most two on one side.

theorem_4_2: Gives the exponent three halves minus 1/(12t) for the extremal number of the one-subdivision of each fixed complete bipartite graph K_{s,t} with 2 <= s <= t.

theorem_5_1: Gives the explicit exponent three halves minus six to the minus t for the extremal number of the one-subdivision of each fixed clique K_t.


David Conlon and Joonkyung Lee, On the extremal number of subdivisions, International Mathematics Research Notices 2021(12), 9122--9145. DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnz088.

The copy read for this card is arXiv:1807.05008v2, dated 8 February 2019, with 17 pages. Printed and PDF page numbers agree. The journal typesetting was not compared with this manuscript. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1807.05008), every other right reserved.

Theorem 1.3, on p. 2, says that every fixed C4C_4-free bipartite graph HH with degree at most two on one side has ex⁡(n,H)≤CHn3/2−δH\operatorname{ex}(n,H)\le C_Hn^{3/2-\delta_H} for some positive CH,δHC_H,\delta_H. The one-subdivision of every fixed simple graph satisfies these conditions. For cliques, Theorem 5.1, on p. 9, gives the explicit estimate

ex⁡(n,Ht)≤Ctn3/2−6−t,t≥3,\operatorname{ex}(n,H_t)\le C_t n^{3/2-6^{-t}},\qquad t\ge3,

where HtH_t is the one-subdivision of KtK_t. This is the graph GkG_k of Problem 1021 when t=kt=k: every pair of original clique vertices receives its own distinct new vertex. The source's subdivision convention replaces every edge by a path of length two, not by a path of unspecified length. Both the multiplicative constant and the exponent gap depend on the fixed forbidden graph. The source derives Theorem 1.3 from Theorem 5.1, since every tt-vertex graph of the class is a subgraph of the one-subdivision of KtK_t (p. 9). As a warm-up, Theorem 4.2, on p. 8, gives ex⁡(n,Hs,t)≤Cn3/2−1/12t\operatorname{ex}(n,H_{s,t})\le Cn^{3/2-1/12t} for the one-subdivision Hs,tH_{s,t} of Ks,tK_{s,t}, 2≤s≤t2\le s\le t. The concluding remarks on p. 14 record the lower bound ctn3/2−(t−3/2)/(t2−t−1)≤ex⁡(n,Ht)c_tn^{3/2-(t-3/2)/(t^2-t-1)}\le\operatorname{ex}(n,H_t) from the probabilistic deletion method.

For context, Theorem 1.1 on p. 1 is the Füredi theorem, reproved by Alon--Krivelevich--Sudakov, giving O(n2−1/r)O(n^{2-1/r}) when degrees on one side are at most rr. Conjecture 1.2 on p. 2 proposes a power improvement when HH contains no Kr,rK_{r,r}; Theorem 1.3 proves its r=2r=2 case. The source identifies the clique-subdivision question as an Erdős question from 1988 on p. 2. The earlier historical primary passage was not inspected here.

The proof uses a variant of dependent random choice. It separates a case with many four-cycles in a large subgraph from a case with well-distributed copies of K1,2K_{1,2}. The final assembly of Theorem 5.1 is on p. 14 and depends on the almost-regular reduction in Lemma 2.3 and the suitable-tuple count in Lemma 5.4. These proof steps remain pointers, not a local reconstruction. Janzer's Theorem 3 improves the explicit clique-subdivision gap to 1/(4t−6)1/(4t-6).

Reading and proof scope. Complete rendered pp. 1--2, 8--9 and 14 were inspected for source identity, definitions, exact statements and final proof assembly. The intervening proofs and external inputs were not independently checked. The result pages are statement extractions with proof pointers; they confer no complete source-proof acceptance or formal-verification credit. The arXiv version and author/publication records were checked; the bounded search is recorded on the problem page.

Source: arXiv:1807.05008v2.

Bears on. #1021: Theorem 5.1 bounds ex⁡(n,Gk)\operatorname{ex}(n,G_k) by Ckn3/2−6−kC_kn^{3/2-6^{-k}} for every k≥3k\ge3, since GkG_k is the one-subdivision of KkK_k; Theorem 1.3 gives some positive exponent gap for each GkG_k without an explicit value. Theorem 4.2 concerns subdivided complete bipartite graphs and does not bear on the problem.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.